Cargando…

A retrospective controlled clinical study of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

To compare the characteristics of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve (MTC) in patients with Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and differences in fulcrum-bending flexibility, correction rate, and correction index between different segments. Included in this study were 40 c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Jian, Fan, Jianping, Chen, Yuanyuan, Yang, Changwei, Li, Gengwu, Li, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011473
_version_ 1783344660489437184
author Zhao, Jian
Fan, Jianping
Chen, Yuanyuan
Yang, Changwei
Li, Gengwu
Li, Ming
author_facet Zhao, Jian
Fan, Jianping
Chen, Yuanyuan
Yang, Changwei
Li, Gengwu
Li, Ming
author_sort Zhao, Jian
collection PubMed
description To compare the characteristics of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve (MTC) in patients with Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and differences in fulcrum-bending flexibility, correction rate, and correction index between different segments. Included in this study were 40 consecutive patients with Lenke 1 AIS who received posterior correction and fusion with pedicle screws. Cobb angle based on the proximal (T5–T7 or T6–T8), apical (T7–T9 or T8–T10), and distal (T9–T11 or T10–T12) segments in the fulcrum-bending position was measured before and after surgery. The flexibility ([Cobb angle of each segment − residual Cobb angle on fulcrum bending]/Cobb angle of each segment × 100%), correction rate ([Cobb angle of each segment − postoperative residual Cobb angle]/Cobb angle of each segment × 100%]), and correction index (correction rate of each segment/preoperative flexibility of each segment) in different segments were calculated. Comparative analyses were conducted by variance analysis. The mean age before surgery, Cobb angle, Risser sign, and follow-up time were 14.15 ± 2.13 years, 51.17 ± 10.72°, 2.78 ± 1.73, and 43.75 ± 9.82 months, respectively. MTC Cobb angle of the proximal segments was similar to that of the distal ones (12.88 ± 4.81 vs 12.85 ± 5.00) versus 25.45 ± 5.90 in the middle segments (P < .001). The flexibility was higher in the distal segments than that in the proximal or apical segments (66.43 ± 0.22% vs 43.78 ± 0.20% or 32.55 ± 0.17%, P < .001). One week after surgery, the correction rate in these 3 segments was 69.55 ± 0.1%, 66.25 ± 0.17%, and 75.28 ± 0.16 (P = .067), and the correction index was 2.15 ± 1.78, 3.16 ± 3.60, and 1.53 ± 1.93 (P = .019); the correction rate during the 3-year follow-up period was 68.06 ± 0.19%, 69.98 ± 0.15%, and 73.29 ± 0.17 (P = .212); and the correction index was 2.12 ± 1.78, 3.20 ± 3.54, and 1.49 ± 1.93 (P = .012), respectively. The proximal, apical, and distal segments in Lenke 1 AIS accounted for about 25%, 50%, and 25% of MTC Cobb angle, respectively. The distal segments were found to be most flexible and the apical segments most rigid. The correction rate was similar between the proximal, apical, and distal segments, and the correction index in the apical segments was higher than that in the proximal and distal segments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6076177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60761772018-08-17 A retrospective controlled clinical study of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Zhao, Jian Fan, Jianping Chen, Yuanyuan Yang, Changwei Li, Gengwu Li, Ming Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article To compare the characteristics of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve (MTC) in patients with Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and differences in fulcrum-bending flexibility, correction rate, and correction index between different segments. Included in this study were 40 consecutive patients with Lenke 1 AIS who received posterior correction and fusion with pedicle screws. Cobb angle based on the proximal (T5–T7 or T6–T8), apical (T7–T9 or T8–T10), and distal (T9–T11 or T10–T12) segments in the fulcrum-bending position was measured before and after surgery. The flexibility ([Cobb angle of each segment − residual Cobb angle on fulcrum bending]/Cobb angle of each segment × 100%), correction rate ([Cobb angle of each segment − postoperative residual Cobb angle]/Cobb angle of each segment × 100%]), and correction index (correction rate of each segment/preoperative flexibility of each segment) in different segments were calculated. Comparative analyses were conducted by variance analysis. The mean age before surgery, Cobb angle, Risser sign, and follow-up time were 14.15 ± 2.13 years, 51.17 ± 10.72°, 2.78 ± 1.73, and 43.75 ± 9.82 months, respectively. MTC Cobb angle of the proximal segments was similar to that of the distal ones (12.88 ± 4.81 vs 12.85 ± 5.00) versus 25.45 ± 5.90 in the middle segments (P < .001). The flexibility was higher in the distal segments than that in the proximal or apical segments (66.43 ± 0.22% vs 43.78 ± 0.20% or 32.55 ± 0.17%, P < .001). One week after surgery, the correction rate in these 3 segments was 69.55 ± 0.1%, 66.25 ± 0.17%, and 75.28 ± 0.16 (P = .067), and the correction index was 2.15 ± 1.78, 3.16 ± 3.60, and 1.53 ± 1.93 (P = .019); the correction rate during the 3-year follow-up period was 68.06 ± 0.19%, 69.98 ± 0.15%, and 73.29 ± 0.17 (P = .212); and the correction index was 2.12 ± 1.78, 3.20 ± 3.54, and 1.49 ± 1.93 (P = .012), respectively. The proximal, apical, and distal segments in Lenke 1 AIS accounted for about 25%, 50%, and 25% of MTC Cobb angle, respectively. The distal segments were found to be most flexible and the apical segments most rigid. The correction rate was similar between the proximal, apical, and distal segments, and the correction index in the apical segments was higher than that in the proximal and distal segments. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6076177/ /pubmed/29995807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011473 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Jian
Fan, Jianping
Chen, Yuanyuan
Yang, Changwei
Li, Gengwu
Li, Ming
A retrospective controlled clinical study of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
title A retrospective controlled clinical study of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
title_full A retrospective controlled clinical study of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
title_fullStr A retrospective controlled clinical study of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective controlled clinical study of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
title_short A retrospective controlled clinical study of Cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
title_sort retrospective controlled clinical study of cobb angle distribution of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011473
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaojian aretrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT fanjianping aretrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT chenyuanyuan aretrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT yangchangwei aretrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT ligengwu aretrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT liming aretrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT zhaojian retrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT fanjianping retrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT chenyuanyuan retrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT yangchangwei retrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT ligengwu retrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis
AT liming retrospectivecontrolledclinicalstudyofcobbangledistributionofthemainthoraciccurveinadolescentidiopathicscoliosis