Cargando…

External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence

PURPOSE: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram is web-based nomogram that predicts ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). We aimed to validate the IBTR! 2.0 using an external data set. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 2,206 patients, who received breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Byung Min, Chang, Jee Suk, Cho, Young Up, Park, Seho, Park, Hyung Seok, Kim, Jee Ye, Sohn, Joo Hyuk, Kim, Gun Min, Koo, Ja Seung, Keum, Ki Chang, Suh, Chang-Ok, Kim, Yong Bae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00059
_version_ 1783344328961163264
author Lee, Byung Min
Chang, Jee Suk
Cho, Young Up
Park, Seho
Park, Hyung Seok
Kim, Jee Ye
Sohn, Joo Hyuk
Kim, Gun Min
Koo, Ja Seung
Keum, Ki Chang
Suh, Chang-Ok
Kim, Yong Bae
author_facet Lee, Byung Min
Chang, Jee Suk
Cho, Young Up
Park, Seho
Park, Hyung Seok
Kim, Jee Ye
Sohn, Joo Hyuk
Kim, Gun Min
Koo, Ja Seung
Keum, Ki Chang
Suh, Chang-Ok
Kim, Yong Bae
author_sort Lee, Byung Min
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram is web-based nomogram that predicts ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). We aimed to validate the IBTR! 2.0 using an external data set. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 2,206 patients, who received breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy from 1992 to 2012 at our institution, where wide surgical excision is been routinely performed. Discrimination and calibration were used for assessing model performance. Patients with predicted 10-year IBTR risk based on an IBTR! 2.0 nomogram score of <3%, 3%–5%, 5%–10%, and >10% were assigned to groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. We also plotted calibration values to observe the actual IBTR rate against the nomogram-derived 10-year IBTR probabilities. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 73 months (range, 6 to 277 months). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.607, showing poor accordance between the estimated and observed recurrence rate. Calibration plot confirmed that the IBTR! 2.0 nomogram predicted the 10-year IBTR risk higher than the observed IBTR rates in all groups. High discrepancies between nomogram IBTR predictions and observed IBTR rates were observed in overall risk groups. Compared with the original development dataset, our patients had fewer high grade tumors, less margin positivity, and less lymphovascular invasion, and more use of modern systemic therapies. CONCLUSIONS: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram seems to have the moderate discriminative ability with a tendency to over-estimating risk rate. Continued efforts are needed to ensure external applicability of published nomograms by validating the program using an external patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6074074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60740742018-08-23 External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence Lee, Byung Min Chang, Jee Suk Cho, Young Up Park, Seho Park, Hyung Seok Kim, Jee Ye Sohn, Joo Hyuk Kim, Gun Min Koo, Ja Seung Keum, Ki Chang Suh, Chang-Ok Kim, Yong Bae Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram is web-based nomogram that predicts ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). We aimed to validate the IBTR! 2.0 using an external data set. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 2,206 patients, who received breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy from 1992 to 2012 at our institution, where wide surgical excision is been routinely performed. Discrimination and calibration were used for assessing model performance. Patients with predicted 10-year IBTR risk based on an IBTR! 2.0 nomogram score of <3%, 3%–5%, 5%–10%, and >10% were assigned to groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. We also plotted calibration values to observe the actual IBTR rate against the nomogram-derived 10-year IBTR probabilities. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 73 months (range, 6 to 277 months). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.607, showing poor accordance between the estimated and observed recurrence rate. Calibration plot confirmed that the IBTR! 2.0 nomogram predicted the 10-year IBTR risk higher than the observed IBTR rates in all groups. High discrepancies between nomogram IBTR predictions and observed IBTR rates were observed in overall risk groups. Compared with the original development dataset, our patients had fewer high grade tumors, less margin positivity, and less lymphovascular invasion, and more use of modern systemic therapies. CONCLUSIONS: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram seems to have the moderate discriminative ability with a tendency to over-estimating risk rate. Continued efforts are needed to ensure external applicability of published nomograms by validating the program using an external patient population. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018-06 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6074074/ /pubmed/29983034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00059 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Byung Min
Chang, Jee Suk
Cho, Young Up
Park, Seho
Park, Hyung Seok
Kim, Jee Ye
Sohn, Joo Hyuk
Kim, Gun Min
Koo, Ja Seung
Keum, Ki Chang
Suh, Chang-Ok
Kim, Yong Bae
External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence
title External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence
title_full External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence
title_fullStr External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence
title_full_unstemmed External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence
title_short External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence
title_sort external validation of ibtr! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00059
work_keys_str_mv AT leebyungmin externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT changjeesuk externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT choyoungup externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT parkseho externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT parkhyungseok externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT kimjeeye externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT sohnjoohyuk externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT kimgunmin externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT koojaseung externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT keumkichang externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT suhchangok externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence
AT kimyongbae externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence