Cargando…
Comparison between self-reported physical activity (IPAQ-SF) and pedometer among overweight and obese women in the MyBFF@home study
BACKGROUND: Several methods have been developed to determine a person’s physical activity level. However, there is limited evidence in determining whether someone is physically active or not. This study aims to determine the level of physical activity and to compare the usage of short version Intern...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30066635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0599-8 |
_version_ | 1783343572584497152 |
---|---|
author | Ahmad, Mohamad Hasnan Salleh, Ruhaya Mohamad Nor, Noor Safiza Baharuddin, Azli Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira Omar, Azahadi Jamil, Ahmad Taufik Appukutty, Mahenderan Wan Muda, Wan Abdul Manan Aris, Tahir |
author_facet | Ahmad, Mohamad Hasnan Salleh, Ruhaya Mohamad Nor, Noor Safiza Baharuddin, Azli Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira Omar, Azahadi Jamil, Ahmad Taufik Appukutty, Mahenderan Wan Muda, Wan Abdul Manan Aris, Tahir |
author_sort | Ahmad, Mohamad Hasnan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several methods have been developed to determine a person’s physical activity level. However, there is limited evidence in determining whether someone is physically active or not. This study aims to determine the level of physical activity and to compare the usage of short version International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) and pedometer among overweight and obese women who were involved in the My Body is Fit and Fabulous at home (MyBFF@home) study. METHODS: Baseline and sixth month data from the MyBFF@home study were used for this purpose. A total of 169 of overweight and obese respondents answered the IPAQ-SF and were asked to use a pedometer for 7 days. Data from IPAQ-SF were categorised as inactive and active while data from pedometer were categorised as insufficiently active and sufficiently active by standard classification. Data on sociodemographic and anthropometry were also obtained. Cohen’s kappa was applied to measure the agreement of IPAQ-SF and pedometer in determining the physical activity level. Pre-post cross tabulation table was created to evaluate the changes in physical activity over 6 months. RESULTS: From 169 available respondents, 167 (98.8%) completed the IPAQ-SF and 107 (63.3%) utilised the pedometer. A total of 102 (61.1%) respondents were categorised as active from the IPAQ-SF. Meanwhile, only 9 (8.4%) respondents were categorised as sufficiently active via pedometer. Cohen’s κ found there was a poor agreement between the two methods, κ = 0.055, p > 0.05. After sixth months, there was + 9.4% increment in respondents who were active when assessed by IPAQ-SF but − 1.3% reductions for respondents being sufficiently active when assessed by pedometer. McNemar’s test determined that there was no significant difference in the proportion of inactive and active respondents by IPAQ-SF or sufficiently active and insufficiently active by pedometer from the baseline and sixth month of intervention. CONCLUSION: The IPAQ-SF and pedometer were both able to measure physical activity. However, poor agreement between these two methods were observed among overweight and obese women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6069802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60698022018-08-03 Comparison between self-reported physical activity (IPAQ-SF) and pedometer among overweight and obese women in the MyBFF@home study Ahmad, Mohamad Hasnan Salleh, Ruhaya Mohamad Nor, Noor Safiza Baharuddin, Azli Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira Omar, Azahadi Jamil, Ahmad Taufik Appukutty, Mahenderan Wan Muda, Wan Abdul Manan Aris, Tahir BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: Several methods have been developed to determine a person’s physical activity level. However, there is limited evidence in determining whether someone is physically active or not. This study aims to determine the level of physical activity and to compare the usage of short version International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) and pedometer among overweight and obese women who were involved in the My Body is Fit and Fabulous at home (MyBFF@home) study. METHODS: Baseline and sixth month data from the MyBFF@home study were used for this purpose. A total of 169 of overweight and obese