Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China
OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. In China, sorafenib and oxaliplatin plus infusional-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) are approved for the systemic treatment of advanced HCC. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these therapie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0112-0 |
_version_ | 1783344709829132288 |
---|---|
author | Qin, Shukui Kruger, Eliza Tan, Seng Chuen Cheng, Shuqun Wang, Nanya Liang, Jun |
author_facet | Qin, Shukui Kruger, Eliza Tan, Seng Chuen Cheng, Shuqun Wang, Nanya Liang, Jun |
author_sort | Qin, Shukui |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. In China, sorafenib and oxaliplatin plus infusional-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) are approved for the systemic treatment of advanced HCC. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these therapies from a healthcare system perspective and a patient perspectives. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed using overall and progression-free survival rates and adverse event (AE) rate from two randomized controlled studies of advanced HCC patients from Asia: EACH for FOLFOX4 and ORIENTAL for sorafenib. The patients in the Markov model were followed until death, the length of each Markov cycle was 1 month, and the survival was adjusted for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Direct medical costs included costs of therapies, AE treatment, general ward and tests. Costs were derived from published sources, interviews with oncologists and hospital data from China. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: From the healthcare system perspective, FOLFOX4 dominated sorafenib with lower therapy costs (FOLFOX4: US$ 6972; sorafenib: US$ 12,289), lower direct medical costs (FOLFOX4: US$ 8428; sorafenib: US$ 12,798), and higher QALYs (FOLFOX4: 0.42; sorafenib: 0.38) per patient. This result was robust according to comprehensive one-way sensitivity analyses. According to the PSA, at the cost-effectiveness threshold for China (3 × GDP, US$ 22,073), FOLFOX4 should be chosen in 63.9% of simulations. From the patient perspective, FOLFOX4 also dominated sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that FOLFOX4 dominates sorafenib because it appears to provide higher effectiveness with significantly lower costs in treating Chinese advanced HCC patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0112-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6076412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60764122018-08-07 Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China Qin, Shukui Kruger, Eliza Tan, Seng Chuen Cheng, Shuqun Wang, Nanya Liang, Jun Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. In China, sorafenib and oxaliplatin plus infusional-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) are approved for the systemic treatment of advanced HCC. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these therapies from a healthcare system perspective and a patient perspectives. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed using overall and progression-free survival rates and adverse event (AE) rate from two randomized controlled studies of advanced HCC patients from Asia: EACH for FOLFOX4 and ORIENTAL for sorafenib. The patients in the Markov model were followed until death, the length of each Markov cycle was 1 month, and the survival was adjusted for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Direct medical costs included costs of therapies, AE treatment, general ward and tests. Costs were derived from published sources, interviews with oncologists and hospital data from China. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: From the healthcare system perspective, FOLFOX4 dominated sorafenib with lower therapy costs (FOLFOX4: US$ 6972; sorafenib: US$ 12,289), lower direct medical costs (FOLFOX4: US$ 8428; sorafenib: US$ 12,798), and higher QALYs (FOLFOX4: 0.42; sorafenib: 0.38) per patient. This result was robust according to comprehensive one-way sensitivity analyses. According to the PSA, at the cost-effectiveness threshold for China (3 × GDP, US$ 22,073), FOLFOX4 should be chosen in 63.9% of simulations. From the patient perspective, FOLFOX4 also dominated sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that FOLFOX4 dominates sorafenib because it appears to provide higher effectiveness with significantly lower costs in treating Chinese advanced HCC patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0112-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6076412/ /pubmed/30087583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0112-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Qin, Shukui Kruger, Eliza Tan, Seng Chuen Cheng, Shuqun Wang, Nanya Liang, Jun Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of folfox4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in china |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0112-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qinshukui costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina AT krugereliza costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina AT tansengchuen costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina AT chengshuqun costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina AT wangnanya costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina AT liangjun costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina |