Cargando…

Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review

Background: A large number of health economic evaluation (HEE) studies have been published in developed countries. However, Brazilian HEE literature in oncology has not been studied. Objective: To investigate whether the scientific literature has provided a set of HEE in oncology capable of supporti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campolina, Alessandro G., Yuba, Tania Y., Decimoni, Tassia C., Leandro, Roseli, Diz, Maria del Pilar Estevez, Novaes, Hillegonda M. D., de Soárez, Patrícia C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6072849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30101142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00205
_version_ 1783344071401537536
author Campolina, Alessandro G.
Yuba, Tania Y.
Decimoni, Tassia C.
Leandro, Roseli
Diz, Maria del Pilar Estevez
Novaes, Hillegonda M. D.
de Soárez, Patrícia C.
author_facet Campolina, Alessandro G.
Yuba, Tania Y.
Decimoni, Tassia C.
Leandro, Roseli
Diz, Maria del Pilar Estevez
Novaes, Hillegonda M. D.
de Soárez, Patrícia C.
author_sort Campolina, Alessandro G.
collection PubMed
description Background: A large number of health economic evaluation (HEE) studies have been published in developed countries. However, Brazilian HEE literature in oncology has not been studied. Objective: To investigate whether the scientific literature has provided a set of HEE in oncology capable of supporting decision making in the Brazilian context. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify and characterize studies in this field. We searched multiple databases selecting partial and full HEE studies in oncology (1998-2013). Results: Fifty-five articles were reviewed, of these, 33 (60%) were full health economic evaluations. Type of cancers most frequently studied were: breast (38.2%), cervical (14.6%), lung (10.9%) and colorectal (9.1%). Procedures (47.3%) were the technologies most frequently evaluated. In terms of the intended purposes of the technologies, most (63.6%) were treatments. The majority of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) reported have been below the cost-effectiveness threshold suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO). Conclusions: There has been an increase in the number of HEEs related to cancer in Brazil. These studies may support decision-making processes regarding the coverage of and reimbursement of healthcare technologies for cancer treatment in Brazil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6072849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60728492018-08-10 Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review Campolina, Alessandro G. Yuba, Tania Y. Decimoni, Tassia C. Leandro, Roseli Diz, Maria del Pilar Estevez Novaes, Hillegonda M. D. de Soárez, Patrícia C. Front Public Health Public Health Background: A large number of health economic evaluation (HEE) studies have been published in developed countries. However, Brazilian HEE literature in oncology has not been studied. Objective: To investigate whether the scientific literature has provided a set of HEE in oncology capable of supporting decision making in the Brazilian context. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify and characterize studies in this field. We searched multiple databases selecting partial and full HEE studies in oncology (1998-2013). Results: Fifty-five articles were reviewed, of these, 33 (60%) were full health economic evaluations. Type of cancers most frequently studied were: breast (38.2%), cervical (14.6%), lung (10.9%) and colorectal (9.1%). Procedures (47.3%) were the technologies most frequently evaluated. In terms of the intended purposes of the technologies, most (63.6%) were treatments. The majority of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) reported have been below the cost-effectiveness threshold suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO). Conclusions: There has been an increase in the number of HEEs related to cancer in Brazil. These studies may support decision-making processes regarding the coverage of and reimbursement of healthcare technologies for cancer treatment in Brazil. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6072849/ /pubmed/30101142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00205 Text en Copyright © 2018 Campolina, Yuba, Decimoni, Leandro, Diz, Novaes and de Soárez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Campolina, Alessandro G.
Yuba, Tania Y.
Decimoni, Tassia C.
Leandro, Roseli
Diz, Maria del Pilar Estevez
Novaes, Hillegonda M. D.
de Soárez, Patrícia C.
Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review
title Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review
title_full Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review
title_short Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review
title_sort health economic evaluations of cancer in brazil: a systematic review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6072849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30101142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00205
work_keys_str_mv AT campolinaalessandrog healtheconomicevaluationsofcancerinbrazilasystematicreview
AT yubataniay healtheconomicevaluationsofcancerinbrazilasystematicreview
AT decimonitassiac healtheconomicevaluationsofcancerinbrazilasystematicreview
AT leandroroseli healtheconomicevaluationsofcancerinbrazilasystematicreview
AT dizmariadelpilarestevez healtheconomicevaluationsofcancerinbrazilasystematicreview
AT novaeshillegondamd healtheconomicevaluationsofcancerinbrazilasystematicreview
AT desoarezpatriciac healtheconomicevaluationsofcancerinbrazilasystematicreview