Cargando…

Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs)

Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have been introduced into orthodontic clinical practice in order to allow tooth movements while avoiding strain on adjacent teeth. Miniscrews are available in the market with different diameters and materials. Accordingly, the purpose of the present report was to m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scribante, Andrea, Montasser, Mona A., Radwan, Eman Saad, Bernardinelli, Luisa, Alcozer, Roberto, Gandini, Paola, Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11071138
_version_ 1783344129222115328
author Scribante, Andrea
Montasser, Mona A.
Radwan, Eman Saad
Bernardinelli, Luisa
Alcozer, Roberto
Gandini, Paola
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
author_facet Scribante, Andrea
Montasser, Mona A.
Radwan, Eman Saad
Bernardinelli, Luisa
Alcozer, Roberto
Gandini, Paola
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
author_sort Scribante, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have been introduced into orthodontic clinical practice in order to allow tooth movements while avoiding strain on adjacent teeth. Miniscrews are available in the market with different diameters and materials. Accordingly, the purpose of the present report was to measure and compare the forces to bend and fracture different mini implants. Ti-6Al-4V titanium and stainless steel TADs of different manufacturers (Spider ScrewHDC; Mini Implants–Leone; Benefit–Orteam; Storm–Kristal) were evaluated. Two different diameters (1.5 mm and 2.0 mm) were tested. The sample included 10 unused specimens for each group, blocked in an Instron Universal Testing Machine, and a shear load was applied at the neck of the miniscrew. The force to bend the miniscrew was measured at 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm deflections. Also, the maximum force before screw fracture was recorded. Data were submitted for statistical analysis. Results showed significantly higher forces for 2.0 mm than 1.5 mm screws, both at 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm deflections and at maximum load. Moreover, no significant differences were reported between titanium and stainless steel miniscrews of equal diameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6073155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60731552018-08-13 Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) Scribante, Andrea Montasser, Mona A. Radwan, Eman Saad Bernardinelli, Luisa Alcozer, Roberto Gandini, Paola Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Materials (Basel) Article Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have been introduced into orthodontic clinical practice in order to allow tooth movements while avoiding strain on adjacent teeth. Miniscrews are available in the market with different diameters and materials. Accordingly, the purpose of the present report was to measure and compare the forces to bend and fracture different mini implants. Ti-6Al-4V titanium and stainless steel TADs of different manufacturers (Spider ScrewHDC; Mini Implants–Leone; Benefit–Orteam; Storm–Kristal) were evaluated. Two different diameters (1.5 mm and 2.0 mm) were tested. The sample included 10 unused specimens for each group, blocked in an Instron Universal Testing Machine, and a shear load was applied at the neck of the miniscrew. The force to bend the miniscrew was measured at 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm deflections. Also, the maximum force before screw fracture was recorded. Data were submitted for statistical analysis. Results showed significantly higher forces for 2.0 mm than 1.5 mm screws, both at 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm deflections and at maximum load. Moreover, no significant differences were reported between titanium and stainless steel miniscrews of equal diameters. MDPI 2018-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6073155/ /pubmed/29976856 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11071138 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Scribante, Andrea
Montasser, Mona A.
Radwan, Eman Saad
Bernardinelli, Luisa
Alcozer, Roberto
Gandini, Paola
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs)
title Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs)
title_full Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs)
title_fullStr Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs)
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs)
title_short Reliability of Orthodontic Miniscrews: Bending and Maximum Load of Different Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and Stainless Steel Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs)
title_sort reliability of orthodontic miniscrews: bending and maximum load of different ti-6al-4v titanium and stainless steel temporary anchorage devices (tads)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976856
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11071138
work_keys_str_mv AT scribanteandrea reliabilityoforthodonticminiscrewsbendingandmaximumloadofdifferentti6al4vtitaniumandstainlesssteeltemporaryanchoragedevicestads
AT montassermonaa reliabilityoforthodonticminiscrewsbendingandmaximumloadofdifferentti6al4vtitaniumandstainlesssteeltemporaryanchoragedevicestads
AT radwanemansaad reliabilityoforthodonticminiscrewsbendingandmaximumloadofdifferentti6al4vtitaniumandstainlesssteeltemporaryanchoragedevicestads
AT bernardinelliluisa reliabilityoforthodonticminiscrewsbendingandmaximumloadofdifferentti6al4vtitaniumandstainlesssteeltemporaryanchoragedevicestads
AT alcozerroberto reliabilityoforthodonticminiscrewsbendingandmaximumloadofdifferentti6al4vtitaniumandstainlesssteeltemporaryanchoragedevicestads
AT gandinipaola reliabilityoforthodonticminiscrewsbendingandmaximumloadofdifferentti6al4vtitaniumandstainlesssteeltemporaryanchoragedevicestads
AT sfondrinimariafrancesca reliabilityoforthodonticminiscrewsbendingandmaximumloadofdifferentti6al4vtitaniumandstainlesssteeltemporaryanchoragedevicestads