Cargando…

The effect of low-level laser 810 nm and light-emitting diode photobiomodulation (626 nm) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory markers interleukin-1 beta and prostaglandin E2, around implants

BACKGROUND: One of the most common problems in edentulous patients is the low stability of lower dentures. The most effective method to overcome this problem is implant-supported overdentures. After placing an implant, for the process of osseointegration to be complete and successful, it is better t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Memarian, Jafar, Ketabi, Mohammad, Amini, Shahram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123306
_version_ 1783344305116545024
author Memarian, Jafar
Ketabi, Mohammad
Amini, Shahram
author_facet Memarian, Jafar
Ketabi, Mohammad
Amini, Shahram
author_sort Memarian, Jafar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the most common problems in edentulous patients is the low stability of lower dentures. The most effective method to overcome this problem is implant-supported overdentures. After placing an implant, for the process of osseointegration to be complete and successful, it is better that patients do not use their denture for few months. This may be nonconvenient for patient because they are unable to speak and eat properly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low level laser (LLL) and light-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation on implant stability as well as their effect on interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) biomarkers around implant in lower anterior region (over denture). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this clinical trial, 36 implants were placed in fully edentulous mandibles (12 people per person - three implants in areas of midline and canine). Each of the implants was randomly placed in one of three groups of laser, LED, and control. LLL (power of 50 mw and the amount of 20 J/cm(2) for each implant) and LED with dose (20 mw/cm(2)) were irradiated on the day of surgery (zero), 3, 7, 10, and 14 days. The stability of implants was measured on the day of surgery and weeks 3, 4, and 8 after surgery with Periotest. The inflammatory biomarkers of IL-1β and PGE2 were also collected from gingival crevicular fluid around implants in 4 and 8 weeks. The collected data were analyzed by ANOVA statistical tests.pvalue<0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: The amounts of Periotest significantly increased 3(rd) week after surgery in the control group (P < 0.001). However, the laser group and LED group were associated with minimal changes, which indicates lower stability of implant in 3(rd) week in control group but no changes in stability of test groups (laser and LED). Laser and LED had no effect on the level of IL-1β and PGE2 in 4 and 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: The use of LLL or LED has a positive effect on the stability of the implants 3 weeks after surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6073945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60739452018-08-17 The effect of low-level laser 810 nm and light-emitting diode photobiomodulation (626 nm) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory markers interleukin-1 beta and prostaglandin E2, around implants Memarian, Jafar Ketabi, Mohammad Amini, Shahram Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: One of the most common problems in edentulous patients is the low stability of lower dentures. The most effective method to overcome this problem is implant-supported overdentures. After placing an implant, for the process of osseointegration to be complete and successful, it is better that patients do not use their denture for few months. This may be nonconvenient for patient because they are unable to speak and eat properly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low level laser (LLL) and light-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation on implant stability as well as their effect on interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) biomarkers around implant in lower anterior region (over denture). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this clinical trial, 36 implants were placed in fully edentulous mandibles (12 people per person - three implants in areas of midline and canine). Each of the implants was randomly placed in one of three groups of laser, LED, and control. LLL (power of 50 mw and the amount of 20 J/cm(2) for each implant) and LED with dose (20 mw/cm(2)) were irradiated on the day of surgery (zero), 3, 7, 10, and 14 days. The stability of implants was measured on the day of surgery and weeks 3, 4, and 8 after surgery with Periotest. The inflammatory biomarkers of IL-1β and PGE2 were also collected from gingival crevicular fluid around implants in 4 and 8 weeks. The collected data were analyzed by ANOVA statistical tests.pvalue<0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: The amounts of Periotest significantly increased 3(rd) week after surgery in the control group (P < 0.001). However, the laser group and LED group were associated with minimal changes, which indicates lower stability of implant in 3(rd) week in control group but no changes in stability of test groups (laser and LED). Laser and LED had no effect on the level of IL-1β and PGE2 in 4 and 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: The use of LLL or LED has a positive effect on the stability of the implants 3 weeks after surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6073945/ /pubmed/30123306 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Memarian, Jafar
Ketabi, Mohammad
Amini, Shahram
The effect of low-level laser 810 nm and light-emitting diode photobiomodulation (626 nm) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory markers interleukin-1 beta and prostaglandin E2, around implants
title The effect of low-level laser 810 nm and light-emitting diode photobiomodulation (626 nm) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory markers interleukin-1 beta and prostaglandin E2, around implants
title_full The effect of low-level laser 810 nm and light-emitting diode photobiomodulation (626 nm) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory markers interleukin-1 beta and prostaglandin E2, around implants
title_fullStr The effect of low-level laser 810 nm and light-emitting diode photobiomodulation (626 nm) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory markers interleukin-1 beta and prostaglandin E2, around implants
title_full_unstemmed The effect of low-level laser 810 nm and light-emitting diode photobiomodulation (626 nm) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory markers interleukin-1 beta and prostaglandin E2, around implants
title_short The effect of low-level laser 810 nm and light-emitting diode photobiomodulation (626 nm) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory markers interleukin-1 beta and prostaglandin E2, around implants
title_sort effect of low-level laser 810 nm and light-emitting diode photobiomodulation (626 nm) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory markers interleukin-1 beta and prostaglandin e2, around implants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123306
work_keys_str_mv AT memarianjafar theeffectoflowlevellaser810nmandlightemittingdiodephotobiomodulation626nmonthestabilityoftheimplantandinflammatorymarkersinterleukin1betaandprostaglandine2aroundimplants
AT ketabimohammad theeffectoflowlevellaser810nmandlightemittingdiodephotobiomodulation626nmonthestabilityoftheimplantandinflammatorymarkersinterleukin1betaandprostaglandine2aroundimplants
AT aminishahram theeffectoflowlevellaser810nmandlightemittingdiodephotobiomodulation626nmonthestabilityoftheimplantandinflammatorymarkersinterleukin1betaandprostaglandine2aroundimplants
AT memarianjafar effectoflowlevellaser810nmandlightemittingdiodephotobiomodulation626nmonthestabilityoftheimplantandinflammatorymarkersinterleukin1betaandprostaglandine2aroundimplants
AT ketabimohammad effectoflowlevellaser810nmandlightemittingdiodephotobiomodulation626nmonthestabilityoftheimplantandinflammatorymarkersinterleukin1betaandprostaglandine2aroundimplants
AT aminishahram effectoflowlevellaser810nmandlightemittingdiodephotobiomodulation626nmonthestabilityoftheimplantandinflammatorymarkersinterleukin1betaandprostaglandine2aroundimplants