Cargando…
Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma?
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicities after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with two different dose regimens for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) ≤3 cm in size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00598 |
_version_ | 1783344327548731392 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Kyung Hwa Yu, Jeong Il Park, Hee Chul Park, Su Yeon Shin, Jung Suk Shin, Eun Hyuk Cho, Sungkoo Jung, Sang Hoon Han, Young Yih Lim, Do Hoon |
author_facet | Lee, Kyung Hwa Yu, Jeong Il Park, Hee Chul Park, Su Yeon Shin, Jung Suk Shin, Eun Hyuk Cho, Sungkoo Jung, Sang Hoon Han, Young Yih Lim, Do Hoon |
author_sort | Lee, Kyung Hwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicities after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with two different dose regimens for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) ≤3 cm in size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients with liver-confined HCC treated between 2009 and 2014 with SBRT. Total doses of 45 Gy (n = 10) or 60 Gy (n = 34) in 3 fractions were prescribed to the 95% isodose line covering 95% of the planning target volume. Rates of local control (LC), intrahepatic failure-free survival (IHFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29 months (range, 8 to 64 months). Rates at 1 and 3 years were 97.7% and 95.0% for LC, 97.7% and 80.7% for OS, 76% and 40.5% for IHFFS, and 87.3% and 79.5% for DMFS. Five patients (11.4%) experienced degradation of albumin-bilirubin grade, 2 (4.5%) degradation of Child-Pugh score, and 4 (9.1%) grade 3 or greater laboratory abnormalities within 3 months after SBRT. No significant difference was seen in any oncological outcomes or treatment-related toxicities between the two dose regimens. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT was highly effective for local control without severe toxicities in patients with HCC smaller than 3 cm. The regimen of a total dose of 45 Gy in 3 fractions was comparable to 60 Gy in efficacy and safety of SBRT for small HCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6074068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60740682018-08-23 Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma? Lee, Kyung Hwa Yu, Jeong Il Park, Hee Chul Park, Su Yeon Shin, Jung Suk Shin, Eun Hyuk Cho, Sungkoo Jung, Sang Hoon Han, Young Yih Lim, Do Hoon Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicities after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with two different dose regimens for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) ≤3 cm in size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients with liver-confined HCC treated between 2009 and 2014 with SBRT. Total doses of 45 Gy (n = 10) or 60 Gy (n = 34) in 3 fractions were prescribed to the 95% isodose line covering 95% of the planning target volume. Rates of local control (LC), intrahepatic failure-free survival (IHFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29 months (range, 8 to 64 months). Rates at 1 and 3 years were 97.7% and 95.0% for LC, 97.7% and 80.7% for OS, 76% and 40.5% for IHFFS, and 87.3% and 79.5% for DMFS. Five patients (11.4%) experienced degradation of albumin-bilirubin grade, 2 (4.5%) degradation of Child-Pugh score, and 4 (9.1%) grade 3 or greater laboratory abnormalities within 3 months after SBRT. No significant difference was seen in any oncological outcomes or treatment-related toxicities between the two dose regimens. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT was highly effective for local control without severe toxicities in patients with HCC smaller than 3 cm. The regimen of a total dose of 45 Gy in 3 fractions was comparable to 60 Gy in efficacy and safety of SBRT for small HCC. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018-06 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6074068/ /pubmed/29983033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00598 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Kyung Hwa Yu, Jeong Il Park, Hee Chul Park, Su Yeon Shin, Jung Suk Shin, Eun Hyuk Cho, Sungkoo Jung, Sang Hoon Han, Young Yih Lim, Do Hoon Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma? |
title | Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma? |
title_full | Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma? |
title_fullStr | Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma? |
title_short | Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma? |
title_sort | is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00598 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekyunghwa ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT yujeongil ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT parkheechul ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT parksuyeon ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT shinjungsuk ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT shineunhyuk ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT chosungkoo ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT jungsanghoon ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT hanyoungyih ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma AT limdohoon ishigherdosealwaystherightanswerinstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforsmallhepatocellularcarcinoma |