Cargando…
Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of PINX1 in Various Human Tumors: A Meta-Analysis
PINX1 (Pin2/TRF1 interacting protein X1, an intrinsic telomerase inhibitor and putative tumor suppressor gene) may represent a novel prognostic tumor biomarker. However, the results of previous studies are inconsistent and the prognostic value of PINX1 remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4621015 |
_version_ | 1783343549442424832 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Hao Xiong, Zhiyong Li, Ying Kong, Weihao Yao, Zhicheng Li, Ruixi Deng, Meihai Hu, Kunpeng |
author_facet | Liang, Hao Xiong, Zhiyong Li, Ying Kong, Weihao Yao, Zhicheng Li, Ruixi Deng, Meihai Hu, Kunpeng |
author_sort | Liang, Hao |
collection | PubMed |
description | PINX1 (Pin2/TRF1 interacting protein X1, an intrinsic telomerase inhibitor and putative tumor suppressor gene) may represent a novel prognostic tumor biomarker. However, the results of previous studies are inconsistent and the prognostic value of PINX1 remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine whether PINX1 expression is associated with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with malignant tumors. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases in April 2018. Quality assessment was performed according to the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95.0% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the relationship between PINX1 expression and OS, DSS, DFS/RFS, and clinicopathological characteristics. Due to the heterogeneity across the included studies, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Fixed-effects models were used when the heterogeneity was not significant and random-effects models were used when the heterogeneity was significant. Fourteen studies of 16 cohorts including 2,624 patients were enrolled. Low PINX1 expression was associated with poor OS (HR: 1.51, 95.0% CI: 1.03–2.20; P = 0.035) and DFS/RFS (HR: 1.78, 95.0% CI: 1.28–2.47; P = 0.001) but not DSS (HR: 0.80, 95.0% CI: 0.38–1.67; P = 0.548). Low PINX1 expression was also associated with lymphatic invasion (OR: 2.23, 95.0% CI: 1.35–3.70; P = 0.002) and advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage (OR: 2.43, 95.0% CI: 1.29–4.57; P = 0.006). No significant associations were observed between low PINX1 expression and sex, depth of invasion, grade of differentiation, and distant metastasis. Low PINX1 expression was associated with poor OS and DFS/RFS and lymphatic invasion and advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage, suggesting that PINX1 expression may be a useful predictor of prognosis in patients with malignant tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6069698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60696982018-08-05 Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of PINX1 in Various Human Tumors: A Meta-Analysis Liang, Hao Xiong, Zhiyong Li, Ying Kong, Weihao Yao, Zhicheng Li, Ruixi Deng, Meihai Hu, Kunpeng Biomed Res Int Review Article PINX1 (Pin2/TRF1 interacting protein X1, an intrinsic telomerase inhibitor and putative tumor suppressor gene) may represent a novel prognostic tumor biomarker. However, the results of previous studies are inconsistent and the prognostic value of PINX1 remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine whether PINX1 expression is associated with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with malignant tumors. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases in April 2018. Quality assessment was performed according to the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95.0% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the relationship between PINX1 expression and OS, DSS, DFS/RFS, and clinicopathological characteristics. Due to the heterogeneity across the included studies, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Fixed-effects models were used when the heterogeneity was not significant and random-effects models were used when the heterogeneity was significant. Fourteen studies of 16 cohorts including 2,624 patients were enrolled. Low PINX1 expression was associated with poor OS (HR: 1.51, 95.0% CI: 1.03–2.20; P = 0.035) and DFS/RFS (HR: 1.78, 95.0% CI: 1.28–2.47; P = 0.001) but not DSS (HR: 0.80, 95.0% CI: 0.38–1.67; P = 0.548). Low PINX1 expression was also associated with lymphatic invasion (OR: 2.23, 95.0% CI: 1.35–3.70; P = 0.002) and advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage (OR: 2.43, 95.0% CI: 1.29–4.57; P = 0.006). No significant associations were observed between low PINX1 expression and sex, depth of invasion, grade of differentiation, and distant metastasis. Low PINX1 expression was associated with poor OS and DFS/RFS and lymphatic invasion and advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage, suggesting that PINX1 expression may be a useful predictor of prognosis in patients with malignant tumors. Hindawi 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6069698/ /pubmed/30079348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4621015 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hao Liang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Liang, Hao Xiong, Zhiyong Li, Ying Kong, Weihao Yao, Zhicheng Li, Ruixi Deng, Meihai Hu, Kunpeng Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of PINX1 in Various Human Tumors: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of PINX1 in Various Human Tumors: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of PINX1 in Various Human Tumors: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of PINX1 in Various Human Tumors: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of PINX1 in Various Human Tumors: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of PINX1 in Various Human Tumors: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | prognostic and clinicopathological value of pinx1 in various human tumors: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4621015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lianghao prognosticandclinicopathologicalvalueofpinx1invarioushumantumorsametaanalysis AT xiongzhiyong prognosticandclinicopathologicalvalueofpinx1invarioushumantumorsametaanalysis AT liying prognosticandclinicopathologicalvalueofpinx1invarioushumantumorsametaanalysis AT kongweihao prognosticandclinicopathologicalvalueofpinx1invarioushumantumorsametaanalysis AT yaozhicheng prognosticandclinicopathologicalvalueofpinx1invarioushumantumorsametaanalysis AT liruixi prognosticandclinicopathologicalvalueofpinx1invarioushumantumorsametaanalysis AT dengmeihai prognosticandclinicopathologicalvalueofpinx1invarioushumantumorsametaanalysis AT hukunpeng prognosticandclinicopathologicalvalueofpinx1invarioushumantumorsametaanalysis |