Cargando…
Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) as a prognosis factor in gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis
The oncogenic role of Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) which is regarded as a promising target antigen for cancer immunotherapy has been demonstrated in many types of cancer, but the relationship between expression of WT1 and the prognosis value in gynecological cancer reminds unclear. We performed a meta-analy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011485 |
_version_ | 1783344638682202112 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Jingjing Gu, Yang Li, Qing Zhong, Huanxin Wang, Xiaoxue Zheng, Zhenxia Hu, Wenfeng Wen, Lanling |
author_facet | Lu, Jingjing Gu, Yang Li, Qing Zhong, Huanxin Wang, Xiaoxue Zheng, Zhenxia Hu, Wenfeng Wen, Lanling |
author_sort | Lu, Jingjing |
collection | PubMed |
description | The oncogenic role of Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) which is regarded as a promising target antigen for cancer immunotherapy has been demonstrated in many types of cancer, but the relationship between expression of WT1 and the prognosis value in gynecological cancer reminds unclear. We performed a meta-analysis with thirteen published studies including 2205 patients searched from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, whose results are expressed by overall survival (OS) or disease-specific survival (DSS) or disease-free survival or relapse/recurrence-free survival (RFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gynecological cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to investigate prognostic of WT1 expression in patients with gynecological cancer. Finally, the overexpression of WT1 was borderlinely associated with poor OS (metaHR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.98–2.31) in univariate model. We found a significant association with poor DSS (metaHR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.24–2.08) and DFS/RFS/PFS (metaHR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.22–3.46). The subgroup analyses revealed that the expression of WT1 predicted the poor DSS (metaHR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.42–2.73), and DFS/RFS/PFS (metaHR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.81–3.48) in patients with ovarian cancer. In summary, WT1 overexpression indicates a poor prognosis in patients with some gynecological tumors, but more studies are needed to confirm these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6076078 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60760782018-08-17 Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) as a prognosis factor in gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis Lu, Jingjing Gu, Yang Li, Qing Zhong, Huanxin Wang, Xiaoxue Zheng, Zhenxia Hu, Wenfeng Wen, Lanling Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article The oncogenic role of Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) which is regarded as a promising target antigen for cancer immunotherapy has been demonstrated in many types of cancer, but the relationship between expression of WT1 and the prognosis value in gynecological cancer reminds unclear. We performed a meta-analysis with thirteen published studies including 2205 patients searched from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, whose results are expressed by overall survival (OS) or disease-specific survival (DSS) or disease-free survival or relapse/recurrence-free survival (RFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gynecological cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to investigate prognostic of WT1 expression in patients with gynecological cancer. Finally, the overexpression of WT1 was borderlinely associated with poor OS (metaHR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.98–2.31) in univariate model. We found a significant association with poor DSS (metaHR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.24–2.08) and DFS/RFS/PFS (metaHR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.22–3.46). The subgroup analyses revealed that the expression of WT1 predicted the poor DSS (metaHR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.42–2.73), and DFS/RFS/PFS (metaHR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.81–3.48) in patients with ovarian cancer. In summary, WT1 overexpression indicates a poor prognosis in patients with some gynecological tumors, but more studies are needed to confirm these findings. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6076078/ /pubmed/29995811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011485 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lu, Jingjing Gu, Yang Li, Qing Zhong, Huanxin Wang, Xiaoxue Zheng, Zhenxia Hu, Wenfeng Wen, Lanling Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) as a prognosis factor in gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis |
title | Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) as a prognosis factor in gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) as a prognosis factor in gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) as a prognosis factor in gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) as a prognosis factor in gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) as a prognosis factor in gynecological cancers: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | wilms’ tumor 1 (wt1) as a prognosis factor in gynecological cancers: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lujingjing wilmstumor1wt1asaprognosisfactoringynecologicalcancersametaanalysis AT guyang wilmstumor1wt1asaprognosisfactoringynecologicalcancersametaanalysis AT liqing wilmstumor1wt1asaprognosisfactoringynecologicalcancersametaanalysis AT zhonghuanxin wilmstumor1wt1asaprognosisfactoringynecologicalcancersametaanalysis AT wangxiaoxue wilmstumor1wt1asaprognosisfactoringynecologicalcancersametaanalysis AT zhengzhenxia wilmstumor1wt1asaprognosisfactoringynecologicalcancersametaanalysis AT huwenfeng wilmstumor1wt1asaprognosisfactoringynecologicalcancersametaanalysis AT wenlanling wilmstumor1wt1asaprognosisfactoringynecologicalcancersametaanalysis |