Cargando…

A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method

Hall effect metrology is important for a detailed characterization of the electronic properties of new materials for nanoscale electronics. The micro-Hall effect (MHE) method, based on micro four-point probes, enables a fast characterization of ultrathin films with minimal sample preparation. Here,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witthøft, Maria-Louise, Østerberg, Frederik W, Bogdanowicz, Janusz, Lin, Rong, Henrichsen, Henrik H, Hansen, Ole, Petersen, Dirch H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Beilstein-Institut 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.192
_version_ 1783343916475482112
author Witthøft, Maria-Louise
Østerberg, Frederik W
Bogdanowicz, Janusz
Lin, Rong
Henrichsen, Henrik H
Hansen, Ole
Petersen, Dirch H
author_facet Witthøft, Maria-Louise
Østerberg, Frederik W
Bogdanowicz, Janusz
Lin, Rong
Henrichsen, Henrik H
Hansen, Ole
Petersen, Dirch H
author_sort Witthøft, Maria-Louise
collection PubMed
description Hall effect metrology is important for a detailed characterization of the electronic properties of new materials for nanoscale electronics. The micro-Hall effect (MHE) method, based on micro four-point probes, enables a fast characterization of ultrathin films with minimal sample preparation. Here, we study in detail how the analysis of raw measurement data affects the accuracy of extracted key sample parameters, i.e., how the standard deviation on sheet resistance, carrier mobility and Hall sheet carrier density is affected by the data analysis used. We compare two methods, based primarily on either the sheet resistance signals or the Hall resistance signals, by theoretically analysing the effects of electrode position errors and electrical noise on the standard deviations. We verify the findings with a set of experimental data measured on an ultrashallow junction silicon sample. We find that in presence of significant electrical noise, lower standard deviation is always obtained when the geometrical analysis is based on the sheet resistance signals. The situation is more complicated when electrode position errors are dominant; in that case, the better method depends on the experimental conditions, i.e., the distance between the insulating boundary and the electrodes. Improvement to the accuracy of Hall Effect measurement results is crucial for nanoscale metrology, since surface scattering often leads to low carrier mobility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6071715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Beilstein-Institut
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60717152018-08-16 A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method Witthøft, Maria-Louise Østerberg, Frederik W Bogdanowicz, Janusz Lin, Rong Henrichsen, Henrik H Hansen, Ole Petersen, Dirch H Beilstein J Nanotechnol Full Research Paper Hall effect metrology is important for a detailed characterization of the electronic properties of new materials for nanoscale electronics. The micro-Hall effect (MHE) method, based on micro four-point probes, enables a fast characterization of ultrathin films with minimal sample preparation. Here, we study in detail how the analysis of raw measurement data affects the accuracy of extracted key sample parameters, i.e., how the standard deviation on sheet resistance, carrier mobility and Hall sheet carrier density is affected by the data analysis used. We compare two methods, based primarily on either the sheet resistance signals or the Hall resistance signals, by theoretically analysing the effects of electrode position errors and electrical noise on the standard deviations. We verify the findings with a set of experimental data measured on an ultrashallow junction silicon sample. We find that in presence of significant electrical noise, lower standard deviation is always obtained when the geometrical analysis is based on the sheet resistance signals. The situation is more complicated when electrode position errors are dominant; in that case, the better method depends on the experimental conditions, i.e., the distance between the insulating boundary and the electrodes. Improvement to the accuracy of Hall Effect measurement results is crucial for nanoscale metrology, since surface scattering often leads to low carrier mobility. Beilstein-Institut 2018-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6071715/ /pubmed/30116693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.192 Text en Copyright © 2018, Witthøft et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano/termsThis is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited. The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano/terms)
spellingShingle Full Research Paper
Witthøft, Maria-Louise
Østerberg, Frederik W
Bogdanowicz, Janusz
Lin, Rong
Henrichsen, Henrik H
Hansen, Ole
Petersen, Dirch H
A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method
title A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method
title_full A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method
title_fullStr A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method
title_full_unstemmed A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method
title_short A variable probe pitch micro-Hall effect method
title_sort variable probe pitch micro-hall effect method
topic Full Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.192
work_keys_str_mv AT witthøftmarialouise avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT østerbergfrederikw avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT bogdanowiczjanusz avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT linrong avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT henrichsenhenrikh avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT hansenole avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT petersendirchh avariableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT witthøftmarialouise variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT østerbergfrederikw variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT bogdanowiczjanusz variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT linrong variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT henrichsenhenrikh variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT hansenole variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod
AT petersendirchh variableprobepitchmicrohalleffectmethod