Cargando…
Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process
30-day readmissions for patients at skilled nursing facilities (SNF) are common and preventable. We implemented a readmission review process for patients readmitted from two SNFs, involving an electronic review tool and monthly conferences. The electronic review tool captures information related to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000245 |
_version_ | 1783343595589206016 |
---|---|
author | Mendu, Mallika L Michaelidis, Constantinos I Chu, Michele C Sahota, Jasdeep Hauser, Lauren Fay, Emily Smith, Aimee Huether, Mary Ann Dobija, John Yurkofsky, Mark Pu, Charles T Britton, Kathryn |
author_facet | Mendu, Mallika L Michaelidis, Constantinos I Chu, Michele C Sahota, Jasdeep Hauser, Lauren Fay, Emily Smith, Aimee Huether, Mary Ann Dobija, John Yurkofsky, Mark Pu, Charles T Britton, Kathryn |
author_sort | Mendu, Mallika L |
collection | PubMed |
description | 30-day readmissions for patients at skilled nursing facilities (SNF) are common and preventable. We implemented a readmission review process for patients readmitted from two SNFs, involving an electronic review tool and monthly conferences. The electronic review tool captures information related to preventability and factors contributing to readmission. The study included 128 patients, readmitted within 30 days from 1 October 2015 through 1 May 2017, at a tertiary care academic medical centre in Boston, MA, and two partnering SNFs. There was a discrepancy in preventability rating between SNF and hospital reviewers, with 79.7% of cases rated not preventable by the SNF, and 58.6% by the hospital. There was moderate positive correlation between the hospital’s and SNFs’ preventability ratings (r(s)=0.652, p<0.001). In most cases, the SNF reviewers felt that no factors contributed (57.8%), and hospital reviewers felt that issues with end-of-life planning (14.1%) and medical complexity (12.5%) were major factors. Despite the lack of strong correlation between SNF and hospital responses, several cross-continuum quality improvement projects were developed. We found that implementation of a SNF readmission review process employing bidirectional review by SNF and hospital was feasible, and facilitated systems-based improvement in the transition from hospital to postacute care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6069909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60699092018-08-09 Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process Mendu, Mallika L Michaelidis, Constantinos I Chu, Michele C Sahota, Jasdeep Hauser, Lauren Fay, Emily Smith, Aimee Huether, Mary Ann Dobija, John Yurkofsky, Mark Pu, Charles T Britton, Kathryn BMJ Open Qual Original Article 30-day readmissions for patients at skilled nursing facilities (SNF) are common and preventable. We implemented a readmission review process for patients readmitted from two SNFs, involving an electronic review tool and monthly conferences. The electronic review tool captures information related to preventability and factors contributing to readmission. The study included 128 patients, readmitted within 30 days from 1 October 2015 through 1 May 2017, at a tertiary care academic medical centre in Boston, MA, and two partnering SNFs. There was a discrepancy in preventability rating between SNF and hospital reviewers, with 79.7% of cases rated not preventable by the SNF, and 58.6% by the hospital. There was moderate positive correlation between the hospital’s and SNFs’ preventability ratings (r(s)=0.652, p<0.001). In most cases, the SNF reviewers felt that no factors contributed (57.8%), and hospital reviewers felt that issues with end-of-life planning (14.1%) and medical complexity (12.5%) were major factors. Despite the lack of strong correlation between SNF and hospital responses, several cross-continuum quality improvement projects were developed. We found that implementation of a SNF readmission review process employing bidirectional review by SNF and hospital was feasible, and facilitated systems-based improvement in the transition from hospital to postacute care. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6069909/ /pubmed/30094344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000245 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mendu, Mallika L Michaelidis, Constantinos I Chu, Michele C Sahota, Jasdeep Hauser, Lauren Fay, Emily Smith, Aimee Huether, Mary Ann Dobija, John Yurkofsky, Mark Pu, Charles T Britton, Kathryn Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process |
title | Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process |
title_full | Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process |
title_fullStr | Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process |
title_short | Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process |
title_sort | implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mendumallikal implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT michaelidisconstantinosi implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT chumichelec implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT sahotajasdeep implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT hauserlauren implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT fayemily implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT smithaimee implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT huethermaryann implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT dobijajohn implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT yurkofskymark implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT pucharlest implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess AT brittonkathryn implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess |