Cargando…
Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods
Pressure is an essential parameter for the normal function of almost all organs in the human body. Measurement of pressure is therefore highly important in clinical practice and medical research. In clinical practice, pressures are often measured indirectly through a fluid line where the pressure is...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29970801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18072128 |
_version_ | 1783343358479958016 |
---|---|
author | Clausen, Ingelin W. Tvedt, Lars Geir Glott, Thomas |
author_facet | Clausen, Ingelin W. Tvedt, Lars Geir Glott, Thomas |
author_sort | Clausen, Ingelin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pressure is an essential parameter for the normal function of almost all organs in the human body. Measurement of pressure is therefore highly important in clinical practice and medical research. In clinical practice, pressures are often measured indirectly through a fluid line where the pressure is transmitted from the organ of interest to a remote, externally localized transducer. This method has several limitations and is prone to artefacts from movements. Results from an in vitro bench study comparing the characteristics of two different sensor systems for bladder assessment are presented; a new cystometry system using a MEMS-based in-target organ sensor was compared with a conventional system using water-filled lines connected to external transducers. Robustness to measurement errors due to patient movement was investigated through response to forced vibrations. While the new cystometry system detected real changes in applied pressure for excitation frequencies ranging from 5 Hz to 25 Hz, such small and high-frequency stimuli were not transmitted through the water-filled line connected to the external transducer. The new sensor system worked well after a resilient test at frequencies up to 70 Hz. The in-target organ sensor system will offer new possibilities for long-term monitoring of in vivo pressure in general. This opens up the possibility for future personalized medical treatment and renders possible new health services and, thereby, an increased patient empowerment and quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6068839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60688392018-08-07 Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods Clausen, Ingelin W. Tvedt, Lars Geir Glott, Thomas Sensors (Basel) Article Pressure is an essential parameter for the normal function of almost all organs in the human body. Measurement of pressure is therefore highly important in clinical practice and medical research. In clinical practice, pressures are often measured indirectly through a fluid line where the pressure is transmitted from the organ of interest to a remote, externally localized transducer. This method has several limitations and is prone to artefacts from movements. Results from an in vitro bench study comparing the characteristics of two different sensor systems for bladder assessment are presented; a new cystometry system using a MEMS-based in-target organ sensor was compared with a conventional system using water-filled lines connected to external transducers. Robustness to measurement errors due to patient movement was investigated through response to forced vibrations. While the new cystometry system detected real changes in applied pressure for excitation frequencies ranging from 5 Hz to 25 Hz, such small and high-frequency stimuli were not transmitted through the water-filled line connected to the external transducer. The new sensor system worked well after a resilient test at frequencies up to 70 Hz. The in-target organ sensor system will offer new possibilities for long-term monitoring of in vivo pressure in general. This opens up the possibility for future personalized medical treatment and renders possible new health services and, thereby, an increased patient empowerment and quality of life. MDPI 2018-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6068839/ /pubmed/29970801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18072128 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Clausen, Ingelin W. Tvedt, Lars Geir Glott, Thomas Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods |
title | Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods |
title_full | Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods |
title_fullStr | Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods |
title_short | Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods |
title_sort | measurement of urinary bladder pressure: a comparison of methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29970801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18072128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clauseningelin measurementofurinarybladderpressureacomparisonofmethods AT wtvedtlarsgeir measurementofurinarybladderpressureacomparisonofmethods AT glottthomas measurementofurinarybladderpressureacomparisonofmethods |