Cargando…

Testing of a synthetic phonics-based targeted reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in Year 1: protocol for an efficacy randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Literacy is fundamental for educational achievement, and in the longer term contributes substantially to a range of life skills. Literacy difficulties during the early years of school are associated with long-term impacts on academic success, with differences in academic achievement su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quach, Jon, Clinton, Janet, Dawson, Georgia, Smith, Libby, Serry, Tanya, Goldfeld, Sharon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000301
_version_ 1783343594407460864
author Quach, Jon
Clinton, Janet
Dawson, Georgia
Smith, Libby
Serry, Tanya
Goldfeld, Sharon
author_facet Quach, Jon
Clinton, Janet
Dawson, Georgia
Smith, Libby
Serry, Tanya
Goldfeld, Sharon
author_sort Quach, Jon
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Literacy is fundamental for educational achievement, and in the longer term contributes substantially to a range of life skills. Literacy difficulties during the early years of school are associated with long-term impacts on academic success, with differences in academic achievement sustained through children’s schooling. Therefore, addressing literacy difficulties during the early years of school is essential in reducing the risk of children progressing onto negative academic, psychosocial and vocational trajectories. This trial will determine whether a phonics-based reading intervention can improve the reading comprehension of students identified as low-progress readers in the second year of primary school. METHODS/DESIGN: We recruited 236 students fromnine schools after screening for reading difficulties in the second year of primary school (Year 1). Schools in Sydney and Central Coast of New South Wales will be invited to participate via an opt-out consent process. All children identified as being in the bottom 25th percentile using the Wheldall Assessment of Reading Lists will be eligible for the trial. These children will be randomised into either ‘usual teaching’ or ‘intervention’ groups. Trained school support teachers will deliver the MiniLit intervention. Intervention: In groups of four, children will complete a daily 1-hour lesson with their MiniLit teacher over 20 school weeks. Follow-up: Immediately after intervention completion and 6 months later using child face-to-face assessments. Primary outcome: Reading comprehension at 6 months after intervention completion. The study will have an embedded process and cost-effectiveness evaluation. DISCUSSION: The Building Better Readers trial will be the first efficacy randomised controlled trial comparing usual teaching with a phonics-based reading intervention for children with reading difficulties in Year 1 of primary school in Australia. The randomised design will limit the effect of bias on outcomes seen in other studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000179336
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6069903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60699032018-08-09 Testing of a synthetic phonics-based targeted reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in Year 1: protocol for an efficacy randomised controlled trial Quach, Jon Clinton, Janet Dawson, Georgia Smith, Libby Serry, Tanya Goldfeld, Sharon BMJ Paediatr Open Protocol INTRODUCTION: Literacy is fundamental for educational achievement, and in the longer term contributes substantially to a range of life skills. Literacy difficulties during the early years of school are associated with long-term impacts on academic success, with differences in academic achievement sustained through children’s schooling. Therefore, addressing literacy difficulties during the early years of school is essential in reducing the risk of children progressing onto negative academic, psychosocial and vocational trajectories. This trial will determine whether a phonics-based reading intervention can improve the reading comprehension of students identified as low-progress readers in the second year of primary school. METHODS/DESIGN: We recruited 236 students fromnine schools after screening for reading difficulties in the second year of primary school (Year 1). Schools in Sydney and Central Coast of New South Wales will be invited to participate via an opt-out consent process. All children identified as being in the bottom 25th percentile using the Wheldall Assessment of Reading Lists will be eligible for the trial. These children will be randomised into either ‘usual teaching’ or ‘intervention’ groups. Trained school support teachers will deliver the MiniLit intervention. Intervention: In groups of four, children will complete a daily 1-hour lesson with their MiniLit teacher over 20 school weeks. Follow-up: Immediately after intervention completion and 6 months later using child face-to-face assessments. Primary outcome: Reading comprehension at 6 months after intervention completion. The study will have an embedded process and cost-effectiveness evaluation. DISCUSSION: The Building Better Readers trial will be the first efficacy randomised controlled trial comparing usual teaching with a phonics-based reading intervention for children with reading difficulties in Year 1 of primary school in Australia. The randomised design will limit the effect of bias on outcomes seen in other studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000179336 BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6069903/ /pubmed/30094349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000301 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Protocol
Quach, Jon
Clinton, Janet
Dawson, Georgia
Smith, Libby
Serry, Tanya
Goldfeld, Sharon
Testing of a synthetic phonics-based targeted reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in Year 1: protocol for an efficacy randomised controlled trial
title Testing of a synthetic phonics-based targeted reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in Year 1: protocol for an efficacy randomised controlled trial
title_full Testing of a synthetic phonics-based targeted reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in Year 1: protocol for an efficacy randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Testing of a synthetic phonics-based targeted reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in Year 1: protocol for an efficacy randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Testing of a synthetic phonics-based targeted reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in Year 1: protocol for an efficacy randomised controlled trial
title_short Testing of a synthetic phonics-based targeted reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in Year 1: protocol for an efficacy randomised controlled trial
title_sort testing of a synthetic phonics-based targeted reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in year 1: protocol for an efficacy randomised controlled trial
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000301
work_keys_str_mv AT quachjon testingofasyntheticphonicsbasedtargetedreadinginterventionforstudentswithreadingdifficultiesinyear1protocolforanefficacyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clintonjanet testingofasyntheticphonicsbasedtargetedreadinginterventionforstudentswithreadingdifficultiesinyear1protocolforanefficacyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dawsongeorgia testingofasyntheticphonicsbasedtargetedreadinginterventionforstudentswithreadingdifficultiesinyear1protocolforanefficacyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smithlibby testingofasyntheticphonicsbasedtargetedreadinginterventionforstudentswithreadingdifficultiesinyear1protocolforanefficacyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT serrytanya testingofasyntheticphonicsbasedtargetedreadinginterventionforstudentswithreadingdifficultiesinyear1protocolforanefficacyrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT goldfeldsharon testingofasyntheticphonicsbasedtargetedreadinginterventionforstudentswithreadingdifficultiesinyear1protocolforanefficacyrandomisedcontrolledtrial