Cargando…
On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization?
BACKGROUND: On-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency revascularization. This study reports our clinical experience and early outcomes wi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336019 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2015.133 |
_version_ | 1783344338292441088 |
---|---|
author | Aydin, Ahmet Erkut, Bilgehan |
author_facet | Aydin, Ahmet Erkut, Bilgehan |
author_sort | Aydin, Ahmet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: On-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency revascularization. This study reports our clinical experience and early outcomes with the on-pump beating heart coronary surgery on patients with acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: A retrospective study conducted from August 2009 to October, 2015, in a regional training and research hospital in Turkey. METHODS: A total of 1432 patients underwent isolated CABG at our institution. A total of 316 of these patients underwent the on-pump beating heart procedure without cardioplegic arrest by the same surgeon. RESULTS: The time interval from the onset of acute myocardial infarction to CABG was 10 (2.2) hours. The mean number of grafts was 3.0 (0.6). Hospital mortality was 2.9% (9 patients). Twelve patients had low cardiac output syndromes after surgery. Eight of them had renal dysfunction but none of them needed hemodialysis. The mean intensive care unit stay was 3 (2) days and the mean hospital length of stay was 7 (4) days. CONCLUSION: We think that the on-pump beating heart revascularization technique can be a good choice for emergency CABG of high-risk patients with a multivessel coronary artery disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6074131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60741312018-09-21 On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization? Aydin, Ahmet Erkut, Bilgehan Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND: On-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency revascularization. This study reports our clinical experience and early outcomes with the on-pump beating heart coronary surgery on patients with acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: A retrospective study conducted from August 2009 to October, 2015, in a regional training and research hospital in Turkey. METHODS: A total of 1432 patients underwent isolated CABG at our institution. A total of 316 of these patients underwent the on-pump beating heart procedure without cardioplegic arrest by the same surgeon. RESULTS: The time interval from the onset of acute myocardial infarction to CABG was 10 (2.2) hours. The mean number of grafts was 3.0 (0.6). Hospital mortality was 2.9% (9 patients). Twelve patients had low cardiac output syndromes after surgery. Eight of them had renal dysfunction but none of them needed hemodialysis. The mean intensive care unit stay was 3 (2) days and the mean hospital length of stay was 7 (4) days. CONCLUSION: We think that the on-pump beating heart revascularization technique can be a good choice for emergency CABG of high-risk patients with a multivessel coronary artery disease. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC6074131/ /pubmed/26336019 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2015.133 Text en Copyright © 2015, Annals of Saudi Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aydin, Ahmet Erkut, Bilgehan On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization? |
title | On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization? |
title_full | On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization? |
title_fullStr | On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization? |
title_full_unstemmed | On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization? |
title_short | On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization? |
title_sort | on-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: is it valid for emergency revascularization? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336019 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2015.133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aydinahmet onpumpbeatingheartcoronaryrevascularizationisitvalidforemergencyrevascularization AT erkutbilgehan onpumpbeatingheartcoronaryrevascularizationisitvalidforemergencyrevascularization |