respondents answered the IPAQ-SF and were asked to use a pedometer for 7 days. Data from IPAQ-SF were categorised as inactive and active while data from pedometer were categorised as insufficiently active and sufficiently active by standard classification. Data on sociodemographic and anthropometry were also obtained. Cohen’s kappa was applied to measure the agreement of IPAQ-SF and pedometer in determining the physical activity level. Pre-post cross tabulation table was created to evaluate the changes in physical activity over 6 months. RESULTS: From 169 available respondents, 167 (98.8%) completed the IPAQ-SF and 107 (63.3%) utilised the pedometer. A total of 102 (61.1%) respondents were categorised as active from the IPAQ-SF. Meanwhile, only 9 (8.4%) respondents were categorised as sufficiently active via pedometer. Cohen’s κ found there was a poor agreement between the two methods, κ = 0.055, p > 0.05. After sixth months, there was + 9.4% increment in respondents who were active when assessed by IPAQ-SF but − 1.3% reductions for respondents being sufficiently active when assessed by pedometer. McNemar’s test determined that there was no significant difference in the proportion of inactive and active respondents by IPAQ-SF or sufficiently active and insufficiently active by pedometer from the baseline and sixth month of intervention. CONCLUSION: The IPAQ-SF and pedometer were both able to measure physical activity. However, poor agreement between these two methods were observed among overweight and obese women. BioMed Central 2018-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6069802/ /pubmed/30066635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0599-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ahmad, Mohamad Hasnan Salleh, Ruhaya Mohamad Nor, Noor Safiza Baharuddin, Azli Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira Omar, Azahadi Jamil, Ahmad Taufik Appukutty, Mahenderan Wan Muda, Wan Abdul Manan Aris, Tahir Comparison between self-reported physical activity (IPAQ-SF) and pedometer among overweight and obese women in the MyBFF@home study |
title | Comparison between self-reported physical activity (IPAQ-SF) and pedometer among overweight and obese women in the MyBFF@home study |
title_full | Comparison between self-reported physical activity (IPAQ-SF) and pedometer among overweight and obese women in the MyBFF@home study |
title_fullStr | Comparison between self-reported physical activity (IPAQ-SF) and pedometer among overweight and obese women in the MyBFF@home study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between self-reported physical activity (IPAQ-SF) and pedometer among overweight and obese women in the MyBFF@home study |
title_short | Comparison between self-reported physical activity (IPAQ-SF) and pedometer among overweight and obese women in the MyBFF@home study |
title_sort | comparison between self-reported physical activity (ipaq-sf) and pedometer among overweight and obese women in the mybff@home study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30066635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0599-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadmohamadhasnan comparisonbetweenselfreportedphysicalactivityipaqsfandpedometeramongoverweightandobesewomeninthemybffhomestudy AT sallehruhaya comparisonbetweenselfreportedphysicalactivityipaqsfandpedometeramongoverweightandobesewomeninthemybffhomestudy AT mohamadnornoorsafiza comparisonbetweenselfreportedphysicalactivityipaqsfandpedometeramongoverweightandobesewomeninthemybffhomestudy AT baharuddinazli comparisonbetweenselfreportedphysicalactivityipaqsfandpedometeramongoverweightandobesewomeninthemybffhomestudy AT rodzlanhasaniwanshakira comparisonbetweenselfreportedphysicalactivityipaqsfandpedometeramongoverweightandobesewomeninthemybffhomestudy AT omarazahadi comparisonbetweenselfreportedphysicalactivityipaqsfandpedometeramongoverweightandobesewomeninthemybffhomestudy AT jamilahmadtaufik comparisonbetweenselfreportedphysicalactivityipaqsfandpedometeramongoverweightandobesewomeninthemybffhomestudy AT appukuttymahenderan comparisonbetweenselfreportedphysicalactivityipaqsfandpedometeramongoverweightandobesewomeninthemybffhomestudy AT wanmudawanabdulmanan comparisonbetweenselfreportedphysicalactivityipaqsfandpedometeramongoverweightandobesewomeninthemybffhomestudy AT aristahir comparisonbetweenselfreportedphysicalactivityipaqsfandpedometeramongoverweightandobesewomeninthemybffhomestudy |