Cargando…
Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Mucosal exposure devices on the colonoscope tip have improved detection. We evaluated detection and procedure times in colonoscopies performed with EndoRings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We had 14 endoscopists in a university practice trial EndoRings. We compared detection and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0614-2052 |
_version_ | 1783343662726381568 |
---|---|
author | Thygesen, John C. Ponugoti, Prasanna Tippins, William W. Garcia, Jonathan R. Sullivan, Andrew W. Broadley, Heather M. Rex, Douglas K. |
author_facet | Thygesen, John C. Ponugoti, Prasanna Tippins, William W. Garcia, Jonathan R. Sullivan, Andrew W. Broadley, Heather M. Rex, Douglas K. |
author_sort | Thygesen, John C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Mucosal exposure devices on the colonoscope tip have improved detection. We evaluated detection and procedure times in colonoscopies performed with EndoRings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We had 14 endoscopists in a university practice trial EndoRings. We compared detection and procedure times to age- and indication-matched procedures by the same endoscopists. RESULTS: There were 137 procedures with EndoRings. The adenoma detection rate was 44 % with EndoRings vs. 39 % without ( P = 0.39). Mean adenomas per colonoscopy (standard deviation) was 1.2 (2.3) with EndoRings vs. 0.9 (1.6) without ( P = 0.055). Mean insertion time with EndoRings was 6.2 (3.2) minutes vs. 6.6 (6.7) minutes without ( P = 0.81). Mean withdrawal time with EndoRings in all patients with or without polypectomy was 12.2 (5.3) minutes and 16.1 (10.3) minutes without ( P = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: EndoRings may allow faster withdrawal during colonoscopy without any reduction in detection. Prospective trials with mucosal exposure devices targeting procedure times as primary endpoints are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6070371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60703712018-08-06 Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings Thygesen, John C. Ponugoti, Prasanna Tippins, William W. Garcia, Jonathan R. Sullivan, Andrew W. Broadley, Heather M. Rex, Douglas K. Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Mucosal exposure devices on the colonoscope tip have improved detection. We evaluated detection and procedure times in colonoscopies performed with EndoRings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We had 14 endoscopists in a university practice trial EndoRings. We compared detection and procedure times to age- and indication-matched procedures by the same endoscopists. RESULTS: There were 137 procedures with EndoRings. The adenoma detection rate was 44 % with EndoRings vs. 39 % without ( P = 0.39). Mean adenomas per colonoscopy (standard deviation) was 1.2 (2.3) with EndoRings vs. 0.9 (1.6) without ( P = 0.055). Mean insertion time with EndoRings was 6.2 (3.2) minutes vs. 6.6 (6.7) minutes without ( P = 0.81). Mean withdrawal time with EndoRings in all patients with or without polypectomy was 12.2 (5.3) minutes and 16.1 (10.3) minutes without ( P = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: EndoRings may allow faster withdrawal during colonoscopy without any reduction in detection. Prospective trials with mucosal exposure devices targeting procedure times as primary endpoints are warranted. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-08 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6070371/ /pubmed/30083584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0614-2052 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Thygesen, John C. Ponugoti, Prasanna Tippins, William W. Garcia, Jonathan R. Sullivan, Andrew W. Broadley, Heather M. Rex, Douglas K. Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings |
title | Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings |
title_full | Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings |
title_fullStr | Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings |
title_full_unstemmed | Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings |
title_short | Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings |
title_sort | faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using endorings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0614-2052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thygesenjohnc fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings AT ponugotiprasanna fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings AT tippinswilliamw fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings AT garciajonathanr fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings AT sullivanandreww fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings AT broadleyheatherm fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings AT rexdouglask fastercolonoscopewithdrawaltimewithoutimpaireddetectionusingendorings |