Cargando…
Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments
China’s environmental problems have long been criticized. The Communist Party of China (CPC) and the government have increasingly paid attention to developing environmental protection and included the construction of an ecological civilization in the “Five-in-One” development strategy. The improveme...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071473 |
_version_ | 1783343504678715392 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Zifeng Zhang, Manli Mao, Qingduo Yu, Bingxin Ma, Ben |
author_facet | Liang, Zifeng Zhang, Manli Mao, Qingduo Yu, Bingxin Ma, Ben |
author_sort | Liang, Zifeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | China’s environmental problems have long been criticized. The Communist Party of China (CPC) and the government have increasingly paid attention to developing environmental protection and included the construction of an ecological civilization in the “Five-in-One” development strategy. The improvement of regional eco-efficiency is an important way to realize the coordinated development of the entire society, and environmental policy instruments are a powerful means to enhance regional eco-efficiency. This paper categorizes environmental policy instruments into mandatory, hybrid, and voluntary types. Based on panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2005 to 2015, the paper discusses the impact of environmental policy instruments on regional eco-efficiency and the means of the impact. The research shows that (1) mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments play a significant role in promoting regional eco-efficiency, while the role of voluntary instruments is not significant in promoting regional eco-efficiency; (2) hybrid and mandatory environmental policy instruments have negative interactions; and (3) the level of economic development will positively affect the role of hybrid environmental policy instruments in promoting regional eco-efficiency but negatively affect the role of mandatory instruments in promoting regional efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6069474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60694742018-08-07 Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments Liang, Zifeng Zhang, Manli Mao, Qingduo Yu, Bingxin Ma, Ben Int J Environ Res Public Health Article China’s environmental problems have long been criticized. The Communist Party of China (CPC) and the government have increasingly paid attention to developing environmental protection and included the construction of an ecological civilization in the “Five-in-One” development strategy. The improvement of regional eco-efficiency is an important way to realize the coordinated development of the entire society, and environmental policy instruments are a powerful means to enhance regional eco-efficiency. This paper categorizes environmental policy instruments into mandatory, hybrid, and voluntary types. Based on panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2005 to 2015, the paper discusses the impact of environmental policy instruments on regional eco-efficiency and the means of the impact. The research shows that (1) mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments play a significant role in promoting regional eco-efficiency, while the role of voluntary instruments is not significant in promoting regional eco-efficiency; (2) hybrid and mandatory environmental policy instruments have negative interactions; and (3) the level of economic development will positively affect the role of hybrid environmental policy instruments in promoting regional eco-efficiency but negatively affect the role of mandatory instruments in promoting regional efficiency. MDPI 2018-07-12 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6069474/ /pubmed/30002318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071473 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Liang, Zifeng Zhang, Manli Mao, Qingduo Yu, Bingxin Ma, Ben Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments |
title | Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments |
title_full | Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments |
title_fullStr | Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments |
title_full_unstemmed | Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments |
title_short | Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments |
title_sort | improvement of eco-efficiency in china: a comparison of mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liangzifeng improvementofecoefficiencyinchinaacomparisonofmandatoryandhybridenvironmentalpolicyinstruments AT zhangmanli improvementofecoefficiencyinchinaacomparisonofmandatoryandhybridenvironmentalpolicyinstruments AT maoqingduo improvementofecoefficiencyinchinaacomparisonofmandatoryandhybridenvironmentalpolicyinstruments AT yubingxin improvementofecoefficiencyinchinaacomparisonofmandatoryandhybridenvironmentalpolicyinstruments AT maben improvementofecoefficiencyinchinaacomparisonofmandatoryandhybridenvironmentalpolicyinstruments |