Cargando…

Wettability of three denture base materials to human saliva, saliva substitute, and distilled water: A comparative in vitro study

AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the wettability of saliva, a saliva substitute, and distilled water to three denture base materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty specimens of each denture base material: Heat cure polymethylmethacrylate (DPI heat cure), high-impact polymethylmethacryla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ramanna, Pavithra K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111914
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_301_17
_version_ 1783343748359389184
author Ramanna, Pavithra K.
author_facet Ramanna, Pavithra K.
author_sort Ramanna, Pavithra K.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the wettability of saliva, a saliva substitute, and distilled water to three denture base materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty specimens of each denture base material: Heat cure polymethylmethacrylate (DPI heat cure), high-impact polymethylmethacrylate (Trevalon HI), and nylon (Valplast) were fabricated. The specimens of each denture base material were divided into three groups of ten specimens. The advancing and receding contact angles of three media: a commercially available carboxymethylcellulose-based saliva substitute (WET MOUTH), human whole saliva, and distilled water, with each denture base material were determined using a goniometer. The contact angle hysteresis was calculated as the difference between the advancing and receding contact angles. The data were statistically analyzed using univariate analysis of variance and Duncan post hoc test. RESULTS: Low-advancing and receding contact angles were demonstrated on high-impact heat-polymerized polymethylmethacrylate denture base material. Highest hysteresis values were calculated for nylon denture base material. CONCLUSION: Best wettability was demonstrated on high-impact heat-polymerized polymethylmethacrylate denture base material. Based on the high hysteresis values calculated with nylon denture base material, it would possibly provide better denture retention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6070849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60708492019-07-01 Wettability of three denture base materials to human saliva, saliva substitute, and distilled water: A comparative in vitro study Ramanna, Pavithra K. J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the wettability of saliva, a saliva substitute, and distilled water to three denture base materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty specimens of each denture base material: Heat cure polymethylmethacrylate (DPI heat cure), high-impact polymethylmethacrylate (Trevalon HI), and nylon (Valplast) were fabricated. The specimens of each denture base material were divided into three groups of ten specimens. The advancing and receding contact angles of three media: a commercially available carboxymethylcellulose-based saliva substitute (WET MOUTH), human whole saliva, and distilled water, with each denture base material were determined using a goniometer. The contact angle hysteresis was calculated as the difference between the advancing and receding contact angles. The data were statistically analyzed using univariate analysis of variance and Duncan post hoc test. RESULTS: Low-advancing and receding contact angles were demonstrated on high-impact heat-polymerized polymethylmethacrylate denture base material. Highest hysteresis values were calculated for nylon denture base material. CONCLUSION: Best wettability was demonstrated on high-impact heat-polymerized polymethylmethacrylate denture base material. Based on the high hysteresis values calculated with nylon denture base material, it would possibly provide better denture retention. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6070849/ /pubmed/30111914 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_301_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ramanna, Pavithra K.
Wettability of three denture base materials to human saliva, saliva substitute, and distilled water: A comparative in vitro study
title Wettability of three denture base materials to human saliva, saliva substitute, and distilled water: A comparative in vitro study
title_full Wettability of three denture base materials to human saliva, saliva substitute, and distilled water: A comparative in vitro study
title_fullStr Wettability of three denture base materials to human saliva, saliva substitute, and distilled water: A comparative in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Wettability of three denture base materials to human saliva, saliva substitute, and distilled water: A comparative in vitro study
title_short Wettability of three denture base materials to human saliva, saliva substitute, and distilled water: A comparative in vitro study
title_sort wettability of three denture base materials to human saliva, saliva substitute, and distilled water: a comparative in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111914
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_301_17
work_keys_str_mv AT ramannapavithrak wettabilityofthreedenturebasematerialstohumansalivasalivasubstituteanddistilledwateracomparativeinvitrostudy