Cargando…
Evaluating “superiority”, “equivalence” and “non-inferiority” in clinical trials
Clinical studies are usually performed with the aim of justifying that a new treatment approach is “superior” to the common standard approach (active control) with respect to benefits. In a general sense, this justification is carried out on the basis of the “null hypothesis significance test” with...
Autores principales: | Turan, Fatma Nesrin, Şenocak, Mustafa |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17684429 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2007.284 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparisons of Superiority, Non-inferiority, and Equivalence Trials
por: WANG, Bokai, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Editorial on hypothesis and objectives in clinical trials: superiority, equivalence and non-inferiority
por: Gonzalez, Claudio D, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Bayes factors for superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence designs
por: van Ravenzwaaij, Don, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Equivalence and non inferiority trials
por: D’Agostino, Ralph B
Publicado: (2011) -
Equivalence and Non-inferiority Trials of CAM
por: Ernst, Edzard
Publicado: (2004)