Cargando…

Efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars: A randomized clinical trial

Background: Successful anesthesia is a major concern in during pulpotomy treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block using 2% lidocaine and buccal infiltration using 4% articaine for pulpotomy of mandibular primary second molars. Methods:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghadimi, Sara, Shahrabi, Mahdi, Khosravi, Zahra, Behroozi, Rooholah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087759
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.015
_version_ 1783344796959506432
author Ghadimi, Sara
Shahrabi, Mahdi
Khosravi, Zahra
Behroozi, Rooholah
author_facet Ghadimi, Sara
Shahrabi, Mahdi
Khosravi, Zahra
Behroozi, Rooholah
author_sort Ghadimi, Sara
collection PubMed
description Background: Successful anesthesia is a major concern in during pulpotomy treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block using 2% lidocaine and buccal infiltration using 4% articaine for pulpotomy of mandibular primary second molars. Methods: This randomized cross-over clinical trial was performed in 23 children (five to eight-year-old) from July through November 2016, referred to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences who needed pulpotomy treatment in both mandibular primary second molars. The Patients’ feeling during injection and their behavior during pulpotomy and post-treatment complications were registered. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test was used for analyzing the data. A significant level of differences was taken as p≤ 0.05. Results: Patients’ feeling during injection and post-treatment complications did not significantly differ between two groups (p>0.05). Patients’ behavior during pulpotomy was significantly better in articaine group (p=0.004). Conclusion: Articaine buccal infiltration can be used successfully in pulpotomy of mandibular primary second molars. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial: (IRCT2015042321484N2).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6076876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60768762018-08-07 Efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars: A randomized clinical trial Ghadimi, Sara Shahrabi, Mahdi Khosravi, Zahra Behroozi, Rooholah J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background: Successful anesthesia is a major concern in during pulpotomy treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block using 2% lidocaine and buccal infiltration using 4% articaine for pulpotomy of mandibular primary second molars. Methods: This randomized cross-over clinical trial was performed in 23 children (five to eight-year-old) from July through November 2016, referred to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences who needed pulpotomy treatment in both mandibular primary second molars. The Patients’ feeling during injection and their behavior during pulpotomy and post-treatment complications were registered. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test was used for analyzing the data. A significant level of differences was taken as p≤ 0.05. Results: Patients’ feeling during injection and post-treatment complications did not significantly differ between two groups (p>0.05). Patients’ behavior during pulpotomy was significantly better in articaine group (p=0.004). Conclusion: Articaine buccal infiltration can be used successfully in pulpotomy of mandibular primary second molars. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial: (IRCT2015042321484N2). Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6076876/ /pubmed/30087759 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.015 Text en © 2018 Ghadimi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article published and distributed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghadimi, Sara
Shahrabi, Mahdi
Khosravi, Zahra
Behroozi, Rooholah
Efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars: A randomized clinical trial
title Efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087759
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.015
work_keys_str_mv AT ghadimisara efficacyofarticaineinfiltrationversuslidocaineinferioralveolarnerveblockforpulpotomyinmandibularprimarysecondmolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT shahrabimahdi efficacyofarticaineinfiltrationversuslidocaineinferioralveolarnerveblockforpulpotomyinmandibularprimarysecondmolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT khosravizahra efficacyofarticaineinfiltrationversuslidocaineinferioralveolarnerveblockforpulpotomyinmandibularprimarysecondmolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT behroozirooholah efficacyofarticaineinfiltrationversuslidocaineinferioralveolarnerveblockforpulpotomyinmandibularprimarysecondmolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial