Cargando…

Is the Kidney Donor Risk Index a Useful Tool in Non-US Patients?

BACKGROUND: Deceased donor kidney allocation in the United States is guided by the Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI). The generalizability of the KDRI beyond the United States has not been widely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the generalizability of the KDRI in a cohort of non-US (Canadian) deceased do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Ann, Knoll, Greg A., McArthur, Eric, Dixon, Stephanie N., Garg, Amit X., Lok, Charmaine E., Lam, Ngan N., Kim, S. Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358118791148
_version_ 1783344275297140736
author Young, Ann
Knoll, Greg A.
McArthur, Eric
Dixon, Stephanie N.
Garg, Amit X.
Lok, Charmaine E.
Lam, Ngan N.
Kim, S. Joseph
author_facet Young, Ann
Knoll, Greg A.
McArthur, Eric
Dixon, Stephanie N.
Garg, Amit X.
Lok, Charmaine E.
Lam, Ngan N.
Kim, S. Joseph
author_sort Young, Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deceased donor kidney allocation in the United States is guided by the Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI). The generalizability of the KDRI beyond the United States has not been widely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the generalizability of the KDRI in a cohort of non-US (Canadian) deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: Recipients of deceased donor kidneys from January 1, 2005, to March 31, 2011. METHODS: Using administrative data, we analyzed a cohort of deceased donor kidney recipients in Ontario, Canada. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relationship between KDRI and the outcomes of graft loss and death. KDRI was modeled continuously and categorically. The ability of models with KDRI to predict recipient outcomes beyond donor age was also explored. Model discrimination was assessed using c-statistics, evaluated at 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1299 consecutive deceased donor kidney transplant recipients were included. The median follow-up was 5.5 years. Mean donor age increased from 27 to 64 years across ascending KDRI quintiles. The adjusted relative hazards (95% confidence interval) for total graft loss from Q2 to Q5 (referent = Q1) were 1.27 (0.89-1.80), 1.58 (1.13-2.22), 1.43 (1.01-2.02), and 2.15 (1.54-2.99), respectively. Increased relative hazards across KDRI quintiles were also observed for death-censored graft loss, but not death with graft function. All-cause mortality was increased for the highest KDRI quintile only. In this cohort, a model with KDRI performed better than a model with donor age alone (P = .009). LIMITATIONS: Large health care databases may have precluded the complete capture of covariate data. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the KDRI is generalizable to Canadian patients in Ontario and may help inform risk assessment beyond donor age. The performance of KDRI in other non-US settings, and the need for additional model refinement, warrants further study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6073818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60738182018-08-06 Is the Kidney Donor Risk Index a Useful Tool in Non-US Patients? Young, Ann Knoll, Greg A. McArthur, Eric Dixon, Stephanie N. Garg, Amit X. Lok, Charmaine E. Lam, Ngan N. Kim, S. Joseph Can J Kidney Health Dis Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Deceased donor kidney allocation in the United States is guided by the Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI). The generalizability of the KDRI beyond the United States has not been widely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the generalizability of the KDRI in a cohort of non-US (Canadian) deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: Recipients of deceased donor kidneys from January 1, 2005, to March 31, 2011. METHODS: Using administrative data, we analyzed a cohort of deceased donor kidney recipients in Ontario, Canada. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relationship between KDRI and the outcomes of graft loss and death. KDRI was modeled continuously and categorically. The ability of models with KDRI to predict recipient outcomes beyond donor age was also explored. Model discrimination was assessed using c-statistics, evaluated at 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1299 consecutive deceased donor kidney transplant recipients were included. The median follow-up was 5.5 years. Mean donor age increased from 27 to 64 years across ascending KDRI quintiles. The adjusted relative hazards (95% confidence interval) for total graft loss from Q2 to Q5 (referent = Q1) were 1.27 (0.89-1.80), 1.58 (1.13-2.22), 1.43 (1.01-2.02), and 2.15 (1.54-2.99), respectively. Increased relative hazards across KDRI quintiles were also observed for death-censored graft loss, but not death with graft function. All-cause mortality was increased for the highest KDRI quintile only. In this cohort, a model with KDRI performed better than a model with donor age alone (P = .009). LIMITATIONS: Large health care databases may have precluded the complete capture of covariate data. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the KDRI is generalizable to Canadian patients in Ontario and may help inform risk assessment beyond donor age. The performance of KDRI in other non-US settings, and the need for additional model refinement, warrants further study. SAGE Publications 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6073818/ /pubmed/30083367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358118791148 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Young, Ann
Knoll, Greg A.
McArthur, Eric
Dixon, Stephanie N.
Garg, Amit X.
Lok, Charmaine E.
Lam, Ngan N.
Kim, S. Joseph
Is the Kidney Donor Risk Index a Useful Tool in Non-US Patients?
title Is the Kidney Donor Risk Index a Useful Tool in Non-US Patients?
title_full Is the Kidney Donor Risk Index a Useful Tool in Non-US Patients?
title_fullStr Is the Kidney Donor Risk Index a Useful Tool in Non-US Patients?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Kidney Donor Risk Index a Useful Tool in Non-US Patients?
title_short Is the Kidney Donor Risk Index a Useful Tool in Non-US Patients?
title_sort is the kidney donor risk index a useful tool in non-us patients?
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30083367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2054358118791148
work_keys_str_mv AT youngann isthekidneydonorriskindexausefultoolinnonuspatients
AT knollgrega isthekidneydonorriskindexausefultoolinnonuspatients
AT mcarthureric isthekidneydonorriskindexausefultoolinnonuspatients
AT dixonstephanien isthekidneydonorriskindexausefultoolinnonuspatients
AT gargamitx isthekidneydonorriskindexausefultoolinnonuspatients
AT lokcharmainee isthekidneydonorriskindexausefultoolinnonuspatients
AT lamngann isthekidneydonorriskindexausefultoolinnonuspatients
AT kimsjoseph isthekidneydonorriskindexausefultoolinnonuspatients