Cargando…

Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy Versus Collagenase Treatment for Dupuytren Contracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Two-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND: Local disruption of the cord that causes contracture of the finger in Dupuytren disease can be achieved either through mechanical division by percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) or through enzymatic digestion by injectable collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH). This study was desig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strömberg, Joakim, Ibsen Sörensen, Allan, Fridén, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6075875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29975270
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01128
_version_ 1783344621028376576
author Strömberg, Joakim
Ibsen Sörensen, Allan
Fridén, Jan
author_facet Strömberg, Joakim
Ibsen Sörensen, Allan
Fridén, Jan
author_sort Strömberg, Joakim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Local disruption of the cord that causes contracture of the finger in Dupuytren disease can be achieved either through mechanical division by percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) or through enzymatic digestion by injectable collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH). This study was designed to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes between patients who had been treated with each method. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial was designed and included 156 patients with a contracture of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of ≥20°. The patients were allocated to treatment with either PNF or CCH. The primary outcome was a reduction of the MCP contracture to <5°. Secondary outcomes included the reduction of any concomitant contracture of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, the presence of Dupuytren cords, and changes in patient-reported outcomes as measured with the URAM (Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de Main) and QuickDASH (an abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]) questionnaires and visual analog scales for patient satisfaction. All treatments were performed by a single surgeon and all blinded follow-up measurements were made by a single physiotherapist. The participants were assessed at 1 week, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years after the interventions. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients (97%) were examined at 2 years, at which time 58 patients (76%) treated with CCH and 60 (79%) treated with PNF retained a straight MCP joint. No cords were detectable in >50% of the patients at 2 years. There were no significant differences in the reduction of PIP contracture, range of motion, or patient-reported outcomes between the 2 treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated no advantage of CCH treatment compared with PNF in terms of clinical outcome at any time during the 2-year follow-up. The significant decrease in the number of pathological cords (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) after disruption regardless of the method used may indicate that resorption of pathological collagen occurs when the tension in the Dupuytren cord is diminished. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6075875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60758752018-08-17 Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy Versus Collagenase Treatment for Dupuytren Contracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Two-Year Follow-up Strömberg, Joakim Ibsen Sörensen, Allan Fridén, Jan J Bone Joint Surg Am Scientific Articles BACKGROUND: Local disruption of the cord that causes contracture of the finger in Dupuytren disease can be achieved either through mechanical division by percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) or through enzymatic digestion by injectable collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH). This study was designed to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes between patients who had been treated with each method. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial was designed and included 156 patients with a contracture of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of ≥20°. The patients were allocated to treatment with either PNF or CCH. The primary outcome was a reduction of the MCP contracture to <5°. Secondary outcomes included the reduction of any concomitant contracture of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, the presence of Dupuytren cords, and changes in patient-reported outcomes as measured with the URAM (Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de Main) and QuickDASH (an abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]) questionnaires and visual analog scales for patient satisfaction. All treatments were performed by a single surgeon and all blinded follow-up measurements were made by a single physiotherapist. The participants were assessed at 1 week, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years after the interventions. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients (97%) were examined at 2 years, at which time 58 patients (76%) treated with CCH and 60 (79%) treated with PNF retained a straight MCP joint. No cords were detectable in >50% of the patients at 2 years. There were no significant differences in the reduction of PIP contracture, range of motion, or patient-reported outcomes between the 2 treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated no advantage of CCH treatment compared with PNF in terms of clinical outcome at any time during the 2-year follow-up. The significant decrease in the number of pathological cords (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) after disruption regardless of the method used may indicate that resorption of pathological collagen occurs when the tension in the Dupuytren cord is diminished. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2018-07-05 2018-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6075875/ /pubmed/29975270 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01128 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Strömberg, Joakim
Ibsen Sörensen, Allan
Fridén, Jan
Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy Versus Collagenase Treatment for Dupuytren Contracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Two-Year Follow-up
title Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy Versus Collagenase Treatment for Dupuytren Contracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Two-Year Follow-up
title_full Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy Versus Collagenase Treatment for Dupuytren Contracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Two-Year Follow-up
title_fullStr Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy Versus Collagenase Treatment for Dupuytren Contracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Two-Year Follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy Versus Collagenase Treatment for Dupuytren Contracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Two-Year Follow-up
title_short Percutaneous Needle Fasciotomy Versus Collagenase Treatment for Dupuytren Contracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Two-Year Follow-up
title_sort percutaneous needle fasciotomy versus collagenase treatment for dupuytren contracture: a randomized controlled trial with a two-year follow-up
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6075875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29975270
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01128
work_keys_str_mv AT strombergjoakim percutaneousneedlefasciotomyversuscollagenasetreatmentfordupuytrencontracturearandomizedcontrolledtrialwithatwoyearfollowup
AT ibsensorensenallan percutaneousneedlefasciotomyversuscollagenasetreatmentfordupuytrencontracturearandomizedcontrolledtrialwithatwoyearfollowup
AT fridenjan percutaneousneedlefasciotomyversuscollagenasetreatmentfordupuytrencontracturearandomizedcontrolledtrialwithatwoyearfollowup