Cargando…

Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication

INTRODUCTION: Communication interventions are widely used to promote childhood vaccination and sustain vaccine acceptance, but communication’s role in changing people’s beliefs and behaviours is not well understood. To determine why these interventions work or where they fail, evaluations must measu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaufman, Jessica, Ryan, Rebecca, Hill, Sophie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30067802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201145
_version_ 1783343648343064576
author Kaufman, Jessica
Ryan, Rebecca
Hill, Sophie
author_facet Kaufman, Jessica
Ryan, Rebecca
Hill, Sophie
author_sort Kaufman, Jessica
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Communication interventions are widely used to promote childhood vaccination and sustain vaccine acceptance, but communication’s role in changing people’s beliefs and behaviours is not well understood. To determine why these interventions work or where they fail, evaluations must measure a range of outcomes in addition to vaccination uptake. As part of a larger project to develop a preliminary Core Outcome Set for vaccination communication, we conducted a qualitative focus group study exploring how parents and health professionals perceive and experience communication encounters and what outcomes are relevant to them. METHODS: Focus group participants included parents and health professionals involved in vaccination communication (healthcare providers, researchers and policymakers). Participants discussed their experiences with communication for childhood vaccination, and what made the communication ‘successful’ or 'unsuccessful.' Our analysis involved two stages: first, we thematically analysed the discussions, identifying key parent and professional themes. In stage two, we used an interpretive analysis approach to translate the themes and quotes into measurable outcomes. We compared these outcomes with outcomes measured in vaccination communication trials (previously identified and mapped). RESULTS: We held three focus groups with parents (n = 12) and four with professionals (n = 19). In stage one, we identified six parent themes (primarily related to decision-making) and five professional themes (primarily related to intervention planning, delivery and evaluation). In stage two, we translated 47 outcomes from parents and 73 from professionals (91 total, de-duplicated). All stakeholders discussed attitudes or beliefs and decision-making outcomes most frequently. Most (66%) of the focus group-generated outcomes were not measured in vaccination communication trials. CONCLUSION: Consulting with stakeholders through focus groups allowed us to explore how parents and professionals experienced vaccination communication, identify those aspects of the experience that were important to them, and translate these into outcomes that can be prioritised into a Core Outcome Set and measured in intervention evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6070264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60702642018-08-09 Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication Kaufman, Jessica Ryan, Rebecca Hill, Sophie PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Communication interventions are widely used to promote childhood vaccination and sustain vaccine acceptance, but communication’s role in changing people’s beliefs and behaviours is not well understood. To determine why these interventions work or where they fail, evaluations must measure a range of outcomes in addition to vaccination uptake. As part of a larger project to develop a preliminary Core Outcome Set for vaccination communication, we conducted a qualitative focus group study exploring how parents and health professionals perceive and experience communication encounters and what outcomes are relevant to them. METHODS: Focus group participants included parents and health professionals involved in vaccination communication (healthcare providers, researchers and policymakers). Participants discussed their experiences with communication for childhood vaccination, and what made the communication ‘successful’ or 'unsuccessful.' Our analysis involved two stages: first, we thematically analysed the discussions, identifying key parent and professional themes. In stage two, we used an interpretive analysis approach to translate the themes and quotes into measurable outcomes. We compared these outcomes with outcomes measured in vaccination communication trials (previously identified and mapped). RESULTS: We held three focus groups with parents (n = 12) and four with professionals (n = 19). In stage one, we identified six parent themes (primarily related to decision-making) and five professional themes (primarily related to intervention planning, delivery and evaluation). In stage two, we translated 47 outcomes from parents and 73 from professionals (91 total, de-duplicated). All stakeholders discussed attitudes or beliefs and decision-making outcomes most frequently. Most (66%) of the focus group-generated outcomes were not measured in vaccination communication trials. CONCLUSION: Consulting with stakeholders through focus groups allowed us to explore how parents and professionals experienced vaccination communication, identify those aspects of the experience that were important to them, and translate these into outcomes that can be prioritised into a Core Outcome Set and measured in intervention evaluations. Public Library of Science 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6070264/ /pubmed/30067802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201145 Text en © 2018 Kaufman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaufman, Jessica
Ryan, Rebecca
Hill, Sophie
Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication
title Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication
title_full Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication
title_fullStr Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication
title_short Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication
title_sort qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30067802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201145
work_keys_str_mv AT kaufmanjessica qualitativefocusgroupswithstakeholdersidentifynewpotentialoutcomesrelatedtovaccinationcommunication
AT ryanrebecca qualitativefocusgroupswithstakeholdersidentifynewpotentialoutcomesrelatedtovaccinationcommunication
AT hillsophie qualitativefocusgroupswithstakeholdersidentifynewpotentialoutcomesrelatedtovaccinationcommunication