Cargando…

Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function

BACKGROUND: Pressure overload-induced myocardial hypertrophy is a key step leading to heart failure. Previous cellular and animal studies demonstrated that deteriorated excitation–contraction coupling occurs as early as the compensated stage of hypertrophy before the global decrease in left ventricu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Juan, Zhu, Min, Yu, Hai-Yi, Wang, Shi-Qiang, Feng, Xin-Heng, Xu, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30058581
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.237395
_version_ 1783343874817654784
author Gao, Juan
Zhu, Min
Yu, Hai-Yi
Wang, Shi-Qiang
Feng, Xin-Heng
Xu, Ming
author_facet Gao, Juan
Zhu, Min
Yu, Hai-Yi
Wang, Shi-Qiang
Feng, Xin-Heng
Xu, Ming
author_sort Gao, Juan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressure overload-induced myocardial hypertrophy is a key step leading to heart failure. Previous cellular and animal studies demonstrated that deteriorated excitation–contraction coupling occurs as early as the compensated stage of hypertrophy before the global decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study was to evaluate the cardiac electromechanical coupling time in evaluating cardiac systolic function in the early stage of heart failure. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with Stage B heart failure (SBHF) and 31 healthy controls (CONs) were enrolled in this study. M-mode echocardiography was performed to measure LVEF. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) combined with electrocardiography (ECG) was used to measure cardiac electromechanical coupling time. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in LVEF between SBHF patients and CONs (64.23 ± 8.91% vs. 64.52 ± 5.90%; P = 0.886). However, all four electromechanical coupling time courses (Qsb: onset of Q wave on ECG to beginning of S wave on TDI, Qst: onset of Q wave on ECG to top of S wave on TDI, Rsb: top of R wave on ECG to beginning of S wave on TDI, and Rst: top of R wave on ECG to top of S wave on TDI) of SBHF patients were significantly longer than those of CONs (Qsb: 119.19 ± 35.68 ms vs. 80.30 ± 14.81 ms, P < 0.001; Qst: 165.42 ± 60.93 ms vs. 129.04 ± 16.97 ms, P = 0.006; Rsb: 82.43 ± 33.66 ms vs. 48.30 ± 15.18 ms, P < 0.001; and Rst: 122.37 ± 36.66 ms vs. 93.25 ± 16.72 ms, P = 0.001), and the Qsb, Rsb, and Rst time showed a significantly higher sensitivity than LVEF (Rst: P =0.032; Rsb: P = 0.003; and Qsb: P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The cardiac electromechanical coupling time is more sensitive than LVEF in evaluating cardiac systolic function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6071456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60714562018-08-18 Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function Gao, Juan Zhu, Min Yu, Hai-Yi Wang, Shi-Qiang Feng, Xin-Heng Xu, Ming Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Pressure overload-induced myocardial hypertrophy is a key step leading to heart failure. Previous cellular and animal studies demonstrated that deteriorated excitation–contraction coupling occurs as early as the compensated stage of hypertrophy before the global decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study was to evaluate the cardiac electromechanical coupling time in evaluating cardiac systolic function in the early stage of heart failure. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with Stage B heart failure (SBHF) and 31 healthy controls (CONs) were enrolled in this study. M-mode echocardiography was performed to measure LVEF. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) combined with electrocardiography (ECG) was used to measure cardiac electromechanical coupling time. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in LVEF between SBHF patients and CONs (64.23 ± 8.91% vs. 64.52 ± 5.90%; P = 0.886). However, all four electromechanical coupling time courses (Qsb: onset of Q wave on ECG to beginning of S wave on TDI, Qst: onset of Q wave on ECG to top of S wave on TDI, Rsb: top of R wave on ECG to beginning of S wave on TDI, and Rst: top of R wave on ECG to top of S wave on TDI) of SBHF patients were significantly longer than those of CONs (Qsb: 119.19 ± 35.68 ms vs. 80.30 ± 14.81 ms, P < 0.001; Qst: 165.42 ± 60.93 ms vs. 129.04 ± 16.97 ms, P = 0.006; Rsb: 82.43 ± 33.66 ms vs. 48.30 ± 15.18 ms, P < 0.001; and Rst: 122.37 ± 36.66 ms vs. 93.25 ± 16.72 ms, P = 0.001), and the Qsb, Rsb, and Rst time showed a significantly higher sensitivity than LVEF (Rst: P =0.032; Rsb: P = 0.003; and Qsb: P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The cardiac electromechanical coupling time is more sensitive than LVEF in evaluating cardiac systolic function. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6071456/ /pubmed/30058581 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.237395 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gao, Juan
Zhu, Min
Yu, Hai-Yi
Wang, Shi-Qiang
Feng, Xin-Heng
Xu, Ming
Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function
title Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function
title_full Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function
title_fullStr Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function
title_full_unstemmed Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function
title_short Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function
title_sort excitation-contraction coupling time is more sensitive in evaluating cardiac systolic function
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30058581
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.237395
work_keys_str_mv AT gaojuan excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction
AT zhumin excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction
AT yuhaiyi excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction
AT wangshiqiang excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction
AT fengxinheng excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction
AT xuming excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction