Cargando…

Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process

30-day readmissions for patients at skilled nursing facilities (SNF) are common and preventable. We implemented a readmission review process for patients readmitted from two SNFs, involving an electronic review tool and monthly conferences. The electronic review tool captures information related to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendu, Mallika L, Michaelidis, Constantinos I, Chu, Michele C, Sahota, Jasdeep, Hauser, Lauren, Fay, Emily, Smith, Aimee, Huether, Mary Ann, Dobija, John, Yurkofsky, Mark, Pu, Charles T, Britton, Kathryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000245
_version_ 1783343595589206016
author Mendu, Mallika L
Michaelidis, Constantinos I
Chu, Michele C
Sahota, Jasdeep
Hauser, Lauren
Fay, Emily
Smith, Aimee
Huether, Mary Ann
Dobija, John
Yurkofsky, Mark
Pu, Charles T
Britton, Kathryn
author_facet Mendu, Mallika L
Michaelidis, Constantinos I
Chu, Michele C
Sahota, Jasdeep
Hauser, Lauren
Fay, Emily
Smith, Aimee
Huether, Mary Ann
Dobija, John
Yurkofsky, Mark
Pu, Charles T
Britton, Kathryn
author_sort Mendu, Mallika L
collection PubMed
description 30-day readmissions for patients at skilled nursing facilities (SNF) are common and preventable. We implemented a readmission review process for patients readmitted from two SNFs, involving an electronic review tool and monthly conferences. The electronic review tool captures information related to preventability and factors contributing to readmission. The study included 128 patients, readmitted within 30 days from 1 October 2015 through 1 May 2017, at a tertiary care academic medical centre in Boston, MA, and two partnering SNFs. There was a discrepancy in preventability rating between SNF and hospital reviewers, with 79.7% of cases rated not preventable by the SNF, and 58.6% by the hospital. There was moderate positive correlation between the hospital’s and SNFs’ preventability ratings (r(s)=0.652, p<0.001). In most cases, the SNF reviewers felt that no factors contributed (57.8%), and hospital reviewers felt that issues with end-of-life planning (14.1%) and medical complexity (12.5%) were major factors. Despite the lack of strong correlation between SNF and hospital responses, several cross-continuum quality improvement projects were developed. We found that implementation of a SNF readmission review process employing bidirectional review by SNF and hospital was feasible, and facilitated systems-based improvement in the transition from hospital to postacute care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6069909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60699092018-08-09 Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process Mendu, Mallika L Michaelidis, Constantinos I Chu, Michele C Sahota, Jasdeep Hauser, Lauren Fay, Emily Smith, Aimee Huether, Mary Ann Dobija, John Yurkofsky, Mark Pu, Charles T Britton, Kathryn BMJ Open Qual Original Article 30-day readmissions for patients at skilled nursing facilities (SNF) are common and preventable. We implemented a readmission review process for patients readmitted from two SNFs, involving an electronic review tool and monthly conferences. The electronic review tool captures information related to preventability and factors contributing to readmission. The study included 128 patients, readmitted within 30 days from 1 October 2015 through 1 May 2017, at a tertiary care academic medical centre in Boston, MA, and two partnering SNFs. There was a discrepancy in preventability rating between SNF and hospital reviewers, with 79.7% of cases rated not preventable by the SNF, and 58.6% by the hospital. There was moderate positive correlation between the hospital’s and SNFs’ preventability ratings (r(s)=0.652, p<0.001). In most cases, the SNF reviewers felt that no factors contributed (57.8%), and hospital reviewers felt that issues with end-of-life planning (14.1%) and medical complexity (12.5%) were major factors. Despite the lack of strong correlation between SNF and hospital responses, several cross-continuum quality improvement projects were developed. We found that implementation of a SNF readmission review process employing bidirectional review by SNF and hospital was feasible, and facilitated systems-based improvement in the transition from hospital to postacute care. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6069909/ /pubmed/30094344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000245 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mendu, Mallika L
Michaelidis, Constantinos I
Chu, Michele C
Sahota, Jasdeep
Hauser, Lauren
Fay, Emily
Smith, Aimee
Huether, Mary Ann
Dobija, John
Yurkofsky, Mark
Pu, Charles T
Britton, Kathryn
Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process
title Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process
title_full Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process
title_fullStr Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process
title_short Implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process
title_sort implementation of a skilled nursing facility readmission review process
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000245
work_keys_str_mv AT mendumallikal implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT michaelidisconstantinosi implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT chumichelec implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT sahotajasdeep implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT hauserlauren implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT fayemily implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT smithaimee implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT huethermaryann implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT dobijajohn implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT yurkofskymark implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT pucharlest implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess
AT brittonkathryn implementationofaskillednursingfacilityreadmissionreviewprocess