Cargando…

On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization?

BACKGROUND: On-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency revascularization. This study reports our clinical experience and early outcomes wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aydin, Ahmet, Erkut, Bilgehan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336019
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2015.133
_version_ 1783344338292441088
author Aydin, Ahmet
Erkut, Bilgehan
author_facet Aydin, Ahmet
Erkut, Bilgehan
author_sort Aydin, Ahmet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: On-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency revascularization. This study reports our clinical experience and early outcomes with the on-pump beating heart coronary surgery on patients with acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: A retrospective study conducted from August 2009 to October, 2015, in a regional training and research hospital in Turkey. METHODS: A total of 1432 patients underwent isolated CABG at our institution. A total of 316 of these patients underwent the on-pump beating heart procedure without cardioplegic arrest by the same surgeon. RESULTS: The time interval from the onset of acute myocardial infarction to CABG was 10 (2.2) hours. The mean number of grafts was 3.0 (0.6). Hospital mortality was 2.9% (9 patients). Twelve patients had low cardiac output syndromes after surgery. Eight of them had renal dysfunction but none of them needed hemodialysis. The mean intensive care unit stay was 3 (2) days and the mean hospital length of stay was 7 (4) days. CONCLUSION: We think that the on-pump beating heart revascularization technique can be a good choice for emergency CABG of high-risk patients with a multivessel coronary artery disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6074131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60741312018-09-21 On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization? Aydin, Ahmet Erkut, Bilgehan Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND: On-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency revascularization. This study reports our clinical experience and early outcomes with the on-pump beating heart coronary surgery on patients with acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: A retrospective study conducted from August 2009 to October, 2015, in a regional training and research hospital in Turkey. METHODS: A total of 1432 patients underwent isolated CABG at our institution. A total of 316 of these patients underwent the on-pump beating heart procedure without cardioplegic arrest by the same surgeon. RESULTS: The time interval from the onset of acute myocardial infarction to CABG was 10 (2.2) hours. The mean number of grafts was 3.0 (0.6). Hospital mortality was 2.9% (9 patients). Twelve patients had low cardiac output syndromes after surgery. Eight of them had renal dysfunction but none of them needed hemodialysis. The mean intensive care unit stay was 3 (2) days and the mean hospital length of stay was 7 (4) days. CONCLUSION: We think that the on-pump beating heart revascularization technique can be a good choice for emergency CABG of high-risk patients with a multivessel coronary artery disease. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC6074131/ /pubmed/26336019 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2015.133 Text en Copyright © 2015, Annals of Saudi Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Aydin, Ahmet
Erkut, Bilgehan
On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization?
title On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization?
title_full On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization?
title_fullStr On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization?
title_full_unstemmed On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization?
title_short On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization?
title_sort on-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: is it valid for emergency revascularization?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336019
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2015.133
work_keys_str_mv AT aydinahmet onpumpbeatingheartcoronaryrevascularizationisitvalidforemergencyrevascularization
AT erkutbilgehan onpumpbeatingheartcoronaryrevascularizationisitvalidforemergencyrevascularization