Cargando…

Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods

Pressure is an essential parameter for the normal function of almost all organs in the human body. Measurement of pressure is therefore highly important in clinical practice and medical research. In clinical practice, pressures are often measured indirectly through a fluid line where the pressure is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clausen, Ingelin, W. Tvedt, Lars Geir, Glott, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29970801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18072128
_version_ 1783343358479958016
author Clausen, Ingelin
W. Tvedt, Lars Geir
Glott, Thomas
author_facet Clausen, Ingelin
W. Tvedt, Lars Geir
Glott, Thomas
author_sort Clausen, Ingelin
collection PubMed
description Pressure is an essential parameter for the normal function of almost all organs in the human body. Measurement of pressure is therefore highly important in clinical practice and medical research. In clinical practice, pressures are often measured indirectly through a fluid line where the pressure is transmitted from the organ of interest to a remote, externally localized transducer. This method has several limitations and is prone to artefacts from movements. Results from an in vitro bench study comparing the characteristics of two different sensor systems for bladder assessment are presented; a new cystometry system using a MEMS-based in-target organ sensor was compared with a conventional system using water-filled lines connected to external transducers. Robustness to measurement errors due to patient movement was investigated through response to forced vibrations. While the new cystometry system detected real changes in applied pressure for excitation frequencies ranging from 5 Hz to 25 Hz, such small and high-frequency stimuli were not transmitted through the water-filled line connected to the external transducer. The new sensor system worked well after a resilient test at frequencies up to 70 Hz. The in-target organ sensor system will offer new possibilities for long-term monitoring of in vivo pressure in general. This opens up the possibility for future personalized medical treatment and renders possible new health services and, thereby, an increased patient empowerment and quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6068839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60688392018-08-07 Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods Clausen, Ingelin W. Tvedt, Lars Geir Glott, Thomas Sensors (Basel) Article Pressure is an essential parameter for the normal function of almost all organs in the human body. Measurement of pressure is therefore highly important in clinical practice and medical research. In clinical practice, pressures are often measured indirectly through a fluid line where the pressure is transmitted from the organ of interest to a remote, externally localized transducer. This method has several limitations and is prone to artefacts from movements. Results from an in vitro bench study comparing the characteristics of two different sensor systems for bladder assessment are presented; a new cystometry system using a MEMS-based in-target organ sensor was compared with a conventional system using water-filled lines connected to external transducers. Robustness to measurement errors due to patient movement was investigated through response to forced vibrations. While the new cystometry system detected real changes in applied pressure for excitation frequencies ranging from 5 Hz to 25 Hz, such small and high-frequency stimuli were not transmitted through the water-filled line connected to the external transducer. The new sensor system worked well after a resilient test at frequencies up to 70 Hz. The in-target organ sensor system will offer new possibilities for long-term monitoring of in vivo pressure in general. This opens up the possibility for future personalized medical treatment and renders possible new health services and, thereby, an increased patient empowerment and quality of life. MDPI 2018-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6068839/ /pubmed/29970801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18072128 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Clausen, Ingelin
W. Tvedt, Lars Geir
Glott, Thomas
Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods
title Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods
title_full Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods
title_fullStr Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods
title_short Measurement of Urinary Bladder Pressure: A Comparison of Methods
title_sort measurement of urinary bladder pressure: a comparison of methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6068839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29970801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18072128
work_keys_str_mv AT clauseningelin measurementofurinarybladderpressureacomparisonofmethods
AT wtvedtlarsgeir measurementofurinarybladderpressureacomparisonofmethods
AT glottthomas measurementofurinarybladderpressureacomparisonofmethods