Cargando…

The Accuracy of the Detection of Body Postures and Movements Using a Physical Activity Monitor in People after a Stroke

Background: In stroke rehabilitation not only are the levels of physical activity important, but body postures and movements performed during one’s daily-life are also important. This information is provided by a new one-sensor accelerometer that is commercially available, low-cost, and user-friendl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fanchamps, Malou H. J., Horemans, Herwin L. D., Ribbers, Gerard M., Stam, Henk J., Bussmann, Johannes B. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976900
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18072167
_version_ 1783343449864404992
author Fanchamps, Malou H. J.
Horemans, Herwin L. D.
Ribbers, Gerard M.
Stam, Henk J.
Bussmann, Johannes B. J.
author_facet Fanchamps, Malou H. J.
Horemans, Herwin L. D.
Ribbers, Gerard M.
Stam, Henk J.
Bussmann, Johannes B. J.
author_sort Fanchamps, Malou H. J.
collection PubMed
description Background: In stroke rehabilitation not only are the levels of physical activity important, but body postures and movements performed during one’s daily-life are also important. This information is provided by a new one-sensor accelerometer that is commercially available, low-cost, and user-friendly. The present study examines the accuracy of this activity monitor (Activ8) in detecting several classes of body postures and movements in people after a stroke. Methods: Twenty-five people after a stroke participated in an activity protocol with either basic activities or daily-life activities performed in a laboratory and/or at home. Participants wore an Activ8 on their less-affected thigh. The primary outcome was the difference in registered time for the merged class “upright position” (standing/walking/running) between the Activ8 and the video recording (the reference method). Secondary analyses focused on classes other than “upright position”. Results: The Activ8 underestimated the merged class “upright position” by 3.8% (775 s). The secondary analyses showed an overestimation of “lying/sitting” (4.5% (569 s)) and of “cycling” (6.5% (206 s)). The differences were lowest for basic activities in the laboratory and highest for daily-life activities at home. Conclusions: The Activ8 is sufficiently accurate in detecting different classes of body postures and movements of people after a stroke during basic activities and daily-life activities in a laboratory and/or at home.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6069255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60692552018-08-07 The Accuracy of the Detection of Body Postures and Movements Using a Physical Activity Monitor in People after a Stroke Fanchamps, Malou H. J. Horemans, Herwin L. D. Ribbers, Gerard M. Stam, Henk J. Bussmann, Johannes B. J. Sensors (Basel) Article Background: In stroke rehabilitation not only are the levels of physical activity important, but body postures and movements performed during one’s daily-life are also important. This information is provided by a new one-sensor accelerometer that is commercially available, low-cost, and user-friendly. The present study examines the accuracy of this activity monitor (Activ8) in detecting several classes of body postures and movements in people after a stroke. Methods: Twenty-five people after a stroke participated in an activity protocol with either basic activities or daily-life activities performed in a laboratory and/or at home. Participants wore an Activ8 on their less-affected thigh. The primary outcome was the difference in registered time for the merged class “upright position” (standing/walking/running) between the Activ8 and the video recording (the reference method). Secondary analyses focused on classes other than “upright position”. Results: The Activ8 underestimated the merged class “upright position” by 3.8% (775 s). The secondary analyses showed an overestimation of “lying/sitting” (4.5% (569 s)) and of “cycling” (6.5% (206 s)). The differences were lowest for basic activities in the laboratory and highest for daily-life activities at home. Conclusions: The Activ8 is sufficiently accurate in detecting different classes of body postures and movements of people after a stroke during basic activities and daily-life activities in a laboratory and/or at home. MDPI 2018-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6069255/ /pubmed/29976900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18072167 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fanchamps, Malou H. J.
Horemans, Herwin L. D.
Ribbers, Gerard M.
Stam, Henk J.
Bussmann, Johannes B. J.
The Accuracy of the Detection of Body Postures and Movements Using a Physical Activity Monitor in People after a Stroke
title The Accuracy of the Detection of Body Postures and Movements Using a Physical Activity Monitor in People after a Stroke
title_full The Accuracy of the Detection of Body Postures and Movements Using a Physical Activity Monitor in People after a Stroke
title_fullStr The Accuracy of the Detection of Body Postures and Movements Using a Physical Activity Monitor in People after a Stroke
title_full_unstemmed The Accuracy of the Detection of Body Postures and Movements Using a Physical Activity Monitor in People after a Stroke
title_short The Accuracy of the Detection of Body Postures and Movements Using a Physical Activity Monitor in People after a Stroke
title_sort accuracy of the detection of body postures and movements using a physical activity monitor in people after a stroke
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976900
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18072167
work_keys_str_mv AT fanchampsmalouhj theaccuracyofthedetectionofbodyposturesandmovementsusingaphysicalactivitymonitorinpeopleafterastroke
AT horemansherwinld theaccuracyofthedetectionofbodyposturesandmovementsusingaphysicalactivitymonitorinpeopleafterastroke
AT ribbersgerardm theaccuracyofthedetectionofbodyposturesandmovementsusingaphysicalactivitymonitorinpeopleafterastroke
AT stamhenkj theaccuracyofthedetectionofbodyposturesandmovementsusingaphysicalactivitymonitorinpeopleafterastroke
AT bussmannjohannesbj theaccuracyofthedetectionofbodyposturesandmovementsusingaphysicalactivitymonitorinpeopleafterastroke
AT fanchampsmalouhj accuracyofthedetectionofbodyposturesandmovementsusingaphysicalactivitymonitorinpeopleafterastroke
AT horemansherwinld accuracyofthedetectionofbodyposturesandmovementsusingaphysicalactivitymonitorinpeopleafterastroke
AT ribbersgerardm accuracyofthedetectionofbodyposturesandmovementsusingaphysicalactivitymonitorinpeopleafterastroke
AT stamhenkj accuracyofthedetectionofbodyposturesandmovementsusingaphysicalactivitymonitorinpeopleafterastroke
AT bussmannjohannesbj accuracyofthedetectionofbodyposturesandmovementsusingaphysicalactivitymonitorinpeopleafterastroke