Cargando…

Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments

China’s environmental problems have long been criticized. The Communist Party of China (CPC) and the government have increasingly paid attention to developing environmental protection and included the construction of an ecological civilization in the “Five-in-One” development strategy. The improveme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Zifeng, Zhang, Manli, Mao, Qingduo, Yu, Bingxin, Ma, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002318
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071473
_version_ 1783343504678715392
author Liang, Zifeng
Zhang, Manli
Mao, Qingduo
Yu, Bingxin
Ma, Ben
author_facet Liang, Zifeng
Zhang, Manli
Mao, Qingduo
Yu, Bingxin
Ma, Ben
author_sort Liang, Zifeng
collection PubMed
description China’s environmental problems have long been criticized. The Communist Party of China (CPC) and the government have increasingly paid attention to developing environmental protection and included the construction of an ecological civilization in the “Five-in-One” development strategy. The improvement of regional eco-efficiency is an important way to realize the coordinated development of the entire society, and environmental policy instruments are a powerful means to enhance regional eco-efficiency. This paper categorizes environmental policy instruments into mandatory, hybrid, and voluntary types. Based on panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2005 to 2015, the paper discusses the impact of environmental policy instruments on regional eco-efficiency and the means of the impact. The research shows that (1) mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments play a significant role in promoting regional eco-efficiency, while the role of voluntary instruments is not significant in promoting regional eco-efficiency; (2) hybrid and mandatory environmental policy instruments have negative interactions; and (3) the level of economic development will positively affect the role of hybrid environmental policy instruments in promoting regional eco-efficiency but negatively affect the role of mandatory instruments in promoting regional efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6069474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60694742018-08-07 Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments Liang, Zifeng Zhang, Manli Mao, Qingduo Yu, Bingxin Ma, Ben Int J Environ Res Public Health Article China’s environmental problems have long been criticized. The Communist Party of China (CPC) and the government have increasingly paid attention to developing environmental protection and included the construction of an ecological civilization in the “Five-in-One” development strategy. The improvement of regional eco-efficiency is an important way to realize the coordinated development of the entire society, and environmental policy instruments are a powerful means to enhance regional eco-efficiency. This paper categorizes environmental policy instruments into mandatory, hybrid, and voluntary types. Based on panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2005 to 2015, the paper discusses the impact of environmental policy instruments on regional eco-efficiency and the means of the impact. The research shows that (1) mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments play a significant role in promoting regional eco-efficiency, while the role of voluntary instruments is not significant in promoting regional eco-efficiency; (2) hybrid and mandatory environmental policy instruments have negative interactions; and (3) the level of economic development will positively affect the role of hybrid environmental policy instruments in promoting regional eco-efficiency but negatively affect the role of mandatory instruments in promoting regional efficiency. MDPI 2018-07-12 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6069474/ /pubmed/30002318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071473 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liang, Zifeng
Zhang, Manli
Mao, Qingduo
Yu, Bingxin
Ma, Ben
Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments
title Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments
title_full Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments
title_fullStr Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments
title_full_unstemmed Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments
title_short Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments
title_sort improvement of eco-efficiency in china: a comparison of mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002318
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071473
work_keys_str_mv AT liangzifeng improvementofecoefficiencyinchinaacomparisonofmandatoryandhybridenvironmentalpolicyinstruments
AT zhangmanli improvementofecoefficiencyinchinaacomparisonofmandatoryandhybridenvironmentalpolicyinstruments
AT maoqingduo improvementofecoefficiencyinchinaacomparisonofmandatoryandhybridenvironmentalpolicyinstruments
AT yubingxin improvementofecoefficiencyinchinaacomparisonofmandatoryandhybridenvironmentalpolicyinstruments
AT maben improvementofecoefficiencyinchinaacomparisonofmandatoryandhybridenvironmentalpolicyinstruments