Cargando…

Bias Amplification in Epidemiologic Analysis of Exposure to Mixtures

BACKGROUND: The analysis of health effects of exposure to mixtures is a critically important issue in human epidemiology, and increasing effort is being devoted to developing methods for this problem. A key feature of environmental mixtures is that some components can be highly correlated, raising t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weisskopf, Marc G., Seals, Ryan M., Webster, Thomas F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Environmental Health Perspectives 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29624292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP2450
_version_ 1783343926847995904
author Weisskopf, Marc G.
Seals, Ryan M.
Webster, Thomas F.
author_facet Weisskopf, Marc G.
Seals, Ryan M.
Webster, Thomas F.
author_sort Weisskopf, Marc G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The analysis of health effects of exposure to mixtures is a critically important issue in human epidemiology, and increasing effort is being devoted to developing methods for this problem. A key feature of environmental mixtures is that some components can be highly correlated, raising the issues of confounding by coexposure and colinearity. A relatively unexplored topic in epidemiologic analysis of mixtures is the impact of residual confounding bias due to unmeasured or unknown variables. OBJECTIVES: This paper examines the potential amplification of such biases when correlated exposure variables are included in regression models. METHODS: We use directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to describe different simple scenarios involving residual confounding. We derive expressions for the expected value of the resulting bias using linear models and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Approaches to the analysis of mixtures that involve regressing the outcome on several exposures simultaneously can in some cases amplify rather than reduce confounding bias. DISCUSSIONS: The problem of bias amplification can worsen with stronger correlation between mixture components or when more mixture components are included in the model. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators must consider steps to minimize possible bias amplification in the design and analysis of epidemiologic studies of multiple correlated exposures. This may be particularly important when biomarkers of exposure are used. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2450
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6071813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Environmental Health Perspectives
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60718132018-08-07 Bias Amplification in Epidemiologic Analysis of Exposure to Mixtures Weisskopf, Marc G. Seals, Ryan M. Webster, Thomas F. Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: The analysis of health effects of exposure to mixtures is a critically important issue in human epidemiology, and increasing effort is being devoted to developing methods for this problem. A key feature of environmental mixtures is that some components can be highly correlated, raising the issues of confounding by coexposure and colinearity. A relatively unexplored topic in epidemiologic analysis of mixtures is the impact of residual confounding bias due to unmeasured or unknown variables. OBJECTIVES: This paper examines the potential amplification of such biases when correlated exposure variables are included in regression models. METHODS: We use directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to describe different simple scenarios involving residual confounding. We derive expressions for the expected value of the resulting bias using linear models and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Approaches to the analysis of mixtures that involve regressing the outcome on several exposures simultaneously can in some cases amplify rather than reduce confounding bias. DISCUSSIONS: The problem of bias amplification can worsen with stronger correlation between mixture components or when more mixture components are included in the model. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators must consider steps to minimize possible bias amplification in the design and analysis of epidemiologic studies of multiple correlated exposures. This may be particularly important when biomarkers of exposure are used. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2450 Environmental Health Perspectives 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6071813/ /pubmed/29624292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP2450 Text en EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted.
spellingShingle Research
Weisskopf, Marc G.
Seals, Ryan M.
Webster, Thomas F.
Bias Amplification in Epidemiologic Analysis of Exposure to Mixtures
title Bias Amplification in Epidemiologic Analysis of Exposure to Mixtures
title_full Bias Amplification in Epidemiologic Analysis of Exposure to Mixtures
title_fullStr Bias Amplification in Epidemiologic Analysis of Exposure to Mixtures
title_full_unstemmed Bias Amplification in Epidemiologic Analysis of Exposure to Mixtures
title_short Bias Amplification in Epidemiologic Analysis of Exposure to Mixtures
title_sort bias amplification in epidemiologic analysis of exposure to mixtures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29624292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP2450
work_keys_str_mv AT weisskopfmarcg biasamplificationinepidemiologicanalysisofexposuretomixtures
AT sealsryanm biasamplificationinepidemiologicanalysisofexposuretomixtures
AT websterthomasf biasamplificationinepidemiologicanalysisofexposuretomixtures