Cargando…
A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method
Hall effect metrology is important for a detailed characterization of the electronic properties of new materials for nanoscale electronics. The micro-Hall effect (MHE) method, based on micro four-point probes, enables a fast characterization of ultrathin films with minimal sample preparation. Here,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Beilstein-Institut
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.192 |
_version_ | 1783343916475482112 |
---|---|
author | Witthøft, Maria-Louise Østerberg, Frederik W Bogdanowicz, Janusz Lin, Rong Henrichsen, Henrik H Hansen, Ole Petersen, Dirch H |
author_facet | Witthøft, Maria-Louise Østerberg, Frederik W Bogdanowicz, Janusz Lin, Rong Henrichsen, Henrik H Hansen, Ole Petersen, Dirch H |
author_sort | Witthøft, Maria-Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hall effect metrology is important for a detailed characterization of the electronic properties of new materials for nanoscale electronics. The micro-Hall effect (MHE) method, based on micro four-point probes, enables a fast characterization of ultrathin films with minimal sample preparation. Here, we study in detail how the analysis of raw measurement data affects the accuracy of extracted key sample parameters, i.e., how the standard deviation on sheet resistance, carrier mobility and Hall sheet carrier density is affected by the data analysis used. We compare two methods, based primarily on either the sheet resistance signals or the Hall resistance signals, by theoretically analysing the effects of electrode position errors and electrical noise on the standard deviations. We verify the findings with a set of experimental data measured on an ultrashallow junction silicon sample. We find that in presence of significant electrical noise, lower standard deviation is always obtained when the geometrical analysis is based on the sheet resistance signals. The situation is more complicated when electrode position errors are dominant; in that case, the better method depends on the experimental conditions, i.e., the distance between the insulating boundary and the electrodes. Improvement to the accuracy of Hall Effect measurement results is crucial for nanoscale metrology, since surface scattering often leads to low carrier mobility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6071715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Beilstein-Institut |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60717152018-08-16 A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method Witthøft, Maria-Louise Østerberg, Frederik W Bogdanowicz, Janusz Lin, Rong Henrichsen, Henrik H Hansen, Ole Petersen, Dirch H Beilstein J Nanotechnol Full Research Paper Hall effect metrology is important for a detailed characterization of the electronic properties of new materials for nanoscale electronics. The micro-Hall effect (MHE) method, based on micro four-point probes, enables a fast characterization of ultrathin films with minimal sample preparation. Here, we study in detail how the analysis of raw measurement data affects the accuracy of extracted key sample parameters, i.e., how the standard deviation on sheet resistance, carrier mobility and Hall sheet carrier density is affected by the data analysis used. We compare two methods, based primarily on either the sheet resistance signals or the Hall resistance signals, by theoretically analysing the effects of electrode position errors and electrical noise on the standard deviations. We verify the findings with a set of experimental data measured on an ultrashallow junction silicon sample. We find that in presence of significant electrical noise, lower standard deviation is always obtained when the geometrical analysis is based on the sheet resistance signals. The situation is more complicated when electrode position errors are dominant; in that case, the better method depends on the experimental conditions, i.e., the distance between the insulating boundary and the electrodes. Improvement to the accuracy of Hall Effect measurement results is crucial for nanoscale metrology, since surface scattering often leads to low carrier mobility. Beilstein-Institut 2018-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6071715/ /pubmed/30116693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.192 Text en Copyright © 2018, Witthøft et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano/termsThis is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited. The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano/terms) |
spellingShingle | Full Research Paper Witthøft, Maria-Louise Østerberg, Frederik W Bogdanowicz, Janusz Lin, Rong Henrichsen, Henrik H Hansen, Ole Petersen, Dirch H A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method |
title | A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method |
title_full | A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method |
title_fullStr | A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method |
title_full_unstemmed | A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method |
title_short | A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method |
title_sort | variable probe pitch micro-hall effect method |
topic | Full Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT witthøftmarialouise avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT østerbergfrederikw avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT bogdanowiczjanusz avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT linrong avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT henrichsenhenrikh avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT hansenole avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT petersendirchh avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT witthøftmarialouise variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT østerbergfrederikw variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT bogdanowiczjanusz variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT linrong variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT henrichsenhenrikh variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT hansenole variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod AT petersendirchh variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod |