Cargando…

Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Mucosal exposure devices on the colonoscope tip have improved detection. We evaluated detection and procedure times in colonoscopies performed with EndoRings. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  We had 14 endoscopists in a university practice trial EndoRings. We compared detection and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thygesen, John C., Ponugoti, Prasanna, Tippins, William W., Garcia, Jonathan R., Sullivan, Andrew W., Broadley, Heather M., Rex, Douglas K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0614-2052
_version_ 1783343662726381568
author Thygesen, John C.
Ponugoti, Prasanna
Tippins, William W.
Garcia, Jonathan R.
Sullivan, Andrew W.
Broadley, Heather M.
Rex, Douglas K.
author_facet Thygesen, John C.
Ponugoti, Prasanna
Tippins, William W.
Garcia, Jonathan R.
Sullivan, Andrew W.
Broadley, Heather M.
Rex, Douglas K.
author_sort Thygesen, John C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Mucosal exposure devices on the colonoscope tip have improved detection. We evaluated detection and procedure times in colonoscopies performed with EndoRings. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  We had 14 endoscopists in a university practice trial EndoRings. We compared detection and procedure times to age- and indication-matched procedures by the same endoscopists. RESULTS:  There were 137 procedures with EndoRings. The adenoma detection rate was 44 % with EndoRings vs. 39 % without ( P  = 0.39). Mean adenomas per colonoscopy (standard deviation) was 1.2 (2.3) with EndoRings vs. 0.9 (1.6) without ( P  = 0.055). Mean insertion time with EndoRings was 6.2 (3.2) minutes vs. 6.6 (6.7) minutes without ( P  = 0.81). Mean withdrawal time with EndoRings in all patients with or without polypectomy was 12.2 (5.3) minutes and 16.1 (10.3) minutes without ( P  = 0.0005). CONCLUSION:  EndoRings may allow faster withdrawal during colonoscopy without any reduction in detection. Prospective trials with mucosal exposure devices targeting procedure times as primary endpoints are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6070371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60703712018-08-06 Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings Thygesen, John C. Ponugoti, Prasanna Tippins, William W. Garcia, Jonathan R. Sullivan, Andrew W. Broadley, Heather M. Rex, Douglas K. Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Mucosal exposure devices on the colonoscope tip have improved detection. We evaluated detection and procedure times in colonoscopies performed with EndoRings. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  We had 14 endoscopists in a university practice trial EndoRings. We compared detection and procedure times to age- and indication-matched procedures by the same endoscopists. RESULTS:  There were 137 procedures with EndoRings. The adenoma detection rate was 44 % with EndoRings vs. 39 % without ( P  = 0.39). Mean adenomas per colonoscopy (standard deviation) was 1.2 (2.3) with EndoRings vs. 0.9 (1.6) without ( P  = 0.055). Mean insertion time with EndoRings was 6.2 (3.2) minutes vs. 6.6 (6.7) minutes without ( P  = 0.81). Mean withdrawal time with EndoRings in all patients with or without polypectomy was 12.2 (5.3) minutes and 16.1 (10.3) minutes without ( P  = 0.0005). CONCLUSION:  EndoRings may allow faster withdrawal during colonoscopy without any reduction in detection. Prospective trials with mucosal exposure devices targeting procedure times as primary endpoints are warranted. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-08 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6070371/ /pubmed/30083584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0614-2052 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Thygesen, John C.
Ponugoti, Prasanna
Tippins, William W.
Garcia, Jonathan R.
Sullivan, Andrew W.
Broadley, Heather M.
Rex, Douglas K.
Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings
title Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings
title_full Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings
title_fullStr Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings
title_full_unstemmed Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings
title_short Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings
title_sort faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using endorings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0614-2052
work_keys_str_mv AT thygesenjohnc fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings
AT ponugotiprasanna fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings
AT tippinswilliamw fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings
AT garciajonathanr fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings
AT sullivanandreww fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings
AT broadleyheatherm fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings
AT rexdouglask fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings