Cargando…

A systematic recurrent theme analysis of the reported limitations of facial electromyography

BACKGROUND: Advances in digital technology hold promise in expanding the clinical and consumer applications of facial electromyography (EMG) through thedevelopment of wireless pervasive systems capable of operating in a nonclinical environment. This systematic review aims to appraise the most common...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geoghegan, L., Kwasnicki, R.M., Kanabar, S., Pethers, D., Nduka, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6072910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.07.006
_version_ 1783344085367521280
author Geoghegan, L.
Kwasnicki, R.M.
Kanabar, S.
Pethers, D.
Nduka, C.
author_facet Geoghegan, L.
Kwasnicki, R.M.
Kanabar, S.
Pethers, D.
Nduka, C.
author_sort Geoghegan, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advances in digital technology hold promise in expanding the clinical and consumer applications of facial electromyography (EMG) through thedevelopment of wireless pervasive systems capable of operating in a nonclinical environment. This systematic review aims to appraise the most commonly reported limitations of the technology in clinical research and practice. METHODS: A systematic search for clinical facial EMG literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and CINAHL. No language limits were applied. Search results were screened using defined criteria by two authors with disagreements resolved by a third. Practical limitations in the technology, as reported by the authors, were recorded and characterised using recurrent theme analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4,983 records were identified. Of those, 1,061 articles met eligibility criteria and were subsequently reviewed. In the medical domain, the most common area of application was in psychosocial studies (28% of medical studies); in the surgical domain monitoring of facial nerve integrity was the most common application of facial electromyography (27% of surgical studies). Collectively, the three most commonly reported limitations were motion artefact (13.7%), inter-subject variability in response and anatomy (13.1%), and muscle crosstalk (12.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the limitations of facial EMG using a systematic analysis of author reports. Highlighting technology limitations in this non-biased manner raises awareness to users key issues and reliably informs the development of future systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6072910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60729102018-08-09 A systematic recurrent theme analysis of the reported limitations of facial electromyography Geoghegan, L. Kwasnicki, R.M. Kanabar, S. Pethers, D. Nduka, C. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Review Article BACKGROUND: Advances in digital technology hold promise in expanding the clinical and consumer applications of facial electromyography (EMG) through thedevelopment of wireless pervasive systems capable of operating in a nonclinical environment. This systematic review aims to appraise the most commonly reported limitations of the technology in clinical research and practice. METHODS: A systematic search for clinical facial EMG literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and CINAHL. No language limits were applied. Search results were screened using defined criteria by two authors with disagreements resolved by a third. Practical limitations in the technology, as reported by the authors, were recorded and characterised using recurrent theme analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4,983 records were identified. Of those, 1,061 articles met eligibility criteria and were subsequently reviewed. In the medical domain, the most common area of application was in psychosocial studies (28% of medical studies); in the surgical domain monitoring of facial nerve integrity was the most common application of facial electromyography (27% of surgical studies). Collectively, the three most commonly reported limitations were motion artefact (13.7%), inter-subject variability in response and anatomy (13.1%), and muscle crosstalk (12.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the limitations of facial EMG using a systematic analysis of author reports. Highlighting technology limitations in this non-biased manner raises awareness to users key issues and reliably informs the development of future systems. Elsevier 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6072910/ /pubmed/30094024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.07.006 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Geoghegan, L.
Kwasnicki, R.M.
Kanabar, S.
Pethers, D.
Nduka, C.
A systematic recurrent theme analysis of the reported limitations of facial electromyography
title A systematic recurrent theme analysis of the reported limitations of facial electromyography
title_full A systematic recurrent theme analysis of the reported limitations of facial electromyography
title_fullStr A systematic recurrent theme analysis of the reported limitations of facial electromyography
title_full_unstemmed A systematic recurrent theme analysis of the reported limitations of facial electromyography
title_short A systematic recurrent theme analysis of the reported limitations of facial electromyography
title_sort systematic recurrent theme analysis of the reported limitations of facial electromyography
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6072910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.07.006
work_keys_str_mv AT geogheganl asystematicrecurrentthemeanalysisofthereportedlimitationsoffacialelectromyography
AT kwasnickirm asystematicrecurrentthemeanalysisofthereportedlimitationsoffacialelectromyography
AT kanabars asystematicrecurrentthemeanalysisofthereportedlimitationsoffacialelectromyography
AT pethersd asystematicrecurrentthemeanalysisofthereportedlimitationsoffacialelectromyography
AT ndukac asystematicrecurrentthemeanalysisofthereportedlimitationsoffacialelectromyography
AT geogheganl systematicrecurrentthemeanalysisofthereportedlimitationsoffacialelectromyography
AT kwasnickirm systematicrecurrentthemeanalysisofthereportedlimitationsoffacialelectromyography
AT kanabars systematicrecurrentthemeanalysisofthereportedlimitationsoffacialelectromyography
AT pethersd systematicrecurrentthemeanalysisofthereportedlimitationsoffacialelectromyography
AT ndukac systematicrecurrentthemeanalysisofthereportedlimitationsoffacialelectromyography