Cargando…
Ostracized but why? Effects of attributions and empathy on connecting with the socially excluded
The present research examined people’s responses towards others’ exclusion experience. The authors predicted that both causal attributions and empathy would mediate whether people affiliate with a victim of an ambiguous exclusion experience. Perceivers observing another’s exclusion (relative to incl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6075751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201183 |
_version_ | 1783344608270352384 |
---|---|
author | Bernstein, Michael J. Chen, Zhansheng Poon, Kai-Tak Benfield, Jacob A. Ng, Henry K. S. |
author_facet | Bernstein, Michael J. Chen, Zhansheng Poon, Kai-Tak Benfield, Jacob A. Ng, Henry K. S. |
author_sort | Bernstein, Michael J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present research examined people’s responses towards others’ exclusion experience. The authors predicted that both causal attributions and empathy would mediate whether people affiliate with a victim of an ambiguous exclusion experience. Perceivers observing another’s exclusion (relative to inclusion) without clearly announced reasons chose to affiliate with the target and this was mediated by increased external attributions for the exclusion (Studies 1a, 1b, 2). When the attributions people made for the exclusion of a target was experimentally manipulated, internal attributions decreased desire for affiliation relative to external or ambiguous attributions, and this was mediated by differences in empathy for the target (Study 3). Further, external attributions arisen from perceiving a causally unclear exclusion leads to an empathetic response which results in an increased desire to affiliate with the target (Study 4). Future directions on perceptions of those who have been excluded are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6075751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60757512018-08-16 Ostracized but why? Effects of attributions and empathy on connecting with the socially excluded Bernstein, Michael J. Chen, Zhansheng Poon, Kai-Tak Benfield, Jacob A. Ng, Henry K. S. PLoS One Research Article The present research examined people’s responses towards others’ exclusion experience. The authors predicted that both causal attributions and empathy would mediate whether people affiliate with a victim of an ambiguous exclusion experience. Perceivers observing another’s exclusion (relative to inclusion) without clearly announced reasons chose to affiliate with the target and this was mediated by increased external attributions for the exclusion (Studies 1a, 1b, 2). When the attributions people made for the exclusion of a target was experimentally manipulated, internal attributions decreased desire for affiliation relative to external or ambiguous attributions, and this was mediated by differences in empathy for the target (Study 3). Further, external attributions arisen from perceiving a causally unclear exclusion leads to an empathetic response which results in an increased desire to affiliate with the target (Study 4). Future directions on perceptions of those who have been excluded are discussed. Public Library of Science 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6075751/ /pubmed/30075005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201183 Text en © 2018 Bernstein et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bernstein, Michael J. Chen, Zhansheng Poon, Kai-Tak Benfield, Jacob A. Ng, Henry K. S. Ostracized but why? Effects of attributions and empathy on connecting with the socially excluded |
title | Ostracized but why? Effects of attributions and empathy on connecting with the socially excluded |
title_full | Ostracized but why? Effects of attributions and empathy on connecting with the socially excluded |
title_fullStr | Ostracized but why? Effects of attributions and empathy on connecting with the socially excluded |
title_full_unstemmed | Ostracized but why? Effects of attributions and empathy on connecting with the socially excluded |
title_short | Ostracized but why? Effects of attributions and empathy on connecting with the socially excluded |
title_sort | ostracized but why? effects of attributions and empathy on connecting with the socially excluded |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6075751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernsteinmichaelj ostracizedbutwhyeffectsofattributionsandempathyonconnectingwiththesociallyexcluded AT chenzhansheng ostracizedbutwhyeffectsofattributionsandempathyonconnectingwiththesociallyexcluded AT poonkaitak ostracizedbutwhyeffectsofattributionsandempathyonconnectingwiththesociallyexcluded AT benfieldjacoba ostracizedbutwhyeffectsofattributionsandempathyonconnectingwiththesociallyexcluded AT nghenryks ostracizedbutwhyeffectsofattributionsandempathyonconnectingwiththesociallyexcluded |