Cargando…
Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function
BACKGROUND: Pressure overload-induced myocardial hypertrophy is a key step leading to heart failure. Previous cellular and animal studies demonstrated that deteriorated excitation–contraction coupling occurs as early as the compensated stage of hypertrophy before the global decrease in left ventricu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30058581 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.237395 |
_version_ | 1783343874817654784 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Juan Zhu, Min Yu, Hai-Yi Wang, Shi-Qiang Feng, Xin-Heng Xu, Ming |
author_facet | Gao, Juan Zhu, Min Yu, Hai-Yi Wang, Shi-Qiang Feng, Xin-Heng Xu, Ming |
author_sort | Gao, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pressure overload-induced myocardial hypertrophy is a key step leading to heart failure. Previous cellular and animal studies demonstrated that deteriorated excitation–contraction coupling occurs as early as the compensated stage of hypertrophy before the global decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study was to evaluate the cardiac electromechanical coupling time in evaluating cardiac systolic function in the early stage of heart failure. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with Stage B heart failure (SBHF) and 31 healthy controls (CONs) were enrolled in this study. M-mode echocardiography was performed to measure LVEF. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) combined with electrocardiography (ECG) was used to measure cardiac electromechanical coupling time. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in LVEF between SBHF patients and CONs (64.23 ± 8.91% vs. 64.52 ± 5.90%; P = 0.886). However, all four electromechanical coupling time courses (Qsb: onset of Q wave on ECG to beginning of S wave on TDI, Qst: onset of Q wave on ECG to top of S wave on TDI, Rsb: top of R wave on ECG to beginning of S wave on TDI, and Rst: top of R wave on ECG to top of S wave on TDI) of SBHF patients were significantly longer than those of CONs (Qsb: 119.19 ± 35.68 ms vs. 80.30 ± 14.81 ms, P < 0.001; Qst: 165.42 ± 60.93 ms vs. 129.04 ± 16.97 ms, P = 0.006; Rsb: 82.43 ± 33.66 ms vs. 48.30 ± 15.18 ms, P < 0.001; and Rst: 122.37 ± 36.66 ms vs. 93.25 ± 16.72 ms, P = 0.001), and the Qsb, Rsb, and Rst time showed a significantly higher sensitivity than LVEF (Rst: P =0.032; Rsb: P = 0.003; and Qsb: P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The cardiac electromechanical coupling time is more sensitive than LVEF in evaluating cardiac systolic function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6071456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60714562018-08-18 Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function Gao, Juan Zhu, Min Yu, Hai-Yi Wang, Shi-Qiang Feng, Xin-Heng Xu, Ming Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Pressure overload-induced myocardial hypertrophy is a key step leading to heart failure. Previous cellular and animal studies demonstrated that deteriorated excitation–contraction coupling occurs as early as the compensated stage of hypertrophy before the global decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study was to evaluate the cardiac electromechanical coupling time in evaluating cardiac systolic function in the early stage of heart failure. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with Stage B heart failure (SBHF) and 31 healthy controls (CONs) were enrolled in this study. M-mode echocardiography was performed to measure LVEF. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) combined with electrocardiography (ECG) was used to measure cardiac electromechanical coupling time. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in LVEF between SBHF patients and CONs (64.23 ± 8.91% vs. 64.52 ± 5.90%; P = 0.886). However, all four electromechanical coupling time courses (Qsb: onset of Q wave on ECG to beginning of S wave on TDI, Qst: onset of Q wave on ECG to top of S wave on TDI, Rsb: top of R wave on ECG to beginning of S wave on TDI, and Rst: top of R wave on ECG to top of S wave on TDI) of SBHF patients were significantly longer than those of CONs (Qsb: 119.19 ± 35.68 ms vs. 80.30 ± 14.81 ms, P < 0.001; Qst: 165.42 ± 60.93 ms vs. 129.04 ± 16.97 ms, P = 0.006; Rsb: 82.43 ± 33.66 ms vs. 48.30 ± 15.18 ms, P < 0.001; and Rst: 122.37 ± 36.66 ms vs. 93.25 ± 16.72 ms, P = 0.001), and the Qsb, Rsb, and Rst time showed a significantly higher sensitivity than LVEF (Rst: P =0.032; Rsb: P = 0.003; and Qsb: P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The cardiac electromechanical coupling time is more sensitive than LVEF in evaluating cardiac systolic function. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6071456/ /pubmed/30058581 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.237395 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gao, Juan Zhu, Min Yu, Hai-Yi Wang, Shi-Qiang Feng, Xin-Heng Xu, Ming Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function |
title | Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function |
title_full | Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function |
title_fullStr | Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function |
title_full_unstemmed | Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function |
title_short | Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function |
title_sort | excitation-contraction coupling time is more sensitive in evaluating cardiac systolic function |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30058581 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.237395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaojuan excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction AT zhumin excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction AT yuhaiyi excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction AT wangshiqiang excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction AT fengxinheng excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction AT xuming excitationcontractioncouplingtimeismoresensitiveinevaluatingcardiacsystolicfunction |