Cargando…

Evaluation of the cutting seton as a method of treatment for perianal fistula

BACKGROUND: Perianal fistulas are distressing for the patient and sometimes a challenge for the surgeon. Different methods for the treatment of perianal fistulas have a range of success rates and use of the cutting seton is still debatable. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the recurrence, success rate and i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raslan, Salah M., Aladwani, Mohammed, Alsanea, Nasser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27236393
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2016.210
_version_ 1783344435589808128
author Raslan, Salah M.
Aladwani, Mohammed
Alsanea, Nasser
author_facet Raslan, Salah M.
Aladwani, Mohammed
Alsanea, Nasser
author_sort Raslan, Salah M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Perianal fistulas are distressing for the patient and sometimes a challenge for the surgeon. Different methods for the treatment of perianal fistulas have a range of success rates and use of the cutting seton is still debatable. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the recurrence, success rate and incontinence with the cutting seton method for treating perianal fistula. DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive study. SETTING: Al-Hada Armed Forces Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Taif, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied all patients with high perianal fistula admitted to the department of general surgery in our hospital with a diagnosis of perianal fistula in the period from December 2012 to December 2013 (12 months). Patients were followed for postoperative recurrence and incontinence rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measured was either complete cure or recurrence. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent cutting seton insertion for fistula in ano. The recurrence rate was 9.8%. The postoperative rate of incontinence was 15.7% to flatus and 5.9% to fluid stools. There was no incontinence to solid stools. CONCLUSION: The cutting seton is a valid option for a complex fistula in ano, but in female patients and those with previous peri-anal surgery, other surgical options are advised. LIMITATIONS: Patients with low perianal fistula, Crohn’s disease, acute perianal abscess and patients with major incontinence were excluded.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6074548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60745482018-09-21 Evaluation of the cutting seton as a method of treatment for perianal fistula Raslan, Salah M. Aladwani, Mohammed Alsanea, Nasser Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Perianal fistulas are distressing for the patient and sometimes a challenge for the surgeon. Different methods for the treatment of perianal fistulas have a range of success rates and use of the cutting seton is still debatable. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the recurrence, success rate and incontinence with the cutting seton method for treating perianal fistula. DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive study. SETTING: Al-Hada Armed Forces Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Taif, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied all patients with high perianal fistula admitted to the department of general surgery in our hospital with a diagnosis of perianal fistula in the period from December 2012 to December 2013 (12 months). Patients were followed for postoperative recurrence and incontinence rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measured was either complete cure or recurrence. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent cutting seton insertion for fistula in ano. The recurrence rate was 9.8%. The postoperative rate of incontinence was 15.7% to flatus and 5.9% to fluid stools. There was no incontinence to solid stools. CONCLUSION: The cutting seton is a valid option for a complex fistula in ano, but in female patients and those with previous peri-anal surgery, other surgical options are advised. LIMITATIONS: Patients with low perianal fistula, Crohn’s disease, acute perianal abscess and patients with major incontinence were excluded. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC6074548/ /pubmed/27236393 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2016.210 Text en Copyright © 2016, Annals of Saudi Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Raslan, Salah M.
Aladwani, Mohammed
Alsanea, Nasser
Evaluation of the cutting seton as a method of treatment for perianal fistula
title Evaluation of the cutting seton as a method of treatment for perianal fistula
title_full Evaluation of the cutting seton as a method of treatment for perianal fistula
title_fullStr Evaluation of the cutting seton as a method of treatment for perianal fistula
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the cutting seton as a method of treatment for perianal fistula
title_short Evaluation of the cutting seton as a method of treatment for perianal fistula
title_sort evaluation of the cutting seton as a method of treatment for perianal fistula
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27236393
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2016.210
work_keys_str_mv AT raslansalahm evaluationofthecuttingsetonasamethodoftreatmentforperianalfistula
AT aladwanimohammed evaluationofthecuttingsetonasamethodoftreatmentforperianalfistula
AT alsaneanasser evaluationofthecuttingsetonasamethodoftreatmentforperianalfistula