Cargando…

Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier

Pain recognition is fundamental for safeguarding animal welfare. Facial expressions have been investigated in several species and grimace scales have been developed as pain assessment tool in many species including horses (HGS) and mice (MGS). This study is intended to progress the validation of gri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalla Costa, Emanuela, Pascuzzo, Riccardo, Leach, Matthew C., Dai, Francesca, Lebelt, Dirk, Vantini, Simone, Minero, Michela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30067759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200339
_version_ 1783343632424632320
author Dalla Costa, Emanuela
Pascuzzo, Riccardo
Leach, Matthew C.
Dai, Francesca
Lebelt, Dirk
Vantini, Simone
Minero, Michela
author_facet Dalla Costa, Emanuela
Pascuzzo, Riccardo
Leach, Matthew C.
Dai, Francesca
Lebelt, Dirk
Vantini, Simone
Minero, Michela
author_sort Dalla Costa, Emanuela
collection PubMed
description Pain recognition is fundamental for safeguarding animal welfare. Facial expressions have been investigated in several species and grimace scales have been developed as pain assessment tool in many species including horses (HGS) and mice (MGS). This study is intended to progress the validation of grimace scales, by proposing a statistical approach to identify a classifier that can estimate the pain status of the animal based on Facial Action Units (FAUs) included in HGS and MGS. To achieve this aim, through a validity study, the relation between FAUs included in HGS and MGS and the real pain condition was investigated. A specific statistical approach (Cumulative Link Mixed Model, Inter-rater reliability, Multiple Correspondence Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machines) was applied to two datasets. Our results confirm the reliability of both scales and show that individual FAU scores of HGS and MGS are related to the pain state of the animal. Finally, we identified the optimal weights of the FAU scores that can be used to best classify animals in pain with an accuracy greater than 70%. For the first time, this study describes a statistical approach to develop a classifier, based on HGS and MGS, for estimating the pain status of animals. The classifier proposed is the starting point to develop a computer-based image analysis for the automatic recognition of pain in horses and mice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6070187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60701872018-08-09 Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier Dalla Costa, Emanuela Pascuzzo, Riccardo Leach, Matthew C. Dai, Francesca Lebelt, Dirk Vantini, Simone Minero, Michela PLoS One Research Article Pain recognition is fundamental for safeguarding animal welfare. Facial expressions have been investigated in several species and grimace scales have been developed as pain assessment tool in many species including horses (HGS) and mice (MGS). This study is intended to progress the validation of grimace scales, by proposing a statistical approach to identify a classifier that can estimate the pain status of the animal based on Facial Action Units (FAUs) included in HGS and MGS. To achieve this aim, through a validity study, the relation between FAUs included in HGS and MGS and the real pain condition was investigated. A specific statistical approach (Cumulative Link Mixed Model, Inter-rater reliability, Multiple Correspondence Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machines) was applied to two datasets. Our results confirm the reliability of both scales and show that individual FAU scores of HGS and MGS are related to the pain state of the animal. Finally, we identified the optimal weights of the FAU scores that can be used to best classify animals in pain with an accuracy greater than 70%. For the first time, this study describes a statistical approach to develop a classifier, based on HGS and MGS, for estimating the pain status of animals. The classifier proposed is the starting point to develop a computer-based image analysis for the automatic recognition of pain in horses and mice. Public Library of Science 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6070187/ /pubmed/30067759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200339 Text en © 2018 Dalla Costa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dalla Costa, Emanuela
Pascuzzo, Riccardo
Leach, Matthew C.
Dai, Francesca
Lebelt, Dirk
Vantini, Simone
Minero, Michela
Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier
title Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier
title_full Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier
title_fullStr Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier
title_full_unstemmed Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier
title_short Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier
title_sort can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? a statistical approach to identify a classifier
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30067759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200339
work_keys_str_mv AT dallacostaemanuela cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier
AT pascuzzoriccardo cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier
AT leachmatthewc cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier
AT daifrancesca cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier
AT lebeltdirk cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier
AT vantinisimone cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier
AT mineromichela cangrimacescalesestimatethepainstatusinhorsesandmiceastatisticalapproachtoidentifyaclassifier