Cargando…
Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study
STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the long-term clinical results of decompression alone, decompression plus fusion, and decompression plus stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Symptoms of lumb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6072383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29877872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000659 |
_version_ | 1783344012726370304 |
---|---|
author | Inose, Hiroyuki Kato, Tsuyoshi Yuasa, Masato Yamada, Tsuyoshi Maehara, Hidetsugu Hirai, Takashi Yoshii, Toshitaka Kawabata, Shigenori Okawa, Atsushi |
author_facet | Inose, Hiroyuki Kato, Tsuyoshi Yuasa, Masato Yamada, Tsuyoshi Maehara, Hidetsugu Hirai, Takashi Yoshii, Toshitaka Kawabata, Shigenori Okawa, Atsushi |
author_sort | Inose, Hiroyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the long-term clinical results of decompression alone, decompression plus fusion, and decompression plus stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis originate from compression of the dural sac or nerve root. Essentially, this condition is treated by performing a decompression of neural structures. Posterolateral lumbar fusion and posterior pedicle-based dynamic stabilization are additional techniques performed to ensure improved prognosis. However, to date, the selection of a surgical procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis remains debatable, especially in terms of the addition of instrumentation because of the few available prospective, randomized studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned patients who had 1 level lumbar spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis at the L4/5 level to undergo either decompression alone (decompression group), decompression plus fusion (fusion group), or decompression plus stabilization (stabilization group). Outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Visual Analogue Scale scores. RESULTS: In total, 85 patients underwent randomization. The follow-up rate at 5 years was 86.4%. The fusion and stabilization groups showed higher blood loss and a longer operative time than the decompression group. The fusion group showed longer postoperative hospital stay than the decompression group. In terms of clinical outcomes, all scores significantly improved postoperatively, and these outcomes were maintained at 5 years postoperatively in each group. There were no significant differences among the groups at 1 and 5 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Additional instrumentation operation for low-grade (<30%) degenerative spondylolisthesis did not result in superior results to decompression alone at 1 and 5 years postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6072383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60723832018-08-17 Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study Inose, Hiroyuki Kato, Tsuyoshi Yuasa, Masato Yamada, Tsuyoshi Maehara, Hidetsugu Hirai, Takashi Yoshii, Toshitaka Kawabata, Shigenori Okawa, Atsushi Clin Spine Surg Primary Research STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the long-term clinical results of decompression alone, decompression plus fusion, and decompression plus stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis originate from compression of the dural sac or nerve root. Essentially, this condition is treated by performing a decompression of neural structures. Posterolateral lumbar fusion and posterior pedicle-based dynamic stabilization are additional techniques performed to ensure improved prognosis. However, to date, the selection of a surgical procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis remains debatable, especially in terms of the addition of instrumentation because of the few available prospective, randomized studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned patients who had 1 level lumbar spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis at the L4/5 level to undergo either decompression alone (decompression group), decompression plus fusion (fusion group), or decompression plus stabilization (stabilization group). Outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Visual Analogue Scale scores. RESULTS: In total, 85 patients underwent randomization. The follow-up rate at 5 years was 86.4%. The fusion and stabilization groups showed higher blood loss and a longer operative time than the decompression group. The fusion group showed longer postoperative hospital stay than the decompression group. In terms of clinical outcomes, all scores significantly improved postoperatively, and these outcomes were maintained at 5 years postoperatively in each group. There were no significant differences among the groups at 1 and 5 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Additional instrumentation operation for low-grade (<30%) degenerative spondylolisthesis did not result in superior results to decompression alone at 1 and 5 years postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. Wolters Kluwer 2018-08 2018-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6072383/ /pubmed/29877872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000659 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Primary Research Inose, Hiroyuki Kato, Tsuyoshi Yuasa, Masato Yamada, Tsuyoshi Maehara, Hidetsugu Hirai, Takashi Yoshii, Toshitaka Kawabata, Shigenori Okawa, Atsushi Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study |
title | Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study |
title_full | Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study |
title_short | Comparison of Decompression, Decompression Plus Fusion, and Decompression Plus Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Randomized Study |
title_sort | comparison of decompression, decompression plus fusion, and decompression plus stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a prospective, randomized study |
topic | Primary Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6072383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29877872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inosehiroyuki comparisonofdecompressiondecompressionplusfusionanddecompressionplusstabilizationfordegenerativespondylolisthesisaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT katotsuyoshi comparisonofdecompressiondecompressionplusfusionanddecompressionplusstabilizationfordegenerativespondylolisthesisaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT yuasamasato comparisonofdecompressiondecompressionplusfusionanddecompressionplusstabilizationfordegenerativespondylolisthesisaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT yamadatsuyoshi comparisonofdecompressiondecompressionplusfusionanddecompressionplusstabilizationfordegenerativespondylolisthesisaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT maeharahidetsugu comparisonofdecompressiondecompressionplusfusionanddecompressionplusstabilizationfordegenerativespondylolisthesisaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT hiraitakashi comparisonofdecompressiondecompressionplusfusionanddecompressionplusstabilizationfordegenerativespondylolisthesisaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT yoshiitoshitaka comparisonofdecompressiondecompressionplusfusionanddecompressionplusstabilizationfordegenerativespondylolisthesisaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT kawabatashigenori comparisonofdecompressiondecompressionplusfusionanddecompressionplusstabilizationfordegenerativespondylolisthesisaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT okawaatsushi comparisonofdecompressiondecompressionplusfusionanddecompressionplusstabilizationfordegenerativespondylolisthesisaprospectiverandomizedstudy |