Cargando…
Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies
Policy and management related to the release of organisms generated by emerging biotechnologies for pest management should be informed through public engagement. Regulatory decisions can be conceptually distinguished into the development of frameworks, the assessment of the release of a specific mod...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12919-018-0109-x |
_version_ | 1783343513338904576 |
---|---|
author | Burgess, Michael M. Mumford, John D. Lavery, James V. |
author_facet | Burgess, Michael M. Mumford, John D. Lavery, James V. |
author_sort | Burgess, Michael M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Policy and management related to the release of organisms generated by emerging biotechnologies for pest management should be informed through public engagement. Regulatory decisions can be conceptually distinguished into the development of frameworks, the assessment of the release of a specific modified organism, and implementation decisions such as location and timing. Although these decisions are often intertwined in practice, the negotiation takes place at different stages of technology development and suggests different roles for public engagement. Some approaches to public engagement are more appropriate for different purposes and situations, and it is not always obvious how to go about matching the approach to the purpose. In addition to the diverse technologies involved in generating modified organisms, there are diverse publics with particular interests and different kinds of knowledge. Institutional interests range from commercial development to public regulation and future uptake. Contextual features, such as agency mandates, may limit or structure the extent and approach to public engagement. Different convening groups (government agencies, public interest groups, academics, businesses) and the kind of decision that is being considered determine what kind of input is needed and how the engaging groups will be constituted. This paper considers how the context of the release of genetically modified insects for pest control requires expanding approaches to the design of the public engagement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6069509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60695092018-08-03 Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies Burgess, Michael M. Mumford, John D. Lavery, James V. BMC Proc Review Policy and management related to the release of organisms generated by emerging biotechnologies for pest management should be informed through public engagement. Regulatory decisions can be conceptually distinguished into the development of frameworks, the assessment of the release of a specific modified organism, and implementation decisions such as location and timing. Although these decisions are often intertwined in practice, the negotiation takes place at different stages of technology development and suggests different roles for public engagement. Some approaches to public engagement are more appropriate for different purposes and situations, and it is not always obvious how to go about matching the approach to the purpose. In addition to the diverse technologies involved in generating modified organisms, there are diverse publics with particular interests and different kinds of knowledge. Institutional interests range from commercial development to public regulation and future uptake. Contextual features, such as agency mandates, may limit or structure the extent and approach to public engagement. Different convening groups (government agencies, public interest groups, academics, businesses) and the kind of decision that is being considered determine what kind of input is needed and how the engaging groups will be constituted. This paper considers how the context of the release of genetically modified insects for pest control requires expanding approaches to the design of the public engagement. BioMed Central 2018-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6069509/ /pubmed/30079103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12919-018-0109-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Burgess, Michael M. Mumford, John D. Lavery, James V. Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies |
title | Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies |
title_full | Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies |
title_fullStr | Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies |
title_short | Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies |
title_sort | public engagement pathways for emerging gm insect technologies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12919-018-0109-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burgessmichaelm publicengagementpathwaysforemerginggminsecttechnologies AT mumfordjohnd publicengagementpathwaysforemerginggminsecttechnologies AT laveryjamesv publicengagementpathwaysforemerginggminsecttechnologies |