Cargando…

Assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments

BACKGROUD: The severity of an allergic reaction can range from mild local symptoms to anaphylactic shock. To score this, a number of instruments have been developed, although heterogeneous in design and purpose. Severity scoring algorithms are therefore difficult to compare, but are frequently used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eller, Esben, Muraro, Antonella, Dahl, Ronald, Mortz, Charlotte Gotthard, Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-018-0215-x
_version_ 1783343521318567936
author Eller, Esben
Muraro, Antonella
Dahl, Ronald
Mortz, Charlotte Gotthard
Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten
author_facet Eller, Esben
Muraro, Antonella
Dahl, Ronald
Mortz, Charlotte Gotthard
Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten
author_sort Eller, Esben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUD: The severity of an allergic reaction can range from mild local symptoms to anaphylactic shock. To score this, a number of instruments have been developed, although heterogeneous in design and purpose. Severity scoring algorithms are therefore difficult to compare, but are frequently used beyond their initial purpose. Our objective was to compare the most used severity scoring instruments by a data-driven approach on both milder reactions and anaphylaxis. METHODS: All positive challenges to foods or drugs (n = 2828) including anaphylaxis (n = 616) at Odense University Hospital, Denmark from 1998 to 2016 were included and severity was scored according to Sampson5. Based on recommendations from an expert group, the symptoms and values from Sampson5 were for all reactions and anaphylaxis only translated and compared by kappa statistics with 22 instruments, ranging from 3 to 6 steps. RESULTS: For milder reactions, there was a significant correlation between the number of steps in an instrument and the number of challenges that could be translated, whereas all instruments were good to identify food anaphylaxis. Some instruments scored reactions more severely than Sampson5, other scored them milder and some scored food and drug challenges differently. Instruments for hymenoptera reactions were difficult to apply on food and drug reactions, and thus distributed severity differently. Algorithms hampered the translation between instruments, and 7 instruments were poor concerning drug anaphylaxis, including the only instrument developed specifically for drug reactions. CONCLUSION: The distributions of severity differed between the 23 instruments in both food and drug allergy, and thus rendering translation especially between scoring systems with 3 and 5 grades difficult. Fine-graded and simple instruments are preferred for comparison especially among milder reactions, and instruments applied to non-intended situations may not reflect a true severity picture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6069559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60695592018-08-03 Assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments Eller, Esben Muraro, Antonella Dahl, Ronald Mortz, Charlotte Gotthard Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten Clin Transl Allergy Research BACKGROUD: The severity of an allergic reaction can range from mild local symptoms to anaphylactic shock. To score this, a number of instruments have been developed, although heterogeneous in design and purpose. Severity scoring algorithms are therefore difficult to compare, but are frequently used beyond their initial purpose. Our objective was to compare the most used severity scoring instruments by a data-driven approach on both milder reactions and anaphylaxis. METHODS: All positive challenges to foods or drugs (n = 2828) including anaphylaxis (n = 616) at Odense University Hospital, Denmark from 1998 to 2016 were included and severity was scored according to Sampson5. Based on recommendations from an expert group, the symptoms and values from Sampson5 were for all reactions and anaphylaxis only translated and compared by kappa statistics with 22 instruments, ranging from 3 to 6 steps. RESULTS: For milder reactions, there was a significant correlation between the number of steps in an instrument and the number of challenges that could be translated, whereas all instruments were good to identify food anaphylaxis. Some instruments scored reactions more severely than Sampson5, other scored them milder and some scored food and drug challenges differently. Instruments for hymenoptera reactions were difficult to apply on food and drug reactions, and thus distributed severity differently. Algorithms hampered the translation between instruments, and 7 instruments were poor concerning drug anaphylaxis, including the only instrument developed specifically for drug reactions. CONCLUSION: The distributions of severity differed between the 23 instruments in both food and drug allergy, and thus rendering translation especially between scoring systems with 3 and 5 grades difficult. Fine-graded and simple instruments are preferred for comparison especially among milder reactions, and instruments applied to non-intended situations may not reflect a true severity picture. BioMed Central 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6069559/ /pubmed/30079223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-018-0215-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Eller, Esben
Muraro, Antonella
Dahl, Ronald
Mortz, Charlotte Gotthard
Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten
Assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments
title Assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments
title_full Assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments
title_fullStr Assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments
title_full_unstemmed Assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments
title_short Assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments
title_sort assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-018-0215-x
work_keys_str_mv AT elleresben assessingseverityofanaphylaxisadatadrivencomparisonof23instruments
AT muraroantonella assessingseverityofanaphylaxisadatadrivencomparisonof23instruments
AT dahlronald assessingseverityofanaphylaxisadatadrivencomparisonof23instruments
AT mortzcharlottegotthard assessingseverityofanaphylaxisadatadrivencomparisonof23instruments
AT bindslevjensencarsten assessingseverityofanaphylaxisadatadrivencomparisonof23instruments