Cargando…

Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance (MPA) application in adolescent and adult Class II malocclusion patients. METHODS: The sample comprised the pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 39...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furquim, Bruno D’Aurea, Janson, Guilherme, Cope, Laura de Castro Cabrera, Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore, Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6072451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30088567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.3.063-072.oar
_version_ 1783344022039822336
author Furquim, Bruno D’Aurea
Janson, Guilherme
Cope, Laura de Castro Cabrera
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
author_facet Furquim, Bruno D’Aurea
Janson, Guilherme
Cope, Laura de Castro Cabrera
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
author_sort Furquim, Bruno D’Aurea
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance (MPA) application in adolescent and adult Class II malocclusion patients. METHODS: The sample comprised the pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 39 subjects presenting Class II malocclusion treated with the MPA and fixed appliances. Sample was divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised 23 subjects (10 male; 13 female), at a mean pretreatment age of 11.75 years, with a mean treatment time of 3.32 years; Group 2 included 16 subjects (7 male; 9 female), at a mean pretreatment age of 22.41 years, with a mean treatment time of 4.24 years. Intergroup comparison of the initial and final stages and treatment changes between the groups was performed with t tests, at p< 0.05. RESULTS: The adults showed less significant amounts of skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes than the adolescents. There was significantly greater palatal tipping of the maxillary incisors and retrusion of the upper lip in the adolescents. The adult group showed greater mandibular incisor proclination in the posttreatment stage. CONCLUSION: Adult patients treated with MPA showed less significant amounts of skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes than adolescents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6072451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60724512018-08-06 Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults Furquim, Bruno D’Aurea Janson, Guilherme Cope, Laura de Castro Cabrera Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore Henriques, José Fernando Castanha Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance (MPA) application in adolescent and adult Class II malocclusion patients. METHODS: The sample comprised the pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 39 subjects presenting Class II malocclusion treated with the MPA and fixed appliances. Sample was divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised 23 subjects (10 male; 13 female), at a mean pretreatment age of 11.75 years, with a mean treatment time of 3.32 years; Group 2 included 16 subjects (7 male; 9 female), at a mean pretreatment age of 22.41 years, with a mean treatment time of 4.24 years. Intergroup comparison of the initial and final stages and treatment changes between the groups was performed with t tests, at p< 0.05. RESULTS: The adults showed less significant amounts of skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes than the adolescents. There was significantly greater palatal tipping of the maxillary incisors and retrusion of the upper lip in the adolescents. The adult group showed greater mandibular incisor proclination in the posttreatment stage. CONCLUSION: Adult patients treated with MPA showed less significant amounts of skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes than adolescents. Dental Press International 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6072451/ /pubmed/30088567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.3.063-072.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Furquim, Bruno D’Aurea
Janson, Guilherme
Cope, Laura de Castro Cabrera
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Henriques, José Fernando Castanha
Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults
title Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults
title_full Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults
title_fullStr Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults
title_short Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults
title_sort comparative effects of the mandibular protraction appliance in adolescents and adults
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6072451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30088567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.3.063-072.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT furquimbrunodaurea comparativeeffectsofthemandibularprotractionapplianceinadolescentsandadults
AT jansonguilherme comparativeeffectsofthemandibularprotractionapplianceinadolescentsandadults
AT copelauradecastrocabrera comparativeeffectsofthemandibularprotractionapplianceinadolescentsandadults
AT freitaskarinamariasalvatore comparativeeffectsofthemandibularprotractionapplianceinadolescentsandadults
AT henriquesjosefernandocastanha comparativeeffectsofthemandibularprotractionapplianceinadolescentsandadults