Cargando…

Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion of glass-ceramic overlays to tooth structure, under the effect of shear forces, using different bonding systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy lower third molars were selected and randomly allocated into three groups (n = 10). Group 1: o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reboul, Thomas, Hoang Thaï, HA, Cetik, Sibel, Atash, Ramin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111909
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_165_17
_version_ 1783343747391553536
author Reboul, Thomas
Hoang Thaï, HA
Cetik, Sibel
Atash, Ramin
author_facet Reboul, Thomas
Hoang Thaï, HA
Cetik, Sibel
Atash, Ramin
author_sort Reboul, Thomas
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion of glass-ceramic overlays to tooth structure, under the effect of shear forces, using different bonding systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy lower third molars were selected and randomly allocated into three groups (n = 10). Group 1: overlays bonded to tooth structure using Panavia V5 with immediate dentin sealing (IDS); Group 2: overlays bonded using Panavia V5 without IDS; and Group 3: overlays bonded using heated composite combined with a bonding agent with IDS. All the restorations were made of glass-ceramic (Suprinity, Vita). The restored teeth were then stored in distilled water for 7 days and at room temperature. Shear forces were applied using a universal testing machine. Load and displacement were recorded at intervals of 0.1 s. A statistical analysis was used to compare the groups. RESULTS: The mean resistance to fractures ± standard deviation obtained for the Groups 1, 2, and 3 was, respectively, 15.7440 ± 2.13, 12.0750 ± 1.41, and 8.33364 ± 2.85 MPa. The analysis of variance was highly significant (P < 0.001) allowing us to reject the null hypothesis of equality between the three groups. Comparisons between pairs also provided significant results. CONCLUSION: Bonding using Panavia V5 with IDS showed a better resistance to shear forces when compared to other bonding techniques. The application of IDS increased the adhesion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6070845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60708452019-07-01 Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study Reboul, Thomas Hoang Thaï, HA Cetik, Sibel Atash, Ramin J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the adhesion of glass-ceramic overlays to tooth structure, under the effect of shear forces, using different bonding systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy lower third molars were selected and randomly allocated into three groups (n = 10). Group 1: overlays bonded to tooth structure using Panavia V5 with immediate dentin sealing (IDS); Group 2: overlays bonded using Panavia V5 without IDS; and Group 3: overlays bonded using heated composite combined with a bonding agent with IDS. All the restorations were made of glass-ceramic (Suprinity, Vita). The restored teeth were then stored in distilled water for 7 days and at room temperature. Shear forces were applied using a universal testing machine. Load and displacement were recorded at intervals of 0.1 s. A statistical analysis was used to compare the groups. RESULTS: The mean resistance to fractures ± standard deviation obtained for the Groups 1, 2, and 3 was, respectively, 15.7440 ± 2.13, 12.0750 ± 1.41, and 8.33364 ± 2.85 MPa. The analysis of variance was highly significant (P < 0.001) allowing us to reject the null hypothesis of equality between the three groups. Comparisons between pairs also provided significant results. CONCLUSION: Bonding using Panavia V5 with IDS showed a better resistance to shear forces when compared to other bonding techniques. The application of IDS increased the adhesion. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6070845/ /pubmed/30111909 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_165_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Reboul, Thomas
Hoang Thaï, HA
Cetik, Sibel
Atash, Ramin
Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study
title Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study
title_full Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study
title_short Comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: An in vitro study
title_sort comparison between shear forces applied on the overlay-dental tissue interface using different bonding techniques: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111909
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_165_17
work_keys_str_mv AT reboulthomas comparisonbetweenshearforcesappliedontheoverlaydentaltissueinterfaceusingdifferentbondingtechniquesaninvitrostudy
AT hoangthaiha comparisonbetweenshearforcesappliedontheoverlaydentaltissueinterfaceusingdifferentbondingtechniquesaninvitrostudy
AT cetiksibel comparisonbetweenshearforcesappliedontheoverlaydentaltissueinterfaceusingdifferentbondingtechniquesaninvitrostudy
AT atashramin comparisonbetweenshearforcesappliedontheoverlaydentaltissueinterfaceusingdifferentbondingtechniquesaninvitrostudy