Cargando…

Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma?

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicities after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with two different dose regimens for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) ≤3 cm in size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Kyung Hwa, Yu, Jeong Il, Park, Hee Chul, Park, Su Yeon, Shin, Jung Suk, Shin, Eun Hyuk, Cho, Sungkoo, Jung, Sang Hoon, Han, Young Yih, Lim, Do Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983033
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00598
_version_ 1783344327548731392
author Lee, Kyung Hwa
Yu, Jeong Il
Park, Hee Chul
Park, Su Yeon
Shin, Jung Suk
Shin, Eun Hyuk
Cho, Sungkoo
Jung, Sang Hoon
Han, Young Yih
Lim, Do Hoon
author_facet Lee, Kyung Hwa
Yu, Jeong Il
Park, Hee Chul
Park, Su Yeon
Shin, Jung Suk
Shin, Eun Hyuk
Cho, Sungkoo
Jung, Sang Hoon
Han, Young Yih
Lim, Do Hoon
author_sort Lee, Kyung Hwa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicities after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with two different dose regimens for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) ≤3 cm in size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients with liver-confined HCC treated between 2009 and 2014 with SBRT. Total doses of 45 Gy (n = 10) or 60 Gy (n = 34) in 3 fractions were prescribed to the 95% isodose line covering 95% of the planning target volume. Rates of local control (LC), intrahepatic failure-free survival (IHFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29 months (range, 8 to 64 months). Rates at 1 and 3 years were 97.7% and 95.0% for LC, 97.7% and 80.7% for OS, 76% and 40.5% for IHFFS, and 87.3% and 79.5% for DMFS. Five patients (11.4%) experienced degradation of albumin-bilirubin grade, 2 (4.5%) degradation of Child-Pugh score, and 4 (9.1%) grade 3 or greater laboratory abnormalities within 3 months after SBRT. No significant difference was seen in any oncological outcomes or treatment-related toxicities between the two dose regimens. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT was highly effective for local control without severe toxicities in patients with HCC smaller than 3 cm. The regimen of a total dose of 45 Gy in 3 fractions was comparable to 60 Gy in efficacy and safety of SBRT for small HCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6074068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60740682018-08-23 Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma? Lee, Kyung Hwa Yu, Jeong Il Park, Hee Chul Park, Su Yeon Shin, Jung Suk Shin, Eun Hyuk Cho, Sungkoo Jung, Sang Hoon Han, Young Yih Lim, Do Hoon Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicities after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with two different dose regimens for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) ≤3 cm in size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients with liver-confined HCC treated between 2009 and 2014 with SBRT. Total doses of 45 Gy (n = 10) or 60 Gy (n = 34) in 3 fractions were prescribed to the 95% isodose line covering 95% of the planning target volume. Rates of local control (LC), intrahepatic failure-free survival (IHFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29 months (range, 8 to 64 months). Rates at 1 and 3 years were 97.7% and 95.0% for LC, 97.7% and 80.7% for OS, 76% and 40.5% for IHFFS, and 87.3% and 79.5% for DMFS. Five patients (11.4%) experienced degradation of albumin-bilirubin grade, 2 (4.5%) degradation of Child-Pugh score, and 4 (9.1%) grade 3 or greater laboratory abnormalities within 3 months after SBRT. No significant difference was seen in any oncological outcomes or treatment-related toxicities between the two dose regimens. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT was highly effective for local control without severe toxicities in patients with HCC smaller than 3 cm. The regimen of a total dose of 45 Gy in 3 fractions was comparable to 60 Gy in efficacy and safety of SBRT for small HCC. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018-06 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6074068/ /pubmed/29983033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00598 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Kyung Hwa
Yu, Jeong Il
Park, Hee Chul
Park, Su Yeon
Shin, Jung Suk
Shin, Eun Hyuk
Cho, Sungkoo
Jung, Sang Hoon
Han, Young Yih
Lim, Do Hoon
Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma?
title Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma?
title_full Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma?
title_fullStr Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma?
title_full_unstemmed Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma?
title_short Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma?
title_sort is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983033
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00598
work_keys_str_mv AT leekyunghwa ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT yujeongil ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT parkheechul ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT parksuyeon ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT shinjungsuk ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT shineunhyuk ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chosungkoo ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT jungsanghoon ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hanyoungyih ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT limdohoon ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma