Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Background: Maintaining primary teeth in the oral cavity is of prime importance, and grossly carious teeth may require pulp therapy for the same. Pain on injection and incomplete anesthesia causes failure of the procedure and result in fear and anxiety. Various methods have evolved to overcome this;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurien, Reenu Sarah, Goswami, Mousumi, singh, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087760
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.016
_version_ 1783344797655760896
author Kurien, Reenu Sarah
Goswami, Mousumi
singh, Sanjay
author_facet Kurien, Reenu Sarah
Goswami, Mousumi
singh, Sanjay
author_sort Kurien, Reenu Sarah
collection PubMed
description Background: Maintaining primary teeth in the oral cavity is of prime importance, and grossly carious teeth may require pulp therapy for the same. Pain on injection and incomplete anesthesia causes failure of the procedure and result in fear and anxiety. Various methods have evolved to overcome this; such as distraction, topical anesthesia, etc. A few techniques regaining popularity in dentistry in recent times is the warming or buffering of the solution prior to administration. This study thus aimed to compare and evaluate the anesthetic efficacy and the patient’s pain reaction to pre-warmed, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in mandibular primary molars undergoing pulp therapy. Methods: The study is a randomized, split-mouth trial. Sixty children between six -12 years, requiring pulp therapy bilaterally on mandibular primary molars, were administered conventional, buffered or pre-warmed 2% lignocaine on two separate appointments. Various parameters were assessed using objective and subjective scales. Results: Pre-warmed and buffered anesthetics had lesser pain on injection (p<0.001, p<0.001) and pulp therapy (p=0.001, p=0.014), faster onset of action (p=0.004, p=0.001), lower SEM Sound (p=0.035, p=0.028), Eye (p< 0.001, p=0.013) and Motor (p=0.008, p=0.021) scores and shorter duration of action (p< 0.001, p=0.015). No significant difference was found between the two modified solutions. Thus pre-warmed and buffered anesthetic solutions fared better than the conventional solution for all parameters but had no advantage over each other. Conclusion: Buffering or pre-warming the anesthetic solution reduces pain on administration and during procedures in children. Trial registration number: CTRI/2017/02/007922
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6076879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60768792018-08-07 Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial Kurien, Reenu Sarah Goswami, Mousumi singh, Sanjay J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background: Maintaining primary teeth in the oral cavity is of prime importance, and grossly carious teeth may require pulp therapy for the same. Pain on injection and incomplete anesthesia causes failure of the procedure and result in fear and anxiety. Various methods have evolved to overcome this; such as distraction, topical anesthesia, etc. A few techniques regaining popularity in dentistry in recent times is the warming or buffering of the solution prior to administration. This study thus aimed to compare and evaluate the anesthetic efficacy and the patient’s pain reaction to pre-warmed, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in mandibular primary molars undergoing pulp therapy. Methods: The study is a randomized, split-mouth trial. Sixty children between six -12 years, requiring pulp therapy bilaterally on mandibular primary molars, were administered conventional, buffered or pre-warmed 2% lignocaine on two separate appointments. Various parameters were assessed using objective and subjective scales. Results: Pre-warmed and buffered anesthetics had lesser pain on injection (p<0.001, p<0.001) and pulp therapy (p=0.001, p=0.014), faster onset of action (p=0.004, p=0.001), lower SEM Sound (p=0.035, p=0.028), Eye (p< 0.001, p=0.013) and Motor (p=0.008, p=0.021) scores and shorter duration of action (p< 0.001, p=0.015). No significant difference was found between the two modified solutions. Thus pre-warmed and buffered anesthetic solutions fared better than the conventional solution for all parameters but had no advantage over each other. Conclusion: Buffering or pre-warming the anesthetic solution reduces pain on administration and during procedures in children. Trial registration number: CTRI/2017/02/007922 Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018 2018-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6076879/ /pubmed/30087760 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.016 Text en © 2018 Kurien et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article published and distributed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kurien, Reenu Sarah
Goswami, Mousumi
singh, Sanjay
Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (ianb) in mandibular primary molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6076879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087760
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.016
work_keys_str_mv AT kurienreenusarah comparativeevaluationofanestheticefficacyofwarmbufferedandconventional2lignocaineforthesuccessofinferioralveolarnerveblockianbinmandibularprimarymolarsarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT goswamimousumi comparativeevaluationofanestheticefficacyofwarmbufferedandconventional2lignocaineforthesuccessofinferioralveolarnerveblockianbinmandibularprimarymolarsarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT singhsanjay comparativeevaluationofanestheticefficacyofwarmbufferedandconventional2lignocaineforthesuccessofinferioralveolarnerveblockianbinmandibularprimarymolarsarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial