Cargando…

Means and ends of effective global risk assessments for genetic pest management

The development and use of genetic technologies is regulated by countries according to their national laws and governance structures. Legal frameworks require comprehensive technical evidence to be submitted by an applicant on the biology of the organism, its safety to human, animal health and the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, Geoff, Beech, Camilla, Roda, Lucia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12919-018-0112-2
_version_ 1783343561441280000
author Turner, Geoff
Beech, Camilla
Roda, Lucia
author_facet Turner, Geoff
Beech, Camilla
Roda, Lucia
author_sort Turner, Geoff
collection PubMed
description The development and use of genetic technologies is regulated by countries according to their national laws and governance structures. Legal frameworks require comprehensive technical evidence to be submitted by an applicant on the biology of the organism, its safety to human, animal health and the environment in which it will be released. Some countries also require information on socio-economic and trade impacts. One of the key elements that assists decision-making under those legal frameworks is the use of risk assessments. The risk assessment paradigm of problem formulation based on risk hypothesis, and the assessment of plausible scientific pathways leading to potential environmental and human harms being realised, has been used widely to assess potential risks of genetic technologies to human health and the environment, from crops to mosquitoes. This paper uses the case study of a genetically modified self-limiting olive fly (Bactrocera oleae) for a first deliberate release in Spain to examine the regulatory processes and stakeholders involved in the assessment of risk. It is anticipated that existing risk assessment frameworks are equally applicable to gene drive technologies that may spread and persist in the environment and cross-national borders, but it is the governance structures surrounding the involvement of civil society in regulatory processes that must be administered in a more transparent and defined manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6069755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60697552018-08-03 Means and ends of effective global risk assessments for genetic pest management Turner, Geoff Beech, Camilla Roda, Lucia BMC Proc Review The development and use of genetic technologies is regulated by countries according to their national laws and governance structures. Legal frameworks require comprehensive technical evidence to be submitted by an applicant on the biology of the organism, its safety to human, animal health and the environment in which it will be released. Some countries also require information on socio-economic and trade impacts. One of the key elements that assists decision-making under those legal frameworks is the use of risk assessments. The risk assessment paradigm of problem formulation based on risk hypothesis, and the assessment of plausible scientific pathways leading to potential environmental and human harms being realised, has been used widely to assess potential risks of genetic technologies to human health and the environment, from crops to mosquitoes. This paper uses the case study of a genetically modified self-limiting olive fly (Bactrocera oleae) for a first deliberate release in Spain to examine the regulatory processes and stakeholders involved in the assessment of risk. It is anticipated that existing risk assessment frameworks are equally applicable to gene drive technologies that may spread and persist in the environment and cross-national borders, but it is the governance structures surrounding the involvement of civil society in regulatory processes that must be administered in a more transparent and defined manner. BioMed Central 2018-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6069755/ /pubmed/30079104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12919-018-0112-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Turner, Geoff
Beech, Camilla
Roda, Lucia
Means and ends of effective global risk assessments for genetic pest management
title Means and ends of effective global risk assessments for genetic pest management
title_full Means and ends of effective global risk assessments for genetic pest management
title_fullStr Means and ends of effective global risk assessments for genetic pest management
title_full_unstemmed Means and ends of effective global risk assessments for genetic pest management
title_short Means and ends of effective global risk assessments for genetic pest management
title_sort means and ends of effective global risk assessments for genetic pest management
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12919-018-0112-2
work_keys_str_mv AT turnergeoff meansandendsofeffectiveglobalriskassessmentsforgeneticpestmanagement
AT beechcamilla meansandendsofeffectiveglobalriskassessmentsforgeneticpestmanagement
AT rodalucia meansandendsofeffectiveglobalriskassessmentsforgeneticpestmanagement