Cargando…

Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the utility of digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men in Arabia, an are of the world with a relatively low incidence of this disease. P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheikh, Mehraj, Sinan, Tariq, Kehinde, Elijah O., Hussein, Ali Y.T., Anim, Jehoram T., Al-Hunayant, Adel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17356323
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2007.73
_version_ 1783344827895644160
author Sheikh, Mehraj
Sinan, Tariq
Kehinde, Elijah O.
Hussein, Ali Y.T.
Anim, Jehoram T.
Al-Hunayant, Adel A.
author_facet Sheikh, Mehraj
Sinan, Tariq
Kehinde, Elijah O.
Hussein, Ali Y.T.
Anim, Jehoram T.
Al-Hunayant, Adel A.
author_sort Sheikh, Mehraj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the utility of digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men in Arabia, an are of the world with a relatively low incidence of this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 329 patients suspected of having prostate cancer on account of raised serum PSA level (> 4 ng/ml), DRE or TRUS findings, underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Raised PSA individually as well as combined, or a lesion suspicious of carcinoma on DRE or TRUS was recorded as PSA (+), DRE (+) or TRUS (+), respectively. The contribution of DRE, TRUS and serum PSA to the diagnosis of prostate cancer was analysed. RESULTS: Of the 329 patients who had prostate biopsies 109 cases (33.1%) had PCa. Of these 109 patients 56 (51%) had DRE (+), 77 (42%) had TRUS (+) and 49 (66%) had both DRE (+) and TRUS (+). Statistical analysis revealed that DRE (+) tripled the probability for cancer. PSA over a range of 10–50 ng/mL demonstrated an increasing cancer probability ranging from 2 to 3 fold. TRUS (+) was only significantly associated with cancer risk if PSA was elevated. The presence of all three factors increased the cancer probability by 6 to 7 fold. CONCLUSION: TRUS findings are dependent on PSA for interpretation while DRE (+) with elevated PSA makes PCa more likely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6077036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60770362018-09-21 Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men Sheikh, Mehraj Sinan, Tariq Kehinde, Elijah O. Hussein, Ali Y.T. Anim, Jehoram T. Al-Hunayant, Adel A. Ann Saudi Med Original Article BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the utility of digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men in Arabia, an are of the world with a relatively low incidence of this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 329 patients suspected of having prostate cancer on account of raised serum PSA level (> 4 ng/ml), DRE or TRUS findings, underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Raised PSA individually as well as combined, or a lesion suspicious of carcinoma on DRE or TRUS was recorded as PSA (+), DRE (+) or TRUS (+), respectively. The contribution of DRE, TRUS and serum PSA to the diagnosis of prostate cancer was analysed. RESULTS: Of the 329 patients who had prostate biopsies 109 cases (33.1%) had PCa. Of these 109 patients 56 (51%) had DRE (+), 77 (42%) had TRUS (+) and 49 (66%) had both DRE (+) and TRUS (+). Statistical analysis revealed that DRE (+) tripled the probability for cancer. PSA over a range of 10–50 ng/mL demonstrated an increasing cancer probability ranging from 2 to 3 fold. TRUS (+) was only significantly associated with cancer risk if PSA was elevated. The presence of all three factors increased the cancer probability by 6 to 7 fold. CONCLUSION: TRUS findings are dependent on PSA for interpretation while DRE (+) with elevated PSA makes PCa more likely. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC6077036/ /pubmed/17356323 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2007.73 Text en Copyright © 2007, Annals of Saudi Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Sheikh, Mehraj
Sinan, Tariq
Kehinde, Elijah O.
Hussein, Ali Y.T.
Anim, Jehoram T.
Al-Hunayant, Adel A.
Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men
title Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men
title_full Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men
title_fullStr Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men
title_full_unstemmed Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men
title_short Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men
title_sort relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in arab men
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17356323
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2007.73
work_keys_str_mv AT sheikhmehraj relativecontributionofdigitalrectalexaminationandtransrectalultrasonographyininterpretingserumprostatespecificantigenvaluesforscreeningprostatecancerinarabmen
AT sinantariq relativecontributionofdigitalrectalexaminationandtransrectalultrasonographyininterpretingserumprostatespecificantigenvaluesforscreeningprostatecancerinarabmen
AT kehindeelijaho relativecontributionofdigitalrectalexaminationandtransrectalultrasonographyininterpretingserumprostatespecificantigenvaluesforscreeningprostatecancerinarabmen
AT husseinaliyt relativecontributionofdigitalrectalexaminationandtransrectalultrasonographyininterpretingserumprostatespecificantigenvaluesforscreeningprostatecancerinarabmen
AT animjehoramt relativecontributionofdigitalrectalexaminationandtransrectalultrasonographyininterpretingserumprostatespecificantigenvaluesforscreeningprostatecancerinarabmen
AT alhunayantadela relativecontributionofdigitalrectalexaminationandtransrectalultrasonographyininterpretingserumprostatespecificantigenvaluesforscreeningprostatecancerinarabmen