Cargando…

Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities

Purpose: Referral access to subspecialty care for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) diseases is not well defined, but has significant importance to patients. We hypothesized that patients experience barriers to care in two common gastroenterology subspecialties, Hepatology and Motility, in a unive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reddy, Kartika, Patrick, Caitlyn, Liaquat, Hammad, Rodriquez, Edmundo, Stocker, Abigail, Cave, Barbra, Cave, Matt C., Smart, Laura, Cutts, Teresa, Abell, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2018.0001
_version_ 1783343939558834176
author Reddy, Kartika
Patrick, Caitlyn
Liaquat, Hammad
Rodriquez, Edmundo
Stocker, Abigail
Cave, Barbra
Cave, Matt C.
Smart, Laura
Cutts, Teresa
Abell, Thomas
author_facet Reddy, Kartika
Patrick, Caitlyn
Liaquat, Hammad
Rodriquez, Edmundo
Stocker, Abigail
Cave, Barbra
Cave, Matt C.
Smart, Laura
Cutts, Teresa
Abell, Thomas
author_sort Reddy, Kartika
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Referral access to subspecialty care for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) diseases is not well defined, but has significant importance to patients. We hypothesized that patients experience barriers to care in two common gastroenterology subspecialties, Hepatology and Motility, in a university medical center. Methods: Two hundred thirteen clinic patients (mean age 46.5 years; 66.5% female; 85.6% Caucasians) completed a formatted questionnaire on access to care. Hepatology patients were older (49.7 years, p=0.008); motility patients predominantly female (76.8%, p<0.001). Gender distribution was even for hepatology (51.2% female). Both groups were overweight (mean body mass index 28.4). Results: Patients waited a mean 89.5 days to be seen by a subspecialist. There were differences by subspecialty (107.6 days for motility vs. 64.3 days for hepatology, p=0.022). A larger percentage of motility patients were told nothing was wrong with them (16.8%, p<0.01) and could not be helped (42.1%, p=0.000). Conclusions: Access to care for subspecialty gastroenterology patients in a university center appears to be impacted by a number of variables. While there are similarities, differences exist between these two subspecialties. Motility patients were more likely to have been told they have nothing wrong with them, suffer setbacks financially, and suffer mood problems. Their wait time for appointments was also greater than hepatology patients. Further investigations of referral access for gastroenterology patients may yield additional insights into disease-specific barriers to accessing subspecialty care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6071906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60719062018-10-03 Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities Reddy, Kartika Patrick, Caitlyn Liaquat, Hammad Rodriquez, Edmundo Stocker, Abigail Cave, Barbra Cave, Matt C. Smart, Laura Cutts, Teresa Abell, Thomas Health Equity Original Article Purpose: Referral access to subspecialty care for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) diseases is not well defined, but has significant importance to patients. We hypothesized that patients experience barriers to care in two common gastroenterology subspecialties, Hepatology and Motility, in a university medical center. Methods: Two hundred thirteen clinic patients (mean age 46.5 years; 66.5% female; 85.6% Caucasians) completed a formatted questionnaire on access to care. Hepatology patients were older (49.7 years, p=0.008); motility patients predominantly female (76.8%, p<0.001). Gender distribution was even for hepatology (51.2% female). Both groups were overweight (mean body mass index 28.4). Results: Patients waited a mean 89.5 days to be seen by a subspecialist. There were differences by subspecialty (107.6 days for motility vs. 64.3 days for hepatology, p=0.022). A larger percentage of motility patients were told nothing was wrong with them (16.8%, p<0.01) and could not be helped (42.1%, p=0.000). Conclusions: Access to care for subspecialty gastroenterology patients in a university center appears to be impacted by a number of variables. While there are similarities, differences exist between these two subspecialties. Motility patients were more likely to have been told they have nothing wrong with them, suffer setbacks financially, and suffer mood problems. Their wait time for appointments was also greater than hepatology patients. Further investigations of referral access for gastroenterology patients may yield additional insights into disease-specific barriers to accessing subspecialty care. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6071906/ /pubmed/30283855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2018.0001 Text en © Kartika Reddy et al. 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Reddy, Kartika
Patrick, Caitlyn
Liaquat, Hammad
Rodriquez, Edmundo
Stocker, Abigail
Cave, Barbra
Cave, Matt C.
Smart, Laura
Cutts, Teresa
Abell, Thomas
Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities
title Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities
title_full Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities
title_fullStr Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities
title_short Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities
title_sort differences in referral access to care between gastrointestinal subspecialty patients: barriers and opportunities
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6071906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2018.0001
work_keys_str_mv AT reddykartika differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities
AT patrickcaitlyn differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities
AT liaquathammad differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities
AT rodriquezedmundo differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities
AT stockerabigail differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities
AT cavebarbra differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities
AT cavemattc differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities
AT smartlaura differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities
AT cuttsteresa differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities
AT abellthomas differencesinreferralaccesstocarebetweengastrointestinalsubspecialtypatientsbarriersandopportunities