Cargando…

Comparison of surface roughness of enamel and shear bond strength, between conventional acid etching and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet laser etching – An in vitro study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate and to compare the shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index, and surface roughness of the samples bonded after etching with phosphoric acid and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser. MATERIALS AND ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dilip, S., Srinivas, S., Mohammed Noufal, M. N., Ravi, K., Krishnaraj, R., Charles, Anila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123301
_version_ 1783344305822236672
author Dilip, S.
Srinivas, S.
Mohammed Noufal, M. N.
Ravi, K.
Krishnaraj, R.
Charles, Anila
author_facet Dilip, S.
Srinivas, S.
Mohammed Noufal, M. N.
Ravi, K.
Krishnaraj, R.
Charles, Anila
author_sort Dilip, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate and to compare the shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index, and surface roughness of the samples bonded after etching with phosphoric acid and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present analytical/descriptive study, 90 premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were used, out of which 75 were randomly divided into five groups where five different methods were used to prepare the enamel for bonding; etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s, irradiation with Er, Cr: YSGG laser at 1 watt for 10 s and 20 s, and irradiation with Er, Cr: YSGG laser at 1.5 watt for 10 s and 20 s. Following this, metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT. Brackets were debonded 24 h, later and SBS were measured, and adhesive remnant index scores were measured. The remaining 15 teeth were used for surface evaluation of these five groups using three-dimensional optical profiler. The results of the SBS testing, adhesive remnant index) scores, and surface roughness values were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference tests with a significant level at 0.05. RESULTS: The difference in bond strength between the laser (1.5 W/20 s) and conventional acid etching was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). For acid etch tech, it was 10.48 Mpa and Laser etch at 1.5 W/20 s 10.46 Mpa bond strength attained by the other groups (1 W/10 Hz, 1 W/20 Hz, and 1.5 W/10 Hz) was significantly less than acid etched, and laser etched (1.5 W/20 Hz) groups with P > 0.05. The surface roughness was found to be similar between the laser- (1.5 W/20 s) and acid-etched groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Irradiation with 1.5 W/20 s Er, Cr: YSGG laser produced bond strength comparable to acid etching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6073948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60739482018-08-17 Comparison of surface roughness of enamel and shear bond strength, between conventional acid etching and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet laser etching – An in vitro study Dilip, S. Srinivas, S. Mohammed Noufal, M. N. Ravi, K. Krishnaraj, R. Charles, Anila Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate and to compare the shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index, and surface roughness of the samples bonded after etching with phosphoric acid and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present analytical/descriptive study, 90 premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were used, out of which 75 were randomly divided into five groups where five different methods were used to prepare the enamel for bonding; etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s, irradiation with Er, Cr: YSGG laser at 1 watt for 10 s and 20 s, and irradiation with Er, Cr: YSGG laser at 1.5 watt for 10 s and 20 s. Following this, metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT. Brackets were debonded 24 h, later and SBS were measured, and adhesive remnant index scores were measured. The remaining 15 teeth were used for surface evaluation of these five groups using three-dimensional optical profiler. The results of the SBS testing, adhesive remnant index) scores, and surface roughness values were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference tests with a significant level at 0.05. RESULTS: The difference in bond strength between the laser (1.5 W/20 s) and conventional acid etching was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). For acid etch tech, it was 10.48 Mpa and Laser etch at 1.5 W/20 s 10.46 Mpa bond strength attained by the other groups (1 W/10 Hz, 1 W/20 Hz, and 1.5 W/10 Hz) was significantly less than acid etched, and laser etched (1.5 W/20 Hz) groups with P > 0.05. The surface roughness was found to be similar between the laser- (1.5 W/20 s) and acid-etched groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Irradiation with 1.5 W/20 s Er, Cr: YSGG laser produced bond strength comparable to acid etching. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6073948/ /pubmed/30123301 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dilip, S.
Srinivas, S.
Mohammed Noufal, M. N.
Ravi, K.
Krishnaraj, R.
Charles, Anila
Comparison of surface roughness of enamel and shear bond strength, between conventional acid etching and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet laser etching – An in vitro study
title Comparison of surface roughness of enamel and shear bond strength, between conventional acid etching and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet laser etching – An in vitro study
title_full Comparison of surface roughness of enamel and shear bond strength, between conventional acid etching and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet laser etching – An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of surface roughness of enamel and shear bond strength, between conventional acid etching and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet laser etching – An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of surface roughness of enamel and shear bond strength, between conventional acid etching and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet laser etching – An in vitro study
title_short Comparison of surface roughness of enamel and shear bond strength, between conventional acid etching and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet laser etching – An in vitro study
title_sort comparison of surface roughness of enamel and shear bond strength, between conventional acid etching and erbium, chromium-doped: yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet laser etching – an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123301
work_keys_str_mv AT dilips comparisonofsurfaceroughnessofenamelandshearbondstrengthbetweenconventionalacidetchinganderbiumchromiumdopedyttriumscandiumgalliumgarnetlaseretchinganinvitrostudy
AT srinivass comparisonofsurfaceroughnessofenamelandshearbondstrengthbetweenconventionalacidetchinganderbiumchromiumdopedyttriumscandiumgalliumgarnetlaseretchinganinvitrostudy
AT mohammednoufalmn comparisonofsurfaceroughnessofenamelandshearbondstrengthbetweenconventionalacidetchinganderbiumchromiumdopedyttriumscandiumgalliumgarnetlaseretchinganinvitrostudy
AT ravik comparisonofsurfaceroughnessofenamelandshearbondstrengthbetweenconventionalacidetchinganderbiumchromiumdopedyttriumscandiumgalliumgarnetlaseretchinganinvitrostudy
AT krishnarajr comparisonofsurfaceroughnessofenamelandshearbondstrengthbetweenconventionalacidetchinganderbiumchromiumdopedyttriumscandiumgalliumgarnetlaseretchinganinvitrostudy
AT charlesanila comparisonofsurfaceroughnessofenamelandshearbondstrengthbetweenconventionalacidetchinganderbiumchromiumdopedyttriumscandiumgalliumgarnetlaseretchinganinvitrostudy