Cargando…
Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion of glass-ceramic overlays to tooth structure, under the effect of shear forces, using different bonding systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy lower third molars were selected and randomly allocated into three groups (n = 10). Group 1: o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111909 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_165_17 |
_version_ | 1783343747391553536 |
---|---|
author | Reboul, Thomas Hoang Thaï, HA Cetik, Sibel Atash, Ramin |
author_facet | Reboul, Thomas Hoang Thaï, HA Cetik, Sibel Atash, Ramin |
author_sort | Reboul, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion of glass-ceramic overlays to tooth structure, under the effect of shear forces, using different bonding systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy lower third molars were selected and randomly allocated into three groups (n = 10). Group 1: overlays bonded to tooth structure using Panavia V5 with immediate dentin sealing (IDS); Group 2: overlays bonded using Panavia V5 without IDS; and Group 3: overlays bonded using heated composite combined with a bonding agent with IDS. All the restorations were made of glass-ceramic (Suprinity, Vita). The restored teeth were then stored in distilled water for 7 days and at room temperature. Shear forces were applied using a universal testing machine. Load and displacement were recorded at intervals of 0.1 s. A statistical analysis was used to compare the groups. RESULTS: The mean resistance to fractures ± standard deviation obtained for the Groups 1, 2, and 3 was, respectively, 15.7440 ± 2.13, 12.0750 ± 1.41, and 8.33364 ± 2.85 MPa. The analysis of variance was highly significant (P < 0.001) allowing us to reject the null hypothesis of equality between the three groups. Comparisons between pairs also provided significant results. CONCLUSION: Bonding using Panavia V5 with IDS showed a better resistance to shear forces when compared to other bonding techniques. The application of IDS increased the adhesion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6070845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60708452019-07-01 Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study Reboul, Thomas Hoang Thaï, HA Cetik, Sibel Atash, Ramin J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion of glass-ceramic overlays to tooth structure, under the effect of shear forces, using different bonding systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy lower third molars were selected and randomly allocated into three groups (n = 10). Group 1: overlays bonded to tooth structure using Panavia V5 with immediate dentin sealing (IDS); Group 2: overlays bonded using Panavia V5 without IDS; and Group 3: overlays bonded using heated composite combined with a bonding agent with IDS. All the restorations were made of glass-ceramic (Suprinity, Vita). The restored teeth were then stored in distilled water for 7 days and at room temperature. Shear forces were applied using a universal testing machine. Load and displacement were recorded at intervals of 0.1 s. A statistical analysis was used to compare the groups. RESULTS: The mean resistance to fractures ± standard deviation obtained for the Groups 1, 2, and 3 was, respectively, 15.7440 ± 2.13, 12.0750 ± 1.41, and 8.33364 ± 2.85 MPa. The analysis of variance was highly significant (P < 0.001) allowing us to reject the null hypothesis of equality between the three groups. Comparisons between pairs also provided significant results. CONCLUSION: Bonding using Panavia V5 with IDS showed a better resistance to shear forces when compared to other bonding techniques. The application of IDS increased the adhesion. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6070845/ /pubmed/30111909 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_165_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Reboul, Thomas Hoang Thaï, HA Cetik, Sibel Atash, Ramin Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study |
title | Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111909 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_165_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reboulthomas comparisonbetweenshearforcesappliedontheoverlaydentaltissueinterfaceusingdifferentbondingtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT hoangthaiha comparisonbetweenshearforcesappliedontheoverlaydentaltissueinterfaceusingdifferentbondingtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT cetiksibel comparisonbetweenshearforcesappliedontheoverlaydentaltissueinterfaceusingdifferentbondingtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT atashramin comparisonbetweenshearforcesappliedontheoverlaydentaltissueinterfaceusingdifferentbondingtechniquesaninvitrostudy |