Cargando…

In Vitro Transcriptome Response to a Mixture of Lactobacilli Strains in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cell Line

Background: Food and feed supplements containing microorganisms with probiotic potential are of increasing interest due to their healthy promoting effect on human and animals. Their mechanism of action is still unknown. Using a microarray approach, the aim of this study was to investigate the differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taranu, Ionelia, Marin, Daniela Eliza, Braicu, Cornelia, Pistol, Gina Cecilia, Sorescu, Ionut, Pruteanu, Lavinia Lorena, Berindan Neagoe, Ioana, Vodnar, Dan Cristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29966337
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071923
_version_ 1783344282535460864
author Taranu, Ionelia
Marin, Daniela Eliza
Braicu, Cornelia
Pistol, Gina Cecilia
Sorescu, Ionut
Pruteanu, Lavinia Lorena
Berindan Neagoe, Ioana
Vodnar, Dan Cristian
author_facet Taranu, Ionelia
Marin, Daniela Eliza
Braicu, Cornelia
Pistol, Gina Cecilia
Sorescu, Ionut
Pruteanu, Lavinia Lorena
Berindan Neagoe, Ioana
Vodnar, Dan Cristian
author_sort Taranu, Ionelia
collection PubMed
description Background: Food and feed supplements containing microorganisms with probiotic potential are of increasing interest due to their healthy promoting effect on human and animals. Their mechanism of action is still unknown. Using a microarray approach, the aim of this study was to investigate the differences in genome-wide gene expression induced by a mixture of three Lactobacillus strains (L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, and L. paracasei) in intestinal porcine epithelial cells (IPEC-1) and to identify the genes and pathways involved in intestinal barrier functions. Methods: Undifferentiated IPEC-1 cells seeded at a density of 2.0 × 10(5)/mL in 24-wells culture plates were cultivated at 37 °C and 5% CO(2) until they reached confluence (2–3 days). Confluent cells monolayer were then cultivated with 1 mL of fresh lactobacilli (LB) mixture suspension prepared for a concentration of approximately 3.3 × 10(7) CFU/mL for each strain (1 × 10(8) CFU/mL in total) for 3 h and analyzed by microarray using Gene Spring GX v.11.5. Results: The functional analysis showed that 1811 of the genes modulated by LB treatment are involved in signaling (95% up-regulation, 121 genes with a fold change higher than 10). The most enhanced expression was registered for AXIN2 (axis inhibition protein 2-AXIN2) gene (13.93 Fc, p = 0.043), a negative regulator of β-catenin with a key role in human cancer. LB affected the cellular proliferation by increasing 10 times (Fc) the NF1 gene encoding for the neurofibromin protein, a tumor suppressor that prevent cells from uncontrolled proliferation. The induction of genes like serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A member 3 (SERPINA 3), interleukin-20 (IL-20), oncostatin M (OSM), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and the suppression of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2/macrophage inflammatory protein 2-alpha (CXCL-2/MIP-2), regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2), and of pro-inflammatory interleukin-18 (IL-18) genes highlights the protective role of lactobacilli in epithelial barrier function against inflammation and in the activation of immune response. Conclusion: Gene overexpression was the predominant effect produced by lactobacilli treatment in IPEC-1 cells, genes related to signaling pathways being the most affected. The protective role of lactobacilli in epithelial barrier function against inflammation and in the activation of immune response was also noticed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6073849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60738492018-08-13 In Vitro Transcriptome Response to a Mixture of Lactobacilli Strains in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cell Line Taranu, Ionelia Marin, Daniela Eliza Braicu, Cornelia Pistol, Gina Cecilia Sorescu, Ionut Pruteanu, Lavinia Lorena Berindan Neagoe, Ioana Vodnar, Dan Cristian Int J Mol Sci Article Background: Food and feed supplements containing microorganisms with probiotic potential are of increasing interest due to their healthy promoting effect on human and animals. Their mechanism of action is still unknown. Using a microarray approach, the aim of this study was to investigate the differences in genome-wide gene expression induced by a mixture of three Lactobacillus strains (L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, and L. paracasei) in intestinal porcine epithelial cells (IPEC-1) and to identify the genes and pathways involved in intestinal barrier functions. Methods: Undifferentiated IPEC-1 cells seeded at a density of 2.0 × 10(5)/mL in 24-wells culture plates were cultivated at 37 °C and 5% CO(2) until they reached confluence (2–3 days). Confluent cells monolayer were then cultivated with 1 mL of fresh lactobacilli (LB) mixture suspension prepared for a concentration of approximately 3.3 × 10(7) CFU/mL for each strain (1 × 10(8) CFU/mL in total) for 3 h and analyzed by microarray using Gene Spring GX v.11.5. Results: The functional analysis showed that 1811 of the genes modulated by LB treatment are involved in signaling (95% up-regulation, 121 genes with a fold change higher than 10). The most enhanced expression was registered for AXIN2 (axis inhibition protein 2-AXIN2) gene (13.93 Fc, p = 0.043), a negative regulator of β-catenin with a key role in human cancer. LB affected the cellular proliferation by increasing 10 times (Fc) the NF1 gene encoding for the neurofibromin protein, a tumor suppressor that prevent cells from uncontrolled proliferation. The induction of genes like serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A member 3 (SERPINA 3), interleukin-20 (IL-20), oncostatin M (OSM), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and the suppression of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2/macrophage inflammatory protein 2-alpha (CXCL-2/MIP-2), regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2), and of pro-inflammatory interleukin-18 (IL-18) genes highlights the protective role of lactobacilli in epithelial barrier function against inflammation and in the activation of immune response. Conclusion: Gene overexpression was the predominant effect produced by lactobacilli treatment in IPEC-1 cells, genes related to signaling pathways being the most affected. The protective role of lactobacilli in epithelial barrier function against inflammation and in the activation of immune response was also noticed. MDPI 2018-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6073849/ /pubmed/29966337 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071923 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Taranu, Ionelia
Marin, Daniela Eliza
Braicu, Cornelia
Pistol, Gina Cecilia
Sorescu, Ionut
Pruteanu, Lavinia Lorena
Berindan Neagoe, Ioana
Vodnar, Dan Cristian
In Vitro Transcriptome Response to a Mixture of Lactobacilli Strains in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cell Line
title In Vitro Transcriptome Response to a Mixture of Lactobacilli Strains in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cell Line
title_full In Vitro Transcriptome Response to a Mixture of Lactobacilli Strains in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cell Line
title_fullStr In Vitro Transcriptome Response to a Mixture of Lactobacilli Strains in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cell Line
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Transcriptome Response to a Mixture of Lactobacilli Strains in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cell Line
title_short In Vitro Transcriptome Response to a Mixture of Lactobacilli Strains in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cell Line
title_sort in vitro transcriptome response to a mixture of lactobacilli strains in intestinal porcine epithelial cell line
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29966337
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071923
work_keys_str_mv AT taranuionelia invitrotranscriptomeresponsetoamixtureoflactobacillistrainsinintestinalporcineepithelialcellline
AT marindanielaeliza invitrotranscriptomeresponsetoamixtureoflactobacillistrainsinintestinalporcineepithelialcellline
AT braicucornelia invitrotranscriptomeresponsetoamixtureoflactobacillistrainsinintestinalporcineepithelialcellline
AT pistolginacecilia invitrotranscriptomeresponsetoamixtureoflactobacillistrainsinintestinalporcineepithelialcellline
AT sorescuionut invitrotranscriptomeresponsetoamixtureoflactobacillistrainsinintestinalporcineepithelialcellline
AT pruteanulavinialorena invitrotranscriptomeresponsetoamixtureoflactobacillistrainsinintestinalporcineepithelialcellline
AT berindanneagoeioana invitrotranscriptomeresponsetoamixtureoflactobacillistrainsinintestinalporcineepithelialcellline
AT vodnardancristian invitrotranscriptomeresponsetoamixtureoflactobacillistrainsinintestinalporcineepithelialcellline