Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China

OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. In China, sorafenib and oxaliplatin plus infusional-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) are approved for the systemic treatment of advanced HCC. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these therapie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Shukui, Kruger, Eliza, Tan, Seng Chuen, Cheng, Shuqun, Wang, Nanya, Liang, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0112-0
_version_ 1783344709829132288
author Qin, Shukui
Kruger, Eliza
Tan, Seng Chuen
Cheng, Shuqun
Wang, Nanya
Liang, Jun
author_facet Qin, Shukui
Kruger, Eliza
Tan, Seng Chuen
Cheng, Shuqun
Wang, Nanya
Liang, Jun
author_sort Qin, Shukui
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. In China, sorafenib and oxaliplatin plus infusional-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) are approved for the systemic treatment of advanced HCC. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these therapies from a healthcare system perspective and a patient perspectives. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed using overall and progression-free survival rates and adverse event (AE) rate from two randomized controlled studies of advanced HCC patients from Asia: EACH for FOLFOX4 and ORIENTAL for sorafenib. The patients in the Markov model were followed until death, the length of each Markov cycle was 1 month, and the survival was adjusted for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Direct medical costs included costs of therapies, AE treatment, general ward and tests. Costs were derived from published sources, interviews with oncologists and hospital data from China. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: From the healthcare system perspective, FOLFOX4 dominated sorafenib with lower therapy costs (FOLFOX4: US$ 6972; sorafenib: US$ 12,289), lower direct medical costs (FOLFOX4: US$ 8428; sorafenib: US$ 12,798), and higher QALYs (FOLFOX4: 0.42; sorafenib: 0.38) per patient. This result was robust according to comprehensive one-way sensitivity analyses. According to the PSA, at the cost-effectiveness threshold for China (3 × GDP, US$ 22,073), FOLFOX4 should be chosen in 63.9% of simulations. From the patient perspective, FOLFOX4 also dominated sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that FOLFOX4 dominates sorafenib because it appears to provide higher effectiveness with significantly lower costs in treating Chinese advanced HCC patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0112-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6076412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60764122018-08-07 Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China Qin, Shukui Kruger, Eliza Tan, Seng Chuen Cheng, Shuqun Wang, Nanya Liang, Jun Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. In China, sorafenib and oxaliplatin plus infusional-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) are approved for the systemic treatment of advanced HCC. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of these therapies from a healthcare system perspective and a patient perspectives. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed using overall and progression-free survival rates and adverse event (AE) rate from two randomized controlled studies of advanced HCC patients from Asia: EACH for FOLFOX4 and ORIENTAL for sorafenib. The patients in the Markov model were followed until death, the length of each Markov cycle was 1 month, and the survival was adjusted for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Direct medical costs included costs of therapies, AE treatment, general ward and tests. Costs were derived from published sources, interviews with oncologists and hospital data from China. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: From the healthcare system perspective, FOLFOX4 dominated sorafenib with lower therapy costs (FOLFOX4: US$ 6972; sorafenib: US$ 12,289), lower direct medical costs (FOLFOX4: US$ 8428; sorafenib: US$ 12,798), and higher QALYs (FOLFOX4: 0.42; sorafenib: 0.38) per patient. This result was robust according to comprehensive one-way sensitivity analyses. According to the PSA, at the cost-effectiveness threshold for China (3 × GDP, US$ 22,073), FOLFOX4 should be chosen in 63.9% of simulations. From the patient perspective, FOLFOX4 also dominated sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that FOLFOX4 dominates sorafenib because it appears to provide higher effectiveness with significantly lower costs in treating Chinese advanced HCC patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0112-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6076412/ /pubmed/30087583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0112-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Qin, Shukui
Kruger, Eliza
Tan, Seng Chuen
Cheng, Shuqun
Wang, Nanya
Liang, Jun
Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of folfox4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in china
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0112-0
work_keys_str_mv AT qinshukui costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina
AT krugereliza costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina
AT tansengchuen costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina
AT chengshuqun costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina
AT wangnanya costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina
AT liangjun costeffectivenessanalysisoffolfox4andsorafenibforthetreatmentofadvancedhepatocellularcarcinomainchina