Cargando…
Building clinical trials around patients: Evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain
Clinical trials are slow and costly, built around the research centers that study local participants. Building clinical trials around patients in their homes and community through remote visits and monitoring could enhance recruitment and increase convenience for participants. This study evaluated d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6072894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2018.06.008 |
_version_ | 1783344081669193728 |
---|---|
author | Sommer, Carsten Zuccolin, Diego Arnera, Valdo Schmitz, Nicole Adolfsson, Pernilla Colombo, Nicoletta Gilg, Raphaelle McDowell, Bryan |
author_facet | Sommer, Carsten Zuccolin, Diego Arnera, Valdo Schmitz, Nicole Adolfsson, Pernilla Colombo, Nicoletta Gilg, Raphaelle McDowell, Bryan |
author_sort | Sommer, Carsten |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical trials are slow and costly, built around the research centers that study local participants. Building clinical trials around patients in their homes and community through remote visits and monitoring could enhance recruitment and increase convenience for participants. This study evaluated different trial settings, a decentralized arm via telemedicine center (virtual study conduct), a conventional arm via health clinic (onsite study conduct) and a mixed model arm. Acute low-back pain patients (20–65 years) were recruited to this non-interventional trial in Switzerland. The study consisted of a screening period and a 2-week data collection period using direct data capture (eSource), electronic informed consent form (eICF), electronic diary (eDiary) and wearable actigraphy sensor. A higher number of patients were enrolled in the decentralized arm (N = 18) compared to the conventional arm (N = 5) and none in the mixed model arm. The decentralized arm consisted of a diverse population with increased participation from rural areas. In the decentralized arm 89% of enrolled patients completed the study compared to 60% in the conventional arm. All the patients reported satisfaction with the use of eICF, eDiary and remote visits; whereas patients reported a lower level of satisfaction with the wearable sensor. The decentralized setting was operationally feasible and well accepted by patients. Faster recruitment and improved access to patients was observed in the decentralized arm. This study supports broader adoption of the decentralized model in clinical trials, though further investigations in larger interventional trials are needed to confirm the benefits from this patient-centric approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6072894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60728942018-08-09 Building clinical trials around patients: Evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain Sommer, Carsten Zuccolin, Diego Arnera, Valdo Schmitz, Nicole Adolfsson, Pernilla Colombo, Nicoletta Gilg, Raphaelle McDowell, Bryan Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article Clinical trials are slow and costly, built around the research centers that study local participants. Building clinical trials around patients in their homes and community through remote visits and monitoring could enhance recruitment and increase convenience for participants. This study evaluated different trial settings, a decentralized arm via telemedicine center (virtual study conduct), a conventional arm via health clinic (onsite study conduct) and a mixed model arm. Acute low-back pain patients (20–65 years) were recruited to this non-interventional trial in Switzerland. The study consisted of a screening period and a 2-week data collection period using direct data capture (eSource), electronic informed consent form (eICF), electronic diary (eDiary) and wearable actigraphy sensor. A higher number of patients were enrolled in the decentralized arm (N = 18) compared to the conventional arm (N = 5) and none in the mixed model arm. The decentralized arm consisted of a diverse population with increased participation from rural areas. In the decentralized arm 89% of enrolled patients completed the study compared to 60% in the conventional arm. All the patients reported satisfaction with the use of eICF, eDiary and remote visits; whereas patients reported a lower level of satisfaction with the wearable sensor. The decentralized setting was operationally feasible and well accepted by patients. Faster recruitment and improved access to patients was observed in the decentralized arm. This study supports broader adoption of the decentralized model in clinical trials, though further investigations in larger interventional trials are needed to confirm the benefits from this patient-centric approach. Elsevier 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6072894/ /pubmed/30094387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2018.06.008 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sommer, Carsten Zuccolin, Diego Arnera, Valdo Schmitz, Nicole Adolfsson, Pernilla Colombo, Nicoletta Gilg, Raphaelle McDowell, Bryan Building clinical trials around patients: Evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain |
title | Building clinical trials around patients: Evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain |
title_full | Building clinical trials around patients: Evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain |
title_fullStr | Building clinical trials around patients: Evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Building clinical trials around patients: Evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain |
title_short | Building clinical trials around patients: Evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain |
title_sort | building clinical trials around patients: evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6072894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2018.06.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sommercarsten buildingclinicaltrialsaroundpatientsevaluationandcomparisonofdecentralizedandconventionalsitemodelsinpatientswithlowbackpain AT zuccolindiego buildingclinicaltrialsaroundpatientsevaluationandcomparisonofdecentralizedandconventionalsitemodelsinpatientswithlowbackpain AT arneravaldo buildingclinicaltrialsaroundpatientsevaluationandcomparisonofdecentralizedandconventionalsitemodelsinpatientswithlowbackpain AT schmitznicole buildingclinicaltrialsaroundpatientsevaluationandcomparisonofdecentralizedandconventionalsitemodelsinpatientswithlowbackpain AT adolfssonpernilla buildingclinicaltrialsaroundpatientsevaluationandcomparisonofdecentralizedandconventionalsitemodelsinpatientswithlowbackpain AT colombonicoletta buildingclinicaltrialsaroundpatientsevaluationandcomparisonofdecentralizedandconventionalsitemodelsinpatientswithlowbackpain AT gilgraphaelle buildingclinicaltrialsaroundpatientsevaluationandcomparisonofdecentralizedandconventionalsitemodelsinpatientswithlowbackpain AT mcdowellbryan buildingclinicaltrialsaroundpatientsevaluationandcomparisonofdecentralizedandconventionalsitemodelsinpatientswithlowbackpain |