Cargando…

Factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free DNA: A systematic review of the methodology literature

BACKGROUND: Circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) is under investigation as a liquid biopsy of cancer for early detection, monitoring disease progression and therapeutic response. This systematic review of the primary cfDNA literature aims to identify and evaluate factors that influence recovery of cfDNA, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trigg, R.M., Martinson, L.J., Parpart-Li, S., Shaw, J.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00699
_version_ 1783344450227929088
author Trigg, R.M.
Martinson, L.J.
Parpart-Li, S.
Shaw, J.A.
author_facet Trigg, R.M.
Martinson, L.J.
Parpart-Li, S.
Shaw, J.A.
author_sort Trigg, R.M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) is under investigation as a liquid biopsy of cancer for early detection, monitoring disease progression and therapeutic response. This systematic review of the primary cfDNA literature aims to identify and evaluate factors that influence recovery of cfDNA, and to outline evidence-based recommendations for standardization of methods. METHODS: A search of the Ovid and Cochrane databases was undertaken in May 2018 to obtain relevant literature on cfDNA isolation and quantification. Retrieved titles and abstracts were reviewed by two authors. The factors evaluated include choice of specimen type (plasma or serum); time-to-processing of whole blood; blood specimen tube; centrifugation protocol (speed, time, temperature and number of spins); and methods of cfDNA isolation and quantification. FINDINGS: Of 4,172 articles identified through the database search, 52 proceeded to full-text review and 37 met the criteria for inclusion. A quantitative analysis was not possible, due to significant heterogeneity in methodological approaches between studies. Therefore, included data was tabulated and a textual qualitative synthesis approach was taken. INTERPRETATION: This is the first systematic review of methodological factors that influence recovery and quantification of cfDNA, enabling recommendations to be made that will support standardization of methodological approaches towards development of blood-based cancer tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6074610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60746102018-08-09 Factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free DNA: A systematic review of the methodology literature Trigg, R.M. Martinson, L.J. Parpart-Li, S. Shaw, J.A. Heliyon Article BACKGROUND: Circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) is under investigation as a liquid biopsy of cancer for early detection, monitoring disease progression and therapeutic response. This systematic review of the primary cfDNA literature aims to identify and evaluate factors that influence recovery of cfDNA, and to outline evidence-based recommendations for standardization of methods. METHODS: A search of the Ovid and Cochrane databases was undertaken in May 2018 to obtain relevant literature on cfDNA isolation and quantification. Retrieved titles and abstracts were reviewed by two authors. The factors evaluated include choice of specimen type (plasma or serum); time-to-processing of whole blood; blood specimen tube; centrifugation protocol (speed, time, temperature and number of spins); and methods of cfDNA isolation and quantification. FINDINGS: Of 4,172 articles identified through the database search, 52 proceeded to full-text review and 37 met the criteria for inclusion. A quantitative analysis was not possible, due to significant heterogeneity in methodological approaches between studies. Therefore, included data was tabulated and a textual qualitative synthesis approach was taken. INTERPRETATION: This is the first systematic review of methodological factors that influence recovery and quantification of cfDNA, enabling recommendations to be made that will support standardization of methodological approaches towards development of blood-based cancer tests. Elsevier 2018-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6074610/ /pubmed/30094369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00699 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Trigg, R.M.
Martinson, L.J.
Parpart-Li, S.
Shaw, J.A.
Factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free DNA: A systematic review of the methodology literature
title Factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free DNA: A systematic review of the methodology literature
title_full Factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free DNA: A systematic review of the methodology literature
title_fullStr Factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free DNA: A systematic review of the methodology literature
title_full_unstemmed Factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free DNA: A systematic review of the methodology literature
title_short Factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free DNA: A systematic review of the methodology literature
title_sort factors that influence quality and yield of circulating-free dna: a systematic review of the methodology literature
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6074610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00699
work_keys_str_mv AT triggrm factorsthatinfluencequalityandyieldofcirculatingfreednaasystematicreviewofthemethodologyliterature
AT martinsonlj factorsthatinfluencequalityandyieldofcirculatingfreednaasystematicreviewofthemethodologyliterature
AT parpartlis factorsthatinfluencequalityandyieldofcirculatingfreednaasystematicreviewofthemethodologyliterature
AT shawja factorsthatinfluencequalityandyieldofcirculatingfreednaasystematicreviewofthemethodologyliterature