Cargando…
Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities
Purpose: Referral access to subspecialty care for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) diseases is not well defined, but has significant importance to patients. We hypothesized that patients experience barriers to care in two common gastroenterology subspecialties, Hepatology and Motility, in a unive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2018.0001 |
_version_ | 1783343939558834176 |
---|---|
author | Reddy, Kartika Patrick, Caitlyn Liaquat, Hammad Rodriquez, Edmundo Stocker, Abigail Cave, Barbra Cave, Matt C. Smart, Laura Cutts, Teresa Abell, Thomas |
author_facet | Reddy, Kartika Patrick, Caitlyn Liaquat, Hammad Rodriquez, Edmundo Stocker, Abigail Cave, Barbra Cave, Matt C. Smart, Laura Cutts, Teresa Abell, Thomas |
author_sort | Reddy, Kartika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Referral access to subspecialty care for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) diseases is not well defined, but has significant importance to patients. We hypothesized that patients experience barriers to care in two common gastroenterology subspecialties, Hepatology and Motility, in a university medical center. Methods: Two hundred thirteen clinic patients (mean age 46.5 years; 66.5% female; 85.6% Caucasians) completed a formatted questionnaire on access to care. Hepatology patients were older (49.7 years, p=0.008); motility patients predominantly female (76.8%, p<0.001). Gender distribution was even for hepatology (51.2% female). Both groups were overweight (mean body mass index 28.4). Results: Patients waited a mean 89.5 days to be seen by a subspecialist. There were differences by subspecialty (107.6 days for motility vs. 64.3 days for hepatology, p=0.022). A larger percentage of motility patients were told nothing was wrong with them (16.8%, p<0.01) and could not be helped (42.1%, p=0.000). Conclusions: Access to care for subspecialty gastroenterology patients in a university center appears to be impacted by a number of variables. While there are similarities, differences exist between these two subspecialties. Motility patients were more likely to have been told they have nothing wrong with them, suffer setbacks financially, and suffer mood problems. Their wait time for appointments was also greater than hepatology patients. Further investigations of referral access for gastroenterology patients may yield additional insights into disease-specific barriers to accessing subspecialty care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6071906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60719062018-10-03 Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities Reddy, Kartika Patrick, Caitlyn Liaquat, Hammad Rodriquez, Edmundo Stocker, Abigail Cave, Barbra Cave, Matt C. Smart, Laura Cutts, Teresa Abell, Thomas Health Equity Original Article Purpose: Referral access to subspecialty care for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) diseases is not well defined, but has significant importance to patients. We hypothesized that patients experience barriers to care in two common gastroenterology subspecialties, Hepatology and Motility, in a university medical center. Methods: Two hundred thirteen clinic patients (mean age 46.5 years; 66.5% female; 85.6% Caucasians) completed a formatted questionnaire on access to care. Hepatology patients were older (49.7 years, p=0.008); motility patients predominantly female (76.8%, p<0.001). Gender distribution was even for hepatology (51.2% female). Both groups were overweight (mean body mass index 28.4). Results: Patients waited a mean 89.5 days to be seen by a subspecialist. There were differences by subspecialty (107.6 days for motility vs. 64.3 days for hepatology, p=0.022). A larger percentage of motility patients were told nothing was wrong with them (16.8%, p<0.01) and could not be helped (42.1%, p=0.000). Conclusions: Access to care for subspecialty gastroenterology patients in a university center appears to be impacted by a number of variables. While there are similarities, differences exist between these two subspecialties. Motility patients were more likely to have been told they have nothing wrong with them, suffer setbacks financially, and suffer mood problems. Their wait time for appointments was also greater than hepatology patients. Further investigations of referral access for gastroenterology patients may yield additional insights into disease-specific barriers to accessing subspecialty care. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6071906/ /pubmed/30283855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2018.0001 Text en © Kartika Reddy et al. 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Reddy, Kartika Patrick, Caitlyn Liaquat, Hammad Rodriquez, Edmundo Stocker, Abigail Cave, Barbra Cave, Matt C. Smart, Laura Cutts, Teresa Abell, Thomas Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities |
title | Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities |
title_full | Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities |
title_fullStr | Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities |
title_short | Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities |
title_sort | differences in referral access to care between gastrointestinal subspecialty patients: barriers and opportunities |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2018.0001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reddykartika differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities AT patrickcaitlyn differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities AT liaquathammad differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities AT rodriquezedmundo differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities AT stockerabigail differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities AT cavebarbra differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities AT cavemattc differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities AT smartlaura differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities AT cuttsteresa differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities AT abellthomas differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities |