Cargando…
Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier
Pain recognition is fundamental for safeguarding animal welfare. Facial expressions have been investigated in several species and grimace scales have been developed as pain assessment tool in many species including horses (HGS) and mice (MGS). This study is intended to progress the validation of gri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30067759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200339 |
_version_ | 1783343632424632320 |
---|---|
author | Dalla Costa, Emanuela Pascuzzo, Riccardo Leach, Matthew C. Dai, Francesca Lebelt, Dirk Vantini, Simone Minero, Michela |
author_facet | Dalla Costa, Emanuela Pascuzzo, Riccardo Leach, Matthew C. Dai, Francesca Lebelt, Dirk Vantini, Simone Minero, Michela |
author_sort | Dalla Costa, Emanuela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pain recognition is fundamental for safeguarding animal welfare. Facial expressions have been investigated in several species and grimace scales have been developed as pain assessment tool in many species including horses (HGS) and mice (MGS). This study is intended to progress the validation of grimace scales, by proposing a statistical approach to identify a classifier that can estimate the pain status of the animal based on Facial Action Units (FAUs) included in HGS and MGS. To achieve this aim, through a validity study, the relation between FAUs included in HGS and MGS and the real pain condition was investigated. A specific statistical approach (Cumulative Link Mixed Model, Inter-rater reliability, Multiple Correspondence Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machines) was applied to two datasets. Our results confirm the reliability of both scales and show that individual FAU scores of HGS and MGS are related to the pain state of the animal. Finally, we identified the optimal weights of the FAU scores that can be used to best classify animals in pain with an accuracy greater than 70%. For the first time, this study describes a statistical approach to develop a classifier, based on HGS and MGS, for estimating the pain status of animals. The classifier proposed is the starting point to develop a computer-based image analysis for the automatic recognition of pain in horses and mice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6070187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60701872018-08-09 Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier Dalla Costa, Emanuela Pascuzzo, Riccardo Leach, Matthew C. Dai, Francesca Lebelt, Dirk Vantini, Simone Minero, Michela PLoS One Research Article Pain recognition is fundamental for safeguarding animal welfare. Facial expressions have been investigated in several species and grimace scales have been developed as pain assessment tool in many species including horses (HGS) and mice (MGS). This study is intended to progress the validation of grimace scales, by proposing a statistical approach to identify a classifier that can estimate the pain status of the animal based on Facial Action Units (FAUs) included in HGS and MGS. To achieve this aim, through a validity study, the relation between FAUs included in HGS and MGS and the real pain condition was investigated. A specific statistical approach (Cumulative Link Mixed Model, Inter-rater reliability, Multiple Correspondence Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machines) was applied to two datasets. Our results confirm the reliability of both scales and show that individual FAU scores of HGS and MGS are related to the pain state of the animal. Finally, we identified the optimal weights of the FAU scores that can be used to best classify animals in pain with an accuracy greater than 70%. For the first time, this study describes a statistical approach to develop a classifier, based on HGS and MGS, for estimating the pain status of animals. The classifier proposed is the starting point to develop a computer-based image analysis for the automatic recognition of pain in horses and mice. Public Library of Science 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6070187/ /pubmed/30067759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200339 Text en © 2018 Dalla Costa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dalla Costa, Emanuela Pascuzzo, Riccardo Leach, Matthew C. Dai, Francesca Lebelt, Dirk Vantini, Simone Minero, Michela Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier |
title | Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier |
title_full | Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier |
title_fullStr | Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier |
title_full_unstemmed | Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier |
title_short | Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier |
title_sort | can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? a statistical approach to identify a classifier |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30067759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dallacostaemanuela cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier AT pascuzzoriccardo cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier AT leachmatthewc cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier AT daifrancesca cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier AT lebeltdirk cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier AT vantinisimone cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier AT mineromichela cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier |