Staffing patterns of respiratory therapists in critical care units of Canadian teaching hospitals

BACKGROUND: The optimal level of respiratory therapy staffing in Canadian intensive care units (ICUs) has not been described in the literature. An examination of practice patterns is an essential first step in developing an understanding of the contribution of respiratory therapists (RTs) to both short- and long-term patient outcomes in this context. OBJECTIVE: To identify the ratio of mechanically ventilated patients to respiratory therapist (Vent:RT ratio) in the ICUs of Canadian teaching hospitals and the factors that influence this ratio. METHODS: The present observational study investigated all adult ICUs (n=38) of the primary teaching hospital associated with each Canadian medical school. An electronic survey was administered at three intervals over a period of three months to control for seasonal variation. Data collected included the hours worked by all RTs, the number of mechanically ventilated patients receiving care, ICU characteristics and the practice patterns of the RTs. Data were used to calculate the Vent:RT ratio, and repeated measures ANOVA examined for variation between findings of each of the data collection points. Correlation analyses between key variables were performed and identified associations were further explored using the t test. Approval for the study was granted by the University of Manitoba Research Ethics Board (Winnipeg, Manitoba). RESULTS: A mean (± SD) Vent:RT ratio of 5.1:1±2.818 was determined. Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated no significant differences between findings of the three data collection points (F [1.7,30.5]=0.695; P=0.492). Several variables were associated with a significant difference in the Vent:RT ratio including ICUs where RTs insert arterial monitoring lines (4.05±2.89 versus 6.97±2.85; t[17.6]=−2.64; P=0.02), neurological ICUs (4.04±2.76 versus 6.40±3.35; t[30]=−2.092; P=0.04) and coronary care units (5.72±2.80 versus 3.10±1.88; t[35]=2.72; P=0.01). Significant differences were also identified in the mean number of RT hours worked in ICUs where RTs intubated (31.40±9.71 versus 60.54±47.20; t(13)=−2.17; P=0.049) and procured arterial blood gases (41.68±30.85 versus 77.33±46.22; t[35]=−2.79; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first to report the Vent:RT ratio and RT practice patterns in Canadian adult ICUs. The results serve as a baseline for comparison of staffing norms and will enlighten future research on the impact of RT staffing and practice patterns on patient outcomes.