Cargando…

Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis are one of the common biological complications affecting implant success. The present study aimed to evaluate various clinical parameters during implant maintenance phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included patients undergoing i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kandasamy, Baburajan, Samson, Emmanuel P., Yaqoob, Ashfaq, Pandey, Pragya, Deenadayalan, S., Das, Indrani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_64_18
_version_ 1783343858260639744
author Kandasamy, Baburajan
Samson, Emmanuel P.
Yaqoob, Ashfaq
Pandey, Pragya
Deenadayalan, S.
Das, Indrani
author_facet Kandasamy, Baburajan
Samson, Emmanuel P.
Yaqoob, Ashfaq
Pandey, Pragya
Deenadayalan, S.
Das, Indrani
author_sort Kandasamy, Baburajan
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis are one of the common biological complications affecting implant success. The present study aimed to evaluate various clinical parameters during implant maintenance phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included patients undergoing implant maintenance phase for 1-year follow-up. The study consists of a total of forty individuals with age ranging from 35 to 65 years. They were further categorized into two subgroups on the basis of their history, i.e., Group 1: patients with no history of periodontitis before implant placement and Group 2: patients with a history of periodontitis before implant placement. Among the selected patients, a total of 98 implants were studied. All were individually evaluated for clinical parameters such as gingival index, pocket probing depth (PPD), and bleeding on probing (BOP). All the data obtained were tabulated and analyzed using statistical software SPSS version 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Quantitative analysis was done using t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 was 58.6 and 62.8 years, respectively, with not much gender difference. The mean plaque index for Group 1 was 0.17 ± 0.20, while for Group 2, it was 0.24 ± 0.14. The mean PPD and mean BOP for Group 1 came to be 2.60 ± 0.42 and 0.42 ± 0.15, respectively, whereas for Group 2, it was 4.08 ± 0.30 and 0.39 ± 0.48, respectively. Only PPD was found to be statistically significantly different between both the groups. Group 1 showed 2.0% peri-implantitis, whereas Group 2 showed 28% peri-implantitis. CONCLUSION: Due to increased prevalence of peri-implantitis cases with the increase in usage of implants, it becomes imperative to look up to the etiological factors and contributing factors so that the incidence of these can be minimized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6071357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60713572018-08-17 Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis Kandasamy, Baburajan Samson, Emmanuel P. Yaqoob, Ashfaq Pandey, Pragya Deenadayalan, S. Das, Indrani J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis are one of the common biological complications affecting implant success. The present study aimed to evaluate various clinical parameters during implant maintenance phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included patients undergoing implant maintenance phase for 1-year follow-up. The study consists of a total of forty individuals with age ranging from 35 to 65 years. They were further categorized into two subgroups on the basis of their history, i.e., Group 1: patients with no history of periodontitis before implant placement and Group 2: patients with a history of periodontitis before implant placement. Among the selected patients, a total of 98 implants were studied. All were individually evaluated for clinical parameters such as gingival index, pocket probing depth (PPD), and bleeding on probing (BOP). All the data obtained were tabulated and analyzed using statistical software SPSS version 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Quantitative analysis was done using t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 was 58.6 and 62.8 years, respectively, with not much gender difference. The mean plaque index for Group 1 was 0.17 ± 0.20, while for Group 2, it was 0.24 ± 0.14. The mean PPD and mean BOP for Group 1 came to be 2.60 ± 0.42 and 0.42 ± 0.15, respectively, whereas for Group 2, it was 4.08 ± 0.30 and 0.39 ± 0.48, respectively. Only PPD was found to be statistically significantly different between both the groups. Group 1 showed 2.0% peri-implantitis, whereas Group 2 showed 28% peri-implantitis. CONCLUSION: Due to increased prevalence of peri-implantitis cases with the increase in usage of implants, it becomes imperative to look up to the etiological factors and contributing factors so that the incidence of these can be minimized. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 2018-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6071357/ /pubmed/30123771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_64_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kandasamy, Baburajan
Samson, Emmanuel P.
Yaqoob, Ashfaq
Pandey, Pragya
Deenadayalan, S.
Das, Indrani
Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis
title Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis
title_full Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis
title_short Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis
title_sort evaluation of clinical parameters in implant maintenance phase for prevention of peri-implantitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_64_18
work_keys_str_mv AT kandasamybaburajan evaluationofclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancephaseforpreventionofperiimplantitis
AT samsonemmanuelp evaluationofclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancephaseforpreventionofperiimplantitis
AT yaqoobashfaq evaluationofclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancephaseforpreventionofperiimplantitis
AT pandeypragya evaluationofclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancephaseforpreventionofperiimplantitis
AT deenadayalans evaluationofclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancephaseforpreventionofperiimplantitis
AT dasindrani evaluationofclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancephaseforpreventionofperiimplantitis