Cargando…

Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Mucosal exposure devices on the colonoscope tip have improved detection. We evaluated detection and procedure times in colonoscopies performed with EndoRings. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  We had 14 endoscopists in a university practice trial EndoRings. We compared detection and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thygesen, John C., Ponugoti, Prasanna, Tippins, William W., Garcia, Jonathan R., Sullivan, Andrew W., Broadley, Heather M., Rex, Douglas K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0614-2052
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Mucosal exposure devices on the colonoscope tip have improved detection. We evaluated detection and procedure times in colonoscopies performed with EndoRings. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  We had 14 endoscopists in a university practice trial EndoRings. We compared detection and procedure times to age- and indication-matched procedures by the same endoscopists. RESULTS:  There were 137 procedures with EndoRings. The adenoma detection rate was 44 % with EndoRings vs. 39 % without ( P  = 0.39). Mean adenomas per colonoscopy (standard deviation) was 1.2 (2.3) with EndoRings vs. 0.9 (1.6) without ( P  = 0.055). Mean insertion time with EndoRings was 6.2 (3.2) minutes vs. 6.6 (6.7) minutes without ( P  = 0.81). Mean withdrawal time with EndoRings in all patients with or without polypectomy was 12.2 (5.3) minutes and 16.1 (10.3) minutes without ( P  = 0.0005). CONCLUSION:  EndoRings may allow faster withdrawal during colonoscopy without any reduction in detection. Prospective trials with mucosal exposure devices targeting procedure times as primary endpoints are warranted.