Cargando…

Clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive micropapillary carcinoma in our population and also to compare the clinico-pathologic features of metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive micropapillary carcinoma with invasive ductal carc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashmi, Atif Ali, Aijaz, Saher, Mahboob, Raeesa, Khan, Saadia Mehmood, Irfan, Muhammad, Iftikhar, Narisa, Nisar, Mariam, Siddiqui, Maham, Edhi, Muhammad Muzzammil, Faridi, Naveen, Khan, Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30064485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3623-z
_version_ 1783343565216153600
author Hashmi, Atif Ali
Aijaz, Saher
Mahboob, Raeesa
Khan, Saadia Mehmood
Irfan, Muhammad
Iftikhar, Narisa
Nisar, Mariam
Siddiqui, Maham
Edhi, Muhammad Muzzammil
Faridi, Naveen
Khan, Amir
author_facet Hashmi, Atif Ali
Aijaz, Saher
Mahboob, Raeesa
Khan, Saadia Mehmood
Irfan, Muhammad
Iftikhar, Narisa
Nisar, Mariam
Siddiqui, Maham
Edhi, Muhammad Muzzammil
Faridi, Naveen
Khan, Amir
author_sort Hashmi, Atif Ali
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive micropapillary carcinoma in our population and also to compare the clinico-pathologic features of metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive micropapillary carcinoma with invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified (IDC, NOS). RESULTS: 86.9% of the cases were identified as ductal carcinoma, NOS, while 2.2% were metaplastic and 0.76% cases were micropapillary carcinoma. Metaplastic carcinomas were found to be of higher grade as compared to IDC, NOS as 81% of metaplastic carcinoma were grade III compared to 35% IDC, NOS. 79% of metaplastic carcinoma were ER negative and 86% were PR negative, respectively as compared to ductal carcinoma NOS, which were 40% ER negative and 54% were PR. Similarly, 86.7% micropapillary cancers were ER positive and 73.3% were PR positive. Moreover, 66.7% micropapillary carcinoma showed nodal metastasis and 77.8% showed lymphovascular invasion, which was significantly higher than that of IDC, NOS micropapillary and metaplastic carcinomas accounts for less than 2 and 1% of the breast cancer burden in our population and highly correlates with poor prognosis parameters therefore, require more intensive management in our population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6069771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60697712018-08-03 Clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast Hashmi, Atif Ali Aijaz, Saher Mahboob, Raeesa Khan, Saadia Mehmood Irfan, Muhammad Iftikhar, Narisa Nisar, Mariam Siddiqui, Maham Edhi, Muhammad Muzzammil Faridi, Naveen Khan, Amir BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive micropapillary carcinoma in our population and also to compare the clinico-pathologic features of metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive micropapillary carcinoma with invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified (IDC, NOS). RESULTS: 86.9% of the cases were identified as ductal carcinoma, NOS, while 2.2% were metaplastic and 0.76% cases were micropapillary carcinoma. Metaplastic carcinomas were found to be of higher grade as compared to IDC, NOS as 81% of metaplastic carcinoma were grade III compared to 35% IDC, NOS. 79% of metaplastic carcinoma were ER negative and 86% were PR negative, respectively as compared to ductal carcinoma NOS, which were 40% ER negative and 54% were PR. Similarly, 86.7% micropapillary cancers were ER positive and 73.3% were PR positive. Moreover, 66.7% micropapillary carcinoma showed nodal metastasis and 77.8% showed lymphovascular invasion, which was significantly higher than that of IDC, NOS micropapillary and metaplastic carcinomas accounts for less than 2 and 1% of the breast cancer burden in our population and highly correlates with poor prognosis parameters therefore, require more intensive management in our population. BioMed Central 2018-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6069771/ /pubmed/30064485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3623-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Hashmi, Atif Ali
Aijaz, Saher
Mahboob, Raeesa
Khan, Saadia Mehmood
Irfan, Muhammad
Iftikhar, Narisa
Nisar, Mariam
Siddiqui, Maham
Edhi, Muhammad Muzzammil
Faridi, Naveen
Khan, Amir
Clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast
title Clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast
title_full Clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast
title_fullStr Clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast
title_full_unstemmed Clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast
title_short Clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast
title_sort clinicopathologic features of invasive metaplastic and micropapillary breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30064485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3623-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hashmiatifali clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast
AT aijazsaher clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast
AT mahboobraeesa clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast
AT khansaadiamehmood clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast
AT irfanmuhammad clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast
AT iftikharnarisa clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast
AT nisarmariam clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast
AT siddiquimaham clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast
AT edhimuhammadmuzzammil clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast
AT faridinaveen clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast
AT khanamir clinicopathologicfeaturesofinvasivemetaplasticandmicropapillarybreastcarcinomacomparisonwithinvasiveductalcarcinomaofbreast