Cargando…

Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle

STUDY QUESTION: Are the mean numbers of blastocysts obtained from sibling cohorts of oocytes recruited after follicular phase and luteal phase stimulations (FPS and LPS) in the same ovarian cycle similar? SUMMARY ANSWER: The cohorts of oocytes obtained after LPS are larger than their paired-FPS-deri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cimadomo, Danilo, Vaiarelli, Alberto, Colamaria, Silvia, Trabucco, Elisabetta, Alviggi, Carlo, Venturella, Roberta, Alviggi, Erminia, Carmelo, Ramona, Rienzi, Laura, Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29912374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey217
_version_ 1783343623453016064
author Cimadomo, Danilo
Vaiarelli, Alberto
Colamaria, Silvia
Trabucco, Elisabetta
Alviggi, Carlo
Venturella, Roberta
Alviggi, Erminia
Carmelo, Ramona
Rienzi, Laura
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
author_facet Cimadomo, Danilo
Vaiarelli, Alberto
Colamaria, Silvia
Trabucco, Elisabetta
Alviggi, Carlo
Venturella, Roberta
Alviggi, Erminia
Carmelo, Ramona
Rienzi, Laura
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
author_sort Cimadomo, Danilo
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: Are the mean numbers of blastocysts obtained from sibling cohorts of oocytes recruited after follicular phase and luteal phase stimulations (FPS and LPS) in the same ovarian cycle similar? SUMMARY ANSWER: The cohorts of oocytes obtained after LPS are larger than their paired-FPS-derived cohorts and show a comparable competence, thus resulting in a larger mean number of blastocysts. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Three theories of follicle recruitment have been postulated to date: (i) the ‘continuous recruitment’ theory, (ii) the ‘single recruitment episode’ theory and (iii) the ‘wave’ theory. Yet, a clear characterization of this crucial biological process for human reproduction is missing. Recent advances implemented in in vitro fertilization (IVF), such as blastocyst culture, aneuploidy testing and vitrification, have encouraged clinicians to maximize the exploitation of the ovarian reserve through tailored stimulation protocols, which is crucial especially for poor prognosis patients aiming to conceive after IVF. LPS has been already successfully adopted to treat poor prognosis or oncological patients through Duostim, LPS-only or random-start ovarian stimulation approaches. Nevertheless, little, and mainly retrospective, evidence has been produced to support the safety of LPS in general. Feasibility of the LPS approach would severely question the classic ‘single recruitment episode’ theory of follicular development. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This case-control study was conducted with paired follicular phase- and luteal phase-derived cohorts of oocytes collected after stimulations in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim) at two private IVF clinics between October 2015 and December 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study included 188 poor prognosis patients undergoing DuoStim with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). FPS and LPS were performed with the same daily dose of recombinant-gonadotrophins in an antagonist protocol. Blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, vitrification and frozen-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfers were performed. The primary outcome was the mean number of blastocysts obtained per oocyte retrieval from paired-FPS- and LPS-derived cohorts (required sample size = 165 patients; power = 90%). Mean blastulation and euploidy rates were monitored, along with the number of oocytes, euploid blastocysts and clinical outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Significantly fewer blastocysts were obtained after FPS than LPS (1.2 ± 1.1 vs. 1.6 ± 1.6, P < 0.01), due to fewer oocytes collected (3.6 ± 2.1 vs. 4.3 ± 2.8, P < 0.01) and a similar mean blastocyst rates per retrieval (33.1% ± 30.3% vs. 37.4% ± 30.8%, P = NS). The number of oocytes collected were correlated (R = 0.5, P < 0.01), while the blastocyst rates were uncorrelated among paired-FPS- and LPS-derived cohorts. Overall, a significantly lower chance of producing blastocyst(s) was reported after FPS than after LPS: 67.6% (n = 127/188, 95%CI: 60.3–74.1) vs. 77.1% (n = 145/188, 95%CI: 70.3–82.8; P = 0.05). The mean euploidy rates per retrieval were similar between FPS- and LPS-derived cohorts of oocytes (13.6% ± 22.8% vs. 16.3% ± 23.4%, P = NS). Therefore, on average fewer euploid blastocysts (0.5 ± 0.8 vs. 0.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.02) resulted from FPS. Similar ongoing-pregnancy/delivery rates were reported, to date, after FPS- and LPS-derived euploid single blastocyst transfers: 42.4% (n = 28/66, 95%CI: 30.5–55.2) vs. 53.8% (n = 35/65, 95%CI: 41.1–66.1; P = NS). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: More studies need to be conducted in the future to confirm the safety of LPS, especially in terms of ovarian and follicular environment, as well as the clinical, peri-natal and post-natal outcomes. Here, we showed preliminary data suggesting a similar ongoing implantation/delivery rate (>22 weeks) between FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocysts, that need to be extended in the future, to populations other than poor prognosis patients and using approaches other than DuoStim together with a constant monitoring of the related peri-natal and post-natal outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These data, from a paired study design, highlight that LPS-derived oocytes are as competent as FPS-derived oocytes, thereby adding some evidence to support the use of LPS for poor prognosis and oncological patients and to question the ‘single recruitment episode’ theory of follicle recruitment. These findings also encourage additional studies of the basics of folliculogenesis, with direct clinical implications for the management of ovarian stimulation in IVF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: None. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funds were used for this study and there are no conflicts of interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6070116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60701162018-08-09 Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle Cimadomo, Danilo Vaiarelli, Alberto Colamaria, Silvia Trabucco, Elisabetta Alviggi, Carlo Venturella, Roberta Alviggi, Erminia Carmelo, Ramona Rienzi, Laura Ubaldi, Filippo Maria Hum Reprod Original Article STUDY QUESTION: Are the mean numbers of blastocysts obtained from sibling cohorts of oocytes recruited after follicular phase and luteal phase stimulations (FPS and LPS) in the same ovarian cycle similar? SUMMARY ANSWER: The cohorts of oocytes obtained after LPS are larger than their paired-FPS-derived cohorts and show a comparable competence, thus resulting in a larger mean number of blastocysts. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Three theories of follicle recruitment have been postulated to date: (i) the ‘continuous recruitment’ theory, (ii) the ‘single recruitment episode’ theory and (iii) the ‘wave’ theory. Yet, a clear characterization of this crucial biological process for human reproduction is missing. Recent advances implemented in in vitro fertilization (IVF), such as blastocyst culture, aneuploidy testing and vitrification, have encouraged clinicians to maximize the exploitation of the ovarian reserve through tailored stimulation protocols, which is crucial especially for poor prognosis patients aiming to conceive after IVF. LPS has been already successfully adopted to treat poor prognosis or oncological patients through Duostim, LPS-only or random-start ovarian stimulation approaches. Nevertheless, little, and mainly retrospective, evidence has been produced to support the safety of LPS in general. Feasibility of the LPS approach would severely question the classic ‘single recruitment episode’ theory of follicular development. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This case-control study was conducted with paired follicular phase- and luteal phase-derived cohorts of oocytes collected after stimulations in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim) at two private IVF clinics between October 2015 and December 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study included 188 poor prognosis patients undergoing DuoStim with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). FPS and LPS were performed with the same daily dose of recombinant-gonadotrophins in an antagonist protocol. Blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, vitrification and frozen-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfers were performed. The primary outcome was the mean number of blastocysts obtained per oocyte retrieval from paired-FPS- and LPS-derived cohorts (required sample size = 165 patients; power = 90%). Mean blastulation and euploidy rates were monitored, along with the number of oocytes, euploid blastocysts and clinical outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Significantly fewer blastocysts were obtained after FPS than LPS (1.2 ± 1.1 vs. 1.6 ± 1.6, P < 0.01), due to fewer oocytes collected (3.6 ± 2.1 vs. 4.3 ± 2.8, P < 0.01) and a similar mean blastocyst rates per retrieval (33.1% ± 30.3% vs. 37.4% ± 30.8%, P = NS). The number of oocytes collected were correlated (R = 0.5, P < 0.01), while the blastocyst rates were uncorrelated among paired-FPS- and LPS-derived cohorts. Overall, a significantly lower chance of producing blastocyst(s) was reported after FPS than after LPS: 67.6% (n = 127/188, 95%CI: 60.3–74.1) vs. 77.1% (n = 145/188, 95%CI: 70.3–82.8; P = 0.05). The mean euploidy rates per retrieval were similar between FPS- and LPS-derived cohorts of oocytes (13.6% ± 22.8% vs. 16.3% ± 23.4%, P = NS). Therefore, on average fewer euploid blastocysts (0.5 ± 0.8 vs. 0.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.02) resulted from FPS. Similar ongoing-pregnancy/delivery rates were reported, to date, after FPS- and LPS-derived euploid single blastocyst transfers: 42.4% (n = 28/66, 95%CI: 30.5–55.2) vs. 53.8% (n = 35/65, 95%CI: 41.1–66.1; P = NS). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: More studies need to be conducted in the future to confirm the safety of LPS, especially in terms of ovarian and follicular environment, as well as the clinical, peri-natal and post-natal outcomes. Here, we showed preliminary data suggesting a similar ongoing implantation/delivery rate (>22 weeks) between FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocysts, that need to be extended in the future, to populations other than poor prognosis patients and using approaches other than DuoStim together with a constant monitoring of the related peri-natal and post-natal outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These data, from a paired study design, highlight that LPS-derived oocytes are as competent as FPS-derived oocytes, thereby adding some evidence to support the use of LPS for poor prognosis and oncological patients and to question the ‘single recruitment episode’ theory of follicle recruitment. These findings also encourage additional studies of the basics of folliculogenesis, with direct clinical implications for the management of ovarian stimulation in IVF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: None. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funds were used for this study and there are no conflicts of interest. Oxford University Press 2018-08 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6070116/ /pubmed/29912374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey217 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Cimadomo, Danilo
Vaiarelli, Alberto
Colamaria, Silvia
Trabucco, Elisabetta
Alviggi, Carlo
Venturella, Roberta
Alviggi, Erminia
Carmelo, Ramona
Rienzi, Laura
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle
title Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle
title_full Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle
title_fullStr Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle
title_full_unstemmed Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle
title_short Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle
title_sort luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29912374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey217
work_keys_str_mv AT cimadomodanilo lutealphaseanovulatoryfolliclesresultintheproductionofcompetentoocytesintrapatientpairedcasecontrolstudycomparingfollicularversuslutealphasestimulationsinthesameovariancycle
AT vaiarellialberto lutealphaseanovulatoryfolliclesresultintheproductionofcompetentoocytesintrapatientpairedcasecontrolstudycomparingfollicularversuslutealphasestimulationsinthesameovariancycle
AT colamariasilvia lutealphaseanovulatoryfolliclesresultintheproductionofcompetentoocytesintrapatientpairedcasecontrolstudycomparingfollicularversuslutealphasestimulationsinthesameovariancycle
AT trabuccoelisabetta lutealphaseanovulatoryfolliclesresultintheproductionofcompetentoocytesintrapatientpairedcasecontrolstudycomparingfollicularversuslutealphasestimulationsinthesameovariancycle
AT alviggicarlo lutealphaseanovulatoryfolliclesresultintheproductionofcompetentoocytesintrapatientpairedcasecontrolstudycomparingfollicularversuslutealphasestimulationsinthesameovariancycle
AT venturellaroberta lutealphaseanovulatoryfolliclesresultintheproductionofcompetentoocytesintrapatientpairedcasecontrolstudycomparingfollicularversuslutealphasestimulationsinthesameovariancycle
AT alviggierminia lutealphaseanovulatoryfolliclesresultintheproductionofcompetentoocytesintrapatientpairedcasecontrolstudycomparingfollicularversuslutealphasestimulationsinthesameovariancycle
AT carmeloramona lutealphaseanovulatoryfolliclesresultintheproductionofcompetentoocytesintrapatientpairedcasecontrolstudycomparingfollicularversuslutealphasestimulationsinthesameovariancycle
AT rienzilaura lutealphaseanovulatoryfolliclesresultintheproductionofcompetentoocytesintrapatientpairedcasecontrolstudycomparingfollicularversuslutealphasestimulationsinthesameovariancycle
AT ubaldifilippomaria lutealphaseanovulatoryfolliclesresultintheproductionofcompetentoocytesintrapatientpairedcasecontrolstudycomparingfollicularversuslutealphasestimulationsinthesameovariancycle