Cargando…
External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence
PURPOSE: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram is web-based nomogram that predicts ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). We aimed to validate the IBTR! 2.0 using an external data set. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 2,206 patients, who received breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy from...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00059 |
_version_ | 1783344328961163264 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Byung Min Chang, Jee Suk Cho, Young Up Park, Seho Park, Hyung Seok Kim, Jee Ye Sohn, Joo Hyuk Kim, Gun Min Koo, Ja Seung Keum, Ki Chang Suh, Chang-Ok Kim, Yong Bae |
author_facet | Lee, Byung Min Chang, Jee Suk Cho, Young Up Park, Seho Park, Hyung Seok Kim, Jee Ye Sohn, Joo Hyuk Kim, Gun Min Koo, Ja Seung Keum, Ki Chang Suh, Chang-Ok Kim, Yong Bae |
author_sort | Lee, Byung Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram is web-based nomogram that predicts ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). We aimed to validate the IBTR! 2.0 using an external data set. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 2,206 patients, who received breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy from 1992 to 2012 at our institution, where wide surgical excision is been routinely performed. Discrimination and calibration were used for assessing model performance. Patients with predicted 10-year IBTR risk based on an IBTR! 2.0 nomogram score of <3%, 3%–5%, 5%–10%, and >10% were assigned to groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. We also plotted calibration values to observe the actual IBTR rate against the nomogram-derived 10-year IBTR probabilities. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 73 months (range, 6 to 277 months). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.607, showing poor accordance between the estimated and observed recurrence rate. Calibration plot confirmed that the IBTR! 2.0 nomogram predicted the 10-year IBTR risk higher than the observed IBTR rates in all groups. High discrepancies between nomogram IBTR predictions and observed IBTR rates were observed in overall risk groups. Compared with the original development dataset, our patients had fewer high grade tumors, less margin positivity, and less lymphovascular invasion, and more use of modern systemic therapies. CONCLUSIONS: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram seems to have the moderate discriminative ability with a tendency to over-estimating risk rate. Continued efforts are needed to ensure external applicability of published nomograms by validating the program using an external patient population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6074074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60740742018-08-23 External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence Lee, Byung Min Chang, Jee Suk Cho, Young Up Park, Seho Park, Hyung Seok Kim, Jee Ye Sohn, Joo Hyuk Kim, Gun Min Koo, Ja Seung Keum, Ki Chang Suh, Chang-Ok Kim, Yong Bae Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram is web-based nomogram that predicts ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). We aimed to validate the IBTR! 2.0 using an external data set. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 2,206 patients, who received breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy from 1992 to 2012 at our institution, where wide surgical excision is been routinely performed. Discrimination and calibration were used for assessing model performance. Patients with predicted 10-year IBTR risk based on an IBTR! 2.0 nomogram score of <3%, 3%–5%, 5%–10%, and >10% were assigned to groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. We also plotted calibration values to observe the actual IBTR rate against the nomogram-derived 10-year IBTR probabilities. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 73 months (range, 6 to 277 months). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.607, showing poor accordance between the estimated and observed recurrence rate. Calibration plot confirmed that the IBTR! 2.0 nomogram predicted the 10-year IBTR risk higher than the observed IBTR rates in all groups. High discrepancies between nomogram IBTR predictions and observed IBTR rates were observed in overall risk groups. Compared with the original development dataset, our patients had fewer high grade tumors, less margin positivity, and less lymphovascular invasion, and more use of modern systemic therapies. CONCLUSIONS: IBTR! 2.0 nomogram seems to have the moderate discriminative ability with a tendency to over-estimating risk rate. Continued efforts are needed to ensure external applicability of published nomograms by validating the program using an external patient population. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018-06 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6074074/ /pubmed/29983034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00059 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Byung Min Chang, Jee Suk Cho, Young Up Park, Seho Park, Hyung Seok Kim, Jee Ye Sohn, Joo Hyuk Kim, Gun Min Koo, Ja Seung Keum, Ki Chang Suh, Chang-Ok Kim, Yong Bae External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence |
title | External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence |
title_full | External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence |
title_fullStr | External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence |
title_full_unstemmed | External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence |
title_short | External validation of IBTR! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence |
title_sort | external validation of ibtr! 2.0 nomogram for prediction of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29983034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leebyungmin externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT changjeesuk externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT choyoungup externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT parkseho externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT parkhyungseok externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT kimjeeye externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT sohnjoohyuk externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT kimgunmin externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT koojaseung externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT keumkichang externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT suhchangok externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence AT kimyongbae externalvalidationofibtr20nomogramforpredictionofipsilateralbreasttumorrecurrence |