Cargando…

Comparison of 3 Nutritional Questionnaires to Determine Energy Intake Accuracy in Iranian Adults

A precision instrument is required to assess the nutritional status. This study was conducted on comparison of 3 nutritional questionnaires to determine energy intake (EI) accuracy in adults in Ravansar Non-Communicable Chronic Disease (RaNCD) cohort study. This cross-sectional study was conducted o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moradi, Shima, Pasdar, Yahya, Hamzeh, Behrooz, Najafi, Farid, Nachvak, Seyed Mostafa, Mostafai, Roghayeh, Niazi, Parisa, Rezaei, Mansour
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Clinical Nutrition 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079319
http://dx.doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2018.7.3.213
_version_ 1783344132958191616
author Moradi, Shima
Pasdar, Yahya
Hamzeh, Behrooz
Najafi, Farid
Nachvak, Seyed Mostafa
Mostafai, Roghayeh
Niazi, Parisa
Rezaei, Mansour
author_facet Moradi, Shima
Pasdar, Yahya
Hamzeh, Behrooz
Najafi, Farid
Nachvak, Seyed Mostafa
Mostafai, Roghayeh
Niazi, Parisa
Rezaei, Mansour
author_sort Moradi, Shima
collection PubMed
description A precision instrument is required to assess the nutritional status. This study was conducted on comparison of 3 nutritional questionnaires to determine energy intake (EI) accuracy in adults in Ravansar Non-Communicable Chronic Disease (RaNCD) cohort study. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 118 of participant's RaNCD. EI was evaluated with 3 questionnaires including food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), 24-hours recall (24HR), and food habits questionnaire (FHQ). Resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured using indirect calorimetry. We used EI/RMR cut off to evaluate EI reporting status. The mean ± standard deviation of age in men and women were 44.1 ± 6.5 and 43.7 ± 5.25 respectively and 50.8% of participants were men. Among 3 EI estimating questionnaires, FFQ was more accurate than 2 other questionnaires (67.8%). We observed that implausible reporters of 24HR were likely overweight (p < 0.005) but we did not observe a significant difference between EI reporting of FFQ and FHQ with participants' body composition. Our finding showed that EI underreporting of 24HR and FHQ were high. Under reporters were seemed to be overweight. Therefore, these results suggested that among 3 nutritional questionnaires the FFQ was an appropriate approach to determine EI in this population due to plausible EI reporting was higher than 2 other nutritional questionnaires (24HR and FHQ).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6073171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Clinical Nutrition
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60731712018-08-03 Comparison of 3 Nutritional Questionnaires to Determine Energy Intake Accuracy in Iranian Adults Moradi, Shima Pasdar, Yahya Hamzeh, Behrooz Najafi, Farid Nachvak, Seyed Mostafa Mostafai, Roghayeh Niazi, Parisa Rezaei, Mansour Clin Nutr Res Original Article A precision instrument is required to assess the nutritional status. This study was conducted on comparison of 3 nutritional questionnaires to determine energy intake (EI) accuracy in adults in Ravansar Non-Communicable Chronic Disease (RaNCD) cohort study. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 118 of participant's RaNCD. EI was evaluated with 3 questionnaires including food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), 24-hours recall (24HR), and food habits questionnaire (FHQ). Resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured using indirect calorimetry. We used EI/RMR cut off to evaluate EI reporting status. The mean ± standard deviation of age in men and women were 44.1 ± 6.5 and 43.7 ± 5.25 respectively and 50.8% of participants were men. Among 3 EI estimating questionnaires, FFQ was more accurate than 2 other questionnaires (67.8%). We observed that implausible reporters of 24HR were likely overweight (p < 0.005) but we did not observe a significant difference between EI reporting of FFQ and FHQ with participants' body composition. Our finding showed that EI underreporting of 24HR and FHQ were high. Under reporters were seemed to be overweight. Therefore, these results suggested that among 3 nutritional questionnaires the FFQ was an appropriate approach to determine EI in this population due to plausible EI reporting was higher than 2 other nutritional questionnaires (24HR and FHQ). Korean Society of Clinical Nutrition 2018-07 2018-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6073171/ /pubmed/30079319 http://dx.doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2018.7.3.213 Text en Copyright © 2018. The Korean Society of Clinical Nutrition https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moradi, Shima
Pasdar, Yahya
Hamzeh, Behrooz
Najafi, Farid
Nachvak, Seyed Mostafa
Mostafai, Roghayeh
Niazi, Parisa
Rezaei, Mansour
Comparison of 3 Nutritional Questionnaires to Determine Energy Intake Accuracy in Iranian Adults
title Comparison of 3 Nutritional Questionnaires to Determine Energy Intake Accuracy in Iranian Adults
title_full Comparison of 3 Nutritional Questionnaires to Determine Energy Intake Accuracy in Iranian Adults
title_fullStr Comparison of 3 Nutritional Questionnaires to Determine Energy Intake Accuracy in Iranian Adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 3 Nutritional Questionnaires to Determine Energy Intake Accuracy in Iranian Adults
title_short Comparison of 3 Nutritional Questionnaires to Determine Energy Intake Accuracy in Iranian Adults
title_sort comparison of 3 nutritional questionnaires to determine energy intake accuracy in iranian adults
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30079319
http://dx.doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2018.7.3.213
work_keys_str_mv AT moradishima comparisonof3nutritionalquestionnairestodetermineenergyintakeaccuracyiniranianadults
AT pasdaryahya comparisonof3nutritionalquestionnairestodetermineenergyintakeaccuracyiniranianadults
AT hamzehbehrooz comparisonof3nutritionalquestionnairestodetermineenergyintakeaccuracyiniranianadults
AT najafifarid comparisonof3nutritionalquestionnairestodetermineenergyintakeaccuracyiniranianadults
AT nachvakseyedmostafa comparisonof3nutritionalquestionnairestodetermineenergyintakeaccuracyiniranianadults
AT mostafairoghayeh comparisonof3nutritionalquestionnairestodetermineenergyintakeaccuracyiniranianadults
AT niaziparisa comparisonof3nutritionalquestionnairestodetermineenergyintakeaccuracyiniranianadults
AT rezaeimansour comparisonof3nutritionalquestionnairestodetermineenergyintakeaccuracyiniranianadults