Cargando…

Assessing glycemia in type 1 diabetic patients using a microdialysis system for continuous glucose monitoring

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring systems can monitor moment-to-moment changes in blood glucose concentration, which cannot be detected by intermittent self-monitoring. Continuing monitoring systems may lead to improved glycemic control. We evaluated a microdialysis technique for improving g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radman, Maja, Jurišić, Dubravka, Ljutić, Dragan, Jerković, Romana, Kovačić, Nataša, Hozo, Izet Salih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17568167
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2007.166
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring systems can monitor moment-to-moment changes in blood glucose concentration, which cannot be detected by intermittent self-monitoring. Continuing monitoring systems may lead to improved glycemic control. We evaluated a microdialysis technique for improving glycemic control in type 1 diabetes patients treated by different means of basal insulin substitution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two type 1 diabetic patients on twice daily NPH and pre-meal aspart insulin were randomized in two groups: the continuation of NPH (n=26) (group 1) or once daily glargine (n=26) (group 2). 48-hour GlucoDay registrations were started at the beginning and after 4 months. RESULTS: At baseline, time spent in the euglycemic range (glucose between 3.9 and 8.0 mmol/L) was 37.96±6.81% for the NPH group and 35.83±6.24% for the glargine group. At endpoint, time in the euglycemic range increased in both groups (51.02±7.22% and 57.29±10.27%, P<0.001 vs. before treatment for both groups). Time spent in the hypoglycemic range (glucose <3.9 mmol/L) was 9.98±2.57% for the first group and 10.24±3.55% for the second group at baseline. At endpoint, time in the hypoglycemic range decreased in both groups (8.00±2.13% and 6.59±2.04%, P<0.001 vs. before treatment for both groups). CONCLUSION: The analysis of the GlucoDay data gave us information about glycemia other than HbA1c and self-monitoring of blood glucose, such us a peakless activity profile and the lower percentage of time spent in the hypoglycemic range in the glargine-treated group